Dataset Information

Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry is used widely in clinical trials and routine practice to assess paracentral scotoma. Current interpretation of MAIA is based on an assumed uniform 25 decibel (dB) cutoff for normal function irrespective of subject age and retinal location. We examined this convention by establishing an age- and loci-specific reference in healthy eyes and comparing this to the <25 dB cutoff. Methods:Retrospective MAIA results from healthy eyes were analyzed for prevalence of loci with <25 dB. At each locus, a new reference cutoff was derived from quantile regression of sensitivity against age at the 2.5th percentile. Two clinical cases of serial MAIA testing were analyzed using the new approach and compared to the <25 dB cutoff. Results:Fifty-four and 56 age-matched (range: 16-75 years) healthy eyes underwent small (37 loci) and large (68 loci) grid testing, respectively. Retinal sensitivity <25 dB was found in 5% of the small grid (1998 data points) and 10% of the large grid (3808 data points). These were found predominantly in older subjects and at the central point or in the perifoveal region. Quantile regression at each individual locus showed age-related decline with a median gradient of 0.6 dB/decade. Conclusions:We caution against using <25 dB cutoff in MAIA interpretation and advocate an age- and loci-specific cutoff criterion. Translational Relevance:Our study suggests that MAIA interpretation is influenced by the criterion used for defining abnormal pointwise measurement.

SUBMITTER: Charng J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7414638 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.

Charng Jason J Sanfilippo Paul G PG Attia Mary S MS Dolliver Monika M Arunachalam Sukanya S Chew Avenell L AL Wong Evan N EN Mackey David A DA Chen Fred K FK

Translational vision science & technology 20200618 7

<h4>Purpose</h4>Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry is used widely in clinical trials and routine practice to assess paracentral scotoma. Current interpretation of MAIA is based on an assumed uniform 25 decibel (dB) cutoff for normal function irrespective of subject age and retinal location. We examined this convention by establishing an age- and loci-specific reference in healthy eyes and comparing this to the <25 dB cutoff.<h4>Methods</h4>Retrospective MAIA results from healthy ...[more]

PMID: 32832226

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:To examine whether age-related reference ranges for "normal" prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS:Subjects were men aged 50-69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1-T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7-10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50-59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60-70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL). RESULTS:We included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION:There is no benefit to using reference ranges for "normal" PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed.

Dataset Information

Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.

Publications

Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets