Dataset Information

Effects of Febuxostat on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To investigate the association between using febuxostat and cardiovascular events.

Methods

Systematic search of randomized controlled trials was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane review, and EMBASE databases through April 17, 2019. Meta-analysis was performed using random effect model and estimates were reported as risk difference (RD) with 95% CIs. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The main outcomes of interest were cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (16,070 participants) were included. The mean ± SD age was 58.1±11.7 years. At the median follow-up of 6.4 months, use of febuxostat was not associated with statistically significant risk of cardiovascular mortality (RD, 0.12%; 95% CI, -0.25% to 0.49%; I ² =48%; low certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (RD, 0.20%; 95% CI, -0.28% to 0.68%; I ² =60%; very low certainty evidence), major adverse cardiovascular events (RD, 0.40%; 95% CI, -0.34% to 1.13%; I ² =26%; low certainty evidence), myocardial infarction (RD, -0.06%; 95% CI, -0.29% to 0.17%; I ² =0%; moderate certainty evidence), stroke (RD, 0.10%; 95% CI, -0.15% to 0.35%; I ² =0%; moderate certainty evidence), or new-onset hypertension (RD, 1.58%; 95% CI, -0.63% to 3.78%; I ² =58%; very low certainty evidence). These findings were consistent in patients with existing cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that use of febuxostat was not associated with higher risk of mortality or adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with gout and hyperuricemia. The results were limited by low to moderate certainty of evidence.

SUBMITTER: Al-Abdouh A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7411164 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of Febuxostat on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Al-Abdouh Ahmad A Khan Safi U SU Barbarawi Mahmoud M Upadhrasta Sireesha S Munira Srajum S Bizanti Anas A Elias Hadi H Jat Asadulla A Zhao Di D Michos Erin D ED

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes 20200805 4

<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the association between using febuxostat and cardiovascular events.<h4>Methods</h4>Systematic search of randomized controlled trials was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane review, and EMBASE databases through April 17, 2019. Meta-analysis was performed using random effect model and estimates were reported as risk difference (RD) with 95% CIs. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation a ...[more]

PMID: 32793871

Similar Datasets

Project description:Prior studies have reported improvements in population-level risk factor burden and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes using polypills for CVD risk reduction. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact of polypills on CVD outcomes, mortality, adherence, and side effects across different settings has not previously been reported. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the association between polypill therapy and CVD outcomes published before February 2021. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of major adverse CVD events (MACE). Risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes were converted to log RR and pooled using a generic inverse variance weighted random-effects model. Data for continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effects modeling and presented as mean differences with 95% CIs. Eight studies representing 25,584 patients were included for analysis. In the overall pooled analysis, the use of polypills was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70-1.02) and significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-1.00). The reductions in the risk of MACE with polypill use varied by baseline risk and nature of the study population (primary prevention vs. secondary prevention), with the most significant risk reduction among lower-risk cohorts, including within primary prevention populations [RR 0.70 (0.62, 0.79)]. Among measures of CVD risk factors, modest but significant reductions were observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure [systolic: mean difference 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: -3.07 to -0.91); diastolic: mean difference 1.30 mmHg (95% CI: -2.42 to -0.19), but not for levels of total or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Use of the polypill strategy significantly improved drug adherence (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11-1.55) with no association between polypill use and rates of adverse events or drug discontinuation. The use of polypill formulations is associated with significant reductions in CVD risk factors and the risk of all-cause mortality and MACE, particularly in the low-risk and primary prevention population.

Project description:BackgroundThe number of randomized controlled trials using auricular stimulation (AS) such as transauricular vagus nerve stimulation, or other auricular electrostimulation or auricular acupuncture or acupressure, in experimental and clinical settings, has increased markedly over the last three decades. This systematic review focusses on cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation.Methods and analysisThe following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, and Scopus Database. RCTs were reviewed that had been published in English and European languages. Data collection and analysis was conducted by two reviewers independently. Quality and risk assessment of included studies was performed and the meta-analysis of the effect of the most frequently assessed biomarkers.ResultsAltogether, 78 trials were included. 38 studies assessed heart rate (HR), 19 studies analyzed heart rate variability (HRV), 31 studies analyzed blood pressure (BP) and 7 studies were identified that measured oxygen saturation (O2), 2 studies on baroreflex sensitivity and 2 studies on skin conductance were evaluated in this review. 26 studies contained continuous data and were eligible for meta-analysis, 50 trials reported non continuous data and were evaluated descriptively. The overall quality of the studies was moderate to low. AS leads to a significant reduction of HR, the changes though were not considered an adverse reaction. Furthermore, when looking at HRV, AS was able to reduce the LF/HF ratio significantly compared to control procedures. No other cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, baroreflex sensitivity) were changed significantly. AS produced only minor side effects in all trials.ConclusionAS can lead to clinically safe reduction of HR and changes in the LF/HF ratio of the HRV, which is presumably via an increase in vagal activity. More research is needed to clarify whether AS can be used to modulate tachycardia or indications with autonomic imbalance.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=231885 PROSPERO, ID CRD42021231885.

Project description:In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning regarding potential adverse effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) on cognition, based on the Adverse Events Reporting System and a review of the medical literature. We aimed to synthesize randomized clinical trial (RCTs) evidence on the association between statin therapy and cognitive outcomes.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL through December 2012, and reviewed published systematic reviews of statin treatment. We sought RCTs that compared statin treatment versus placebo or standard care, and reported at least one cognitive outcome (frequency of adverse cognitive events or measurements using standard neuropsychological cognitive test scores). Studies reporting sufficient information to calculate effect sizes were included in meta-analyses. Standardized and unstandardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes for global cognition and for pre-specified cognitive domains. The main outcome was change in cognition measured by neuropsychological tests; an outcome of secondary interest was the frequency of adverse cognitive events observed during follow-up.We identified 25 RCTs (all placebo-controlled) reporting cognitive outcomes in 46,836 subjects, of which 23 RCTs reported cognitive test results in 29,012 participants. Adverse cognitive outcomes attributable to statins were rarely reported in trials involving cognitively normal or impaired subjects. Furthermore, meta-analysis of cognitive test data (14 studies; 27,643 participants) failed to show significant adverse effects of statins on all tests of cognition in either cognitively normal subjects (standardized mean difference 0.01, 95% confidence interval, CI, -0.01 to 0.03, p?=?0.42) or Alzheimer's disease subjects (standardized mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10, p?=?0.38).Statin therapy was not associated with cognitive impairment in RCTs. These results raise questions regarding the continued merit of the FDA warning about potential adverse effects of statins on cognition.

Dataset Information

Effects of Febuxostat on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Effects of Febuxostat on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets