Dataset Information

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Otolaryngology trainee education.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced clinical volume with a negative impact on trainee education. METHODS:Survey study of Otolaryngology trainees in North America, during the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020. RESULTS:Of 216 respondents who accessed the survey, 175 (83%) completed the survey. Respondents reported a universal decrease in clinical activities (98.3%). Among participants who felt their program utilized technology well, there were significantly decreased concerns to receiving adequate educational knowledge (29.6% vs 65.2%, P =?.003). However, 68% of trainees still expressed concern in ability to receive adequate surgical training. In addition, 54.7% of senior trainees felt that the pandemic had a negative impact on their ability to secure a job or fellowship after training. CONCLUSIONS:Trainees universally felt a negative impact due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Use of technology was able to alleviate some concerns in gaining adequate educational knowledge, but decreased surgical training remained the most prevalent concern.

SUBMITTER: Guo T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7405272 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Otolaryngology trainee education.

Guo Theresa T Kiong Kimberley L KL Yao Christopher M K L CMKL Windon Melina M Zebda Denna D Jozaghi Yelda Y Zhao Xiao X Hessel Amy C AC Hanna Ehab Y EY

Head & neck 20200715 10

<h4>Background</h4>The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced clinical volume with a negative impact on trainee education.<h4>Methods</h4>Survey study of Otolaryngology trainees in North America, during the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020.<h4>Results</h4>Of 216 respondents who accessed the survey, 175 (83%) completed the survey. Respondents reported a universal decrease in clinical activities (98.3%). Among participants who felt their program utilized technology well, there were significantly decreased c ...[more]

PMID: 32666664

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMajor disruptions and changes in education have occurred worldwide as a result of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the ensuing shift from in-person to online education. However, the effect of such changes on medical education, its magnitude, and the learning domains impacted by such rapid changes have not been adequately addressed, particularly with regard to objective assessment approaches.MethodsSecond-year medical students enrolled in our Medical English Course between 2019 and 2021 were recruited from Hokkaido University, Japan (N = 321) to participate in this study. We evaluated the potential impact of teaching styles on the academic performance of students before (2019; face-to-face) and during (2020; online; 2021; in-person and online) the pandemic. We examined the potential effect of three teaching styles--in-person (2019), online (2020), and a combination of these (2021) on the academic performance of medical students using: (i) subjective assessment of self-reported general English skills, including reading, writing, listening, and speaking; and (ii) objective assessment of medical terminology scores, evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills, and final written exam scores.ResultsIn-person education significantly improved listening and speaking skills in 2019 (p < 0.001). This trend was observed for writing skills in an online course in 2020 (p = 0.001). With the combined teaching method, students reported significant improvements in all four English skills. In our objective assessments, medical terminology improved significantly post-test versus pre-test for all three teaching styles, and we found that the online course did not adversely affect the gain in medical terminology knowledge during the course. Additionally, we did not find any significant differences across the three applied teaching styles regarding EBM skill levels. It is noteworthy that the students taking online courses had a significantly higher final exam score (mean ± SD; 82.8 ± 8.2) than in in-person (78.6 ± 8.8) and combined (79.7 ± 12.1) teaching styles.ConclusionsIn our study, the online/combined courses showed better academic outcomes compared to the face-to-face course in the preclinical clerkship. Although the current results need to be replicated on a larger scale, online/combined courses can continue and evolve in the post-pandemic education of medical students. Medical schools and institutions should consider incorporating such courses, especially combined courses, into their curricula in the future to improve the effectiveness, accessibility, and flexibility of medical education.

Dataset Information

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Otolaryngology trainee education.

Publications

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Otolaryngology trainee education.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets