Dataset Information

Training and Certifying Users of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose- The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, designed and validated for use in clinical stroke trials, is now required for all patients with stroke at hospital admission. Recertification is required annually but no data support this frequency; the effect of mandatory training before recertification is unknown. Methods- To clarify optimal recertification frequency and training effect, we assessed users' mastery of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale over several years using correct scores (accuracy) on each scale item of the 15-point scale. We also constructed 9 technical errors that could result from misunderstanding the scoring rules. We measured accuracy and the frequency of these technical errors over time. Using multivariable regression, we assessed the effect of time, repeat testing, and profession on user mastery. Results- The final dataset included 1.3×106 examinations. Data were consistent among all 3 online vendors that provide training and certification. Test accuracy showed no significant changes over time. Technical error rates were remarkably low, ranging from 0.48 to 1.36 per 90 test items. Within 2 vendors (that do not require training), the technical error rates increased negligibly over time (P<0.05). In data from a third vendor, mandatory training before recertification improved (reduced) technical errors but not accuracy. Conclusions- The data suggest that mastery of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scoring rules is stable over time, and the recertification interval should be lengthened. Mandatory retraining may be needed after unsuccessful recertifications, but not routinely otherwise.

SUBMITTER: Anderson A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7402267 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Training and Certifying Users of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Anderson Ariana A Klein John J White Brian B Bourgeois Marianne M Leonard Anne A Pacino Al A Hill John J Lyden Patrick P

Stroke 20200128 3

Background and Purpose- The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, designed and validated for use in clinical stroke trials, is now required for all patients with stroke at hospital admission. Recertification is required annually but no data support this frequency; the effect of mandatory training before recertification is unknown. Methods- To clarify optimal recertification frequency and training effect, we assessed users' mastery of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale over seve ...[more]

PMID: 31986988

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) penalizes hospitals for higher than expected 30-day mortality rates using methods without accounting for condition severity risk adjustment. For patients with stroke, CMS claims did not quantify stroke severity until recently, when the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) reporting began.ObjectiveExamine the predictive ability of claim-based NIHSS to predict 30-day mortality and 30-day hospital readmission in patients with ischemic stroke.DesignRetrospective cohort study of Medicare claims data.PatientsMedicare beneficiaries with ischemic stroke (N=43,241) acute hospitalization between October 2016 and November 2017.MeasurementsAll-cause 30-day mortality and 30-day hospital readmission. NIHSS score was derived from ICD-10 codes and stratified into the following: minor to moderate, moderate, moderate to severe, and severe categories.ResultsAmong 43,241 patients with ischemic stroke with NIHSS from 2,659 US hospitals, 64.6% had minor to moderate stroke, 14.3% had moderate, 12.7% had moderate to severe, and 8.5% had a severe stroke,10.1% died within 30 days, 12.1% were readmitted within 30 days. The NIHSS exhibited stronger discriminant property (C-statistic 0.83, 95% CI: 0.82-0.84) for 30-day mortality compared to Elixhauser (0.74, 95% CI: 0.73-0.75). A monotonic increase in the adjusted 30-day mortality risk occurred relative to minor to moderate stroke category: hazard ratio [HR]=2.92 (95% CI=2.59-3.29) for moderate stroke, HR=5.49 (95% CI=4.90-6.15) for moderate to severe stroke, and HR=7.82 (95% CI=6.95-8.80) for severe stroke. After accounting for competing risk of mortality, there was a significantly higher readmission risk in the moderate stroke (HR=1.11, 95% CI=1.03-1.20), but significantly lower readmission risk in the severe stroke (HR=0.84, 95% CI=0.74-0.95) categories.LimitationTiming of NIHSS reporting during hospitalization is unknown.ConclusionsMedicare claim-based NIHSS is significantly associated with 30-day mortality in Medicare patients with ischemic stroke and significantly improves discriminant property relative to the Elixhauser comorbidity index.

