Dataset Information

Efficient spiral in-out and EPI balanced steady-state free precession cine imaging using a high-performance 0.55T MRI.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Low-field MRI offers favorable physical properties for SNR-efficient long readout acquisitions such as spiral and EPI. We used a 0.55 tesla (T) MRI system equipped with high-performance hardware to increase the sampling duty cycle and extend the TR of balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cardiac cine acquisitions, which typically are limited by banding artifacts.

Methods

We developed a high-efficiency spiral in-out bSSFP acquisition, with zeroth- and first-gradient moment nulling, and an EPI bSSFP acquisition for cardiac cine imaging using a contemporary MRI system modified to operate at 0.55T. Spiral in-out and EPI bSSFP cine protocols, with TR = 8 ms, were designed to maintain both spatiotemporal resolution and breath-hold length. Simulations, phantom imaging, and healthy volunteer imaging studies (n = 12) were performed to assess SNR and image quality using these high sampling duty-cycle bSSFP sequences.

Results

Spiral in-out bSSFP performed favorably at 0.55T and generated good image quality, whereas EPI bSSFP suffered motion and flow artifacts. There was no difference in ejection fraction comparing spiral in-out with standard Cartesian imaging. Moreover, human images demonstrated a 79% ± 21% increase in myocardial SNR using spiral in-out bSSFP and 50% ± 14% increase in SNR using EPI bSSFP as compared with the reference Cartesian acquisition. Spiral in-out acquisitions at 0.55T recovered 69% ± 14% of the myocardial SNR at 1.5T.

Conclusion

Efficient bSSFP spiral in-out provided high-quality cardiac cine imaging and SNR recovery on a high-performance 0.55T MRI system.

SUBMITTER: Restivo MC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7402011 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging is still limited by long acquisition times. This study evaluated the clinical utility of an accelerated two-dimensional (2D) cine sequence with deep learning reconstruction (Sonic DL) to decrease acquisition time without compromising quantitative volumetry or image quality.MethodsA sub-study using 16 participants was performed using Sonic DL at two different acceleration factors (8× and 12×). Quantitative left-ventricular volumetry, function, and mass measurements were compared between the two acceleration factors against a standard cine method. Following this sub-study, 108 participants were prospectively recruited and imaged using a standard cine method and the Sonic DL method with the acceleration factor that more closely matched the reference method. Two experienced clinical readers rated images based on their diagnostic utility and performed all image contouring. Quantitative contrast difference and endocardial border sharpness were also assessed. Left- and right-ventricular volumetry, left-ventricular mass, and myocardial strain measurements were compared between cine methods using Bland-Altman plots, Pearson's correlation, and paired t-tests. Comparative analysis of image quality was measured using Wilcoxon-signed-rank tests and visualized using bar graphs.ResultsSonic DL at an acceleration factor of 8 more closely matched the reference cine method. There were no significant differences found across left ventricular volumetry, function, or mass measurements. In contrast, an acceleration factor of 12 resulted in a 6% (5.51/90.16) reduction of measured ejection fraction when compared to the standard cine method and a 4% (4.32/88.98) reduction of measured ejection fraction when compared to Sonic DL at an acceleration factor of 8. Thus, Sonic DL at an acceleration factor of 8 was chosen for downstream analysis. In the larger cohort, this accelerated cine sequence was successfully performed in all participants and significantly reduced the acquisition time of cine images compared to the standard 2D method (reduction of 37% (5.98/16) p < 0.0001). Diagnostic image quality ratings and quantitative image quality evaluations were statistically not different between the two methods (p > 0.05). Left- and right-ventricular volumetry and circumferential and radial strain were also similar between methods (p > 0.05) but left-ventricular mass and longitudinal strain were over-estimated using the proposed accelerated cine method (mass over-estimated by 3.36 g/m2, p < 0.0001; longitudinal strain over-estimated by 1.97%, p = 0.001).ConclusionThis study found that an accelerated 2D cine method with DL reconstruction at an acceleration factor of 8 can reduce CMR cine acquisition time by 37% (5.98/16) without significantly affecting volumetry or image quality. Given the increase of scan time efficiency, this undersampled acquisition method using deep learning reconstruction should be considered for routine clinical CMR.