Dataset Information

The Efficacy of Lenvatinib Plus Everolimus in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Exhibiting Primary Resistance to Front-Line Targeted Therapy or Immunotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients with primary refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have a dismal prognosis and poor response to subsequent treatments. While there are several approved second-line therapies, it remains critical to choose the most effective treatment regimen.

Patients and methods

We identified 7 patients with clear cell mRCC who had primary resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy. The patients were treated with lenvatinib (a multitargeted TKI) plus everolimus (a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor). Among these 7 patients, 2 had prior TKI therapy, 3 had prior ICI therapy, and 2 had prior TKI and ICI therapy. We collected the patients' clinical characteristics, molecular profiles, treatment durations, and toxicity outcomes.

Results

The median time to progression on prior therapies was 1.5 months. Lenvatinib plus everolimus was used either as a second-line (n = 4) or third-line (n = 3) therapy. As best responses, 3 patients had partial responses and 3 achieved stable disease. Patients were followed for ≥17 months; progression-free survival ranged from 3 to 15 months, and overall survival ranged from 4 to 17 months.

Conclusion

These 7 cases provide real-world data for the use of lenvatinib plus everolimus in patients with mRCC with primary resistance to first-line VEGF-targeted TKIs or ICI combination therapy.

SUBMITTER: Hamieh L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7415534 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe lenvatinib (LEN) plus everolimus (EVE) combination demonstrated improved progression-free survival over everolimus alone in a phase 2 trial (Study-205).ObjectiveTo compare quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST) between LEN + EVE and EVE alone among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following one prior antiangiogenic therapy.Design setting and participantsThis was a post hoc analysis of Study-205.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisSurvival time was partitioned into three mutually exclusive health states: time with grade 3/4 toxicity (TOX); time before disease progression and without grade 3/4 toxicity (TWiST); and time after disease progression (REL). The mean time in each state was weighted by utility measures and summed to calculate Q-TWiST. Nonparametric bootstrapping generated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the base case, utility for TWiST, TOX, and REL was assigned as 1.0, 0.5, and 0.5, respectively. Sensitivity analyses applied alternative utility values for REL, TOX, and TWiST. A relative gain in Q-TWiST of ≥10% and ≥15% has been established as clinically important and clearly clinically important, respectively.Results and limitationsPatients receiving LEN + EVE (n = 51) had a significant mean Q-TWiST gain of 3.7 mo (14.7 vs 11.0 mo; 95% CI for difference 1.3-6.3), with a relative gain of 24% compared to EVE alone. In a sensitivity analysis using alternative utility values for TWiST (varied from 0.55 to 0.9) with utility set to 0.5 for both TOX and REL, the relative Q-TWiST gain was maintained (ranging from 11.0% to 21.2%; all significant) across varying utility values. Limitations include the sample size, the absence of utility estimates, and the length of adverse events from the trial.ConclusionsLEN + EVE showed a significant and clearly clinically important improvement in quality-adjusted survival time versus EVE alone.Patient summaryPatients with advanced kidney cancer who had received other previous treatments experienced a clearly clinically important improvement in quality survival time when treated with lenvatinib plus everolimus compared to everolimus alone.