Dataset Information

Relationships between excessive gestational weight gain and energy and macronutrient intake in pregnant women.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to compare energy and macronutrient intake, birth weight, and anthropometric parameters (mid-upper arm circumference or tricipital skin-fold thickness) between women who had adequate and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy. METHODS:We studied 115 pregnant women and divided them according to GWG into two groups: adequate GWG (n?=?49) and excessive GWG (n?=?66). We assessed the medical history, clinical examinations, and dietary habits through a detailed 7-day dietary recall using myfitnesspal software. RESULTS:Weight, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, and tricipital skin-fold thickness were significantly higher at the time of delivery in women with excessive GWG compared with those with adequate GWG. A lipid-based diet was a risk factor for excessive GWG (relative risk: 1.488, 95% confidence interval: 1.112-1.991), whereas a protein-based diet was a protective factor (relative risk: 0.6723, 95% confidence interval: 0.4431-1.020). We found no significant relationship between a carbohydrate-based diet and GWG. The total energy intake was significantly higher in the excessive GWG group than in the adequate GWG group. CONCLUSIONS:Mainly a lipid-based diet in pregnant women might represent a risk factor for excessive GWG. However, a protein-based diet is a protective factor for excessive GWG.

SUBMITTER: Rugina C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7418251 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Relationships between excessive gestational weight gain and energy and macronutrient intake in pregnant women.

Rugină Cosmin C Mărginean Cristina Oana CO Meliţ Lorena Elena LE Giga Dana Valentina DV Modi Viviana V Mărginean Claudiu C

The Journal of international medical research 20200801 8

<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to compare energy and macronutrient intake, birth weight, and anthropometric parameters (mid-upper arm circumference or tricipital skin-fold thickness) between women who had adequate and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy.<h4>Methods</h4>We studied 115 pregnant women and divided them according to GWG into two groups: adequate GWG (n = 49) and excessive GWG (n = 66). We assessed the medical history, clinical examinations, and dietary habits ...[more]

PMID: 32776838

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExcessive gestational weight gain is associated with adverse infant, childhood and maternal outcomes and research to develop interventions to address this issue is ongoing. The views of women on gestational weight gain and the resources they would consider helpful in addressing this are however largely unknown. This survey aimed to determine the views of newly pregnant women, living in areas of social disadvantage, on 1) their current body weight and potential gestational weight gain and 2) the resources or interventions they would consider helpful in preventing excessive gestational weight gain.MethodsA convenience sample of overweight and obese pregnant women living in Fife, UK, were invited to complete a short anonymised questionnaire at their 12 week booking visit.Results428 women, BMI>25 kg/m(2), completed the questionnaire. Fifty-four per cent of respondents were obese (231) and 62% were living in areas of mild to moderate deprivation. Over three-quarters of participants felt dissatisfied with their current weight (81%). The majority of women (60%) expressed some concern about potential weight gain. Thirty-nine percent were unconcerned about weight gain during their pregnancy, including 34 women (19%) who reported having retained weight gained in earlier pregnancies. Amongst those concerned about weight gain advice on physical activity (41%) and access to sports/leisure facilities were favoured resources (36%). Fewer women (12%) felt that group sessions on healthy eating or attending a clinic for individualised advice (14%) would be helpful. "Getting time off work" was the most frequently cited barrier (48%) to uptake of resources other than leaflets.ConclusionsThese data suggest a lack of awareness amongst overweight and obese women regarding excessive gestational weight gain. Monitoring of gestational weight gain, and approaches for its management, should be formally integrated into routine antenatal care. Barriers to the uptake of resources to address weight gain are numerous and must be considered in the design of future interventions and services.

Project description:BackgroundExcessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with adverse health outcomes for mother and child. Intervention strategies to prevent excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) should consider women's individual risk profile, however, no tool exists for identifying women at risk at an early stage. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a screening questionnaire based on early risk factors for excessive GWG.MethodsThe cohort from the German "Gesund leben in der Schwangerschaft"/ "healthy living in pregnancy" (GeliS) trial was used to derive a risk score predicting excessive GWG. Sociodemographics, anthropometrics, smoking behaviour and mental health status were collected before week 12th of gestation. GWG was calculated using the last and the first weight measured during routine antenatal care. The data were randomly split into development and validation datasets with an 80:20 ratio. Using the development dataset, a multivariate logistic regression model with stepwise backward elimination was performed to identify salient risk factors associated with excessive GWG. The β coefficