Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: a meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Estimating prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) worldwide is necessary in designing control programs and allocating health resources. We performed a meta-analysis to calculate the prevalence of CT in the general population. METHODS:The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for eligible population-based studies from its inception through June 5, 2019. Q test and I2 statistic were used to calculate the heterogeneity between studies. Random effects models were used to pool the prevalence of CT. Meta regression was performed to explore the possible sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and "trim and fill" method. RESULTS:Twenty nine studies that reported prevalence of CT infection from 24 countries were identified, including a total population of 89,886 persons. The pooled prevalence of CT among the general population was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.4-3.5%), and females had a higher CT prevalence (3.1, 95% CI, 2.5-3.8%) than males (2.6, 95% CI, 2.0-3.2%) (?2?=?10.38, P?

SUBMITTER: Huai P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7414538 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: a meta-analysis.

Huai Pengcheng P   Li Furong F   Chu Tongsheng T   Liu Dianchang D   Liu Jian J   Zhang Furen F  

BMC infectious diseases 20200808 1


<h4>Background</h4>Estimating prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) worldwide is necessary in designing control programs and allocating health resources. We performed a meta-analysis to calculate the prevalence of CT in the general population.<h4>Methods</h4>The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for eligible population-based studies from its inception through June 5, 2019. Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistic were used to calculate the heterogeneity between studies. Random effects model  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6483758 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3462140 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5113142 | biostudies-literature
2013-03-01 | E-GEOD-41075 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2013-03-01 | GSE41075 | GEO
| S-EPMC2791188 | biostudies-literature
2020-05-27 | GSE151183 | GEO