Project description:BackgroundPrompt and accurate identification of stroke victims is essential to reduce time from symptom onset to adequate treatment and to improve neurological outcomes. Most neurologists evaluate the extent of neurological deficit according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), but the use of this scale by paramedics, the first healthcare providers to usually take care of stroke victims, has proven unreliable. This might be, at least in part, due to the teaching method. The video used to teach NIHSS lacks interactivity, while more engaging electronic learning (e-learning) methods might improve knowledge acquisition.ObjectiveThis study was designed to evaluate whether a highly interactive e-learning module could enhance NIHSS knowledge acquisition in paramedics.MethodsA randomized controlled trial comparing a specially designed e-learning module with the original NIHSS video was performed with paramedics working in Geneva, Switzerland. A registration number was not required as our study does not come into the scope of the Swiss federal law on human research. The protocol was nevertheless submitted to the local ethics committee (Project ID 2017-00847), which issued a "Declaration of no objection." Paramedics were excluded if they had prior knowledge of or previous training in the NIHSS, or if they had worked in a neurology or neurosurgery ward. The primary outcome was overall performance in the study quiz, which contained 50 questions. Secondary outcomes were performance by NIHSS item, time to course and quiz completion, user satisfaction regarding the learning method, user perception of the course duration, and probability the user would recommend the course to a colleague.ResultsThe study was completed by 39 paramedics. There was a better overall median score (36/50 vs 33/50, P=.04) and a higher degree of satisfaction regarding the learning method in the e-learning group (90% vs 37%, P=.002). Users who had followed the e-learning module were more likely to recommend the course to a colleague (95% vs 63%, P=.02). Paramedics in the e-learning group took more time to complete the course (93 vs 59 minutes, P<.001), but considered the duration to be more adequate (75% vs 32%, P=.01). Time to quiz completion was similar between groups (25 vs 38 minutes, P=.12).ConclusionsUse of an e-learning module shows promising results in teaching the NIHSS to paramedics.

Project description:BackgroundNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is the most validated clinical scale for stroke recognition, severity grading, and symptom monitoring in acute care and hospital settings. Numerous modified prehospital stroke scales exist, but these scales contain less clinical information and lack compatibility with in-hospital stroke scales. In this real-life study, we aimed to investigate if NIHSS conducted by paramedics in the field is a feasible and accurate prehospital diagnostic tool.MethodsThis prospective cohort study is part of Treat-NASPP (Treat-Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project) conducted at a single medical center in Østfold, Norway. Sixty-three paramedics were trained and certified in NIHSS, and the prehospital NIHSS scores were compared with the scores obtained by in-hospital stroke physicians. Interrater agreement was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement. In secondary analysis, Cohen κ was used for the clinical categories NIHSS score of 0 to 5 and ≥6. As a safety measure, prehospital time was compared between paramedics conducting NIHSS and conventional paramedics.ResultsWe included 274 patients. The mean difference in NIHSS scores between the paramedics and the stroke physicians was 0.92 with limits of agreement from -5.74 to 7.59. Interrater agreement for the 2 clinical categories was moderate with a κ of 0.58. The prehospital NIHSS scoring was performed mean (SD) 42 (14) minutes earlier than the in-hospital scoring. Prehospital time was not significantly increased in the NIHSS-trained paramedic group compared with conventional paramedics (median [interquartile range] on-scene-time 18 [13-25] minutes versus 16 [11-23] minutes, P=0.064 and onset-to-hospital time 86 [65-128] minutes versus 84 [56-140] minutes, P=0.535).ConclusionsParamedics can use NIHSS as an accurate and time efficient prehospital stroke severity quantification tool. Introducing NIHSS in the emergency medical services will enable prehospital evaluation of stroke progression and provide a common language for stroke assessment between paramedics and stroke physicians.RegistrationURL: https://www.Clinicaltrialsgov; Unique identifier: NCT03158259.

Dataset Information

Training and Certifying Users of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Publications

Training and Certifying Users of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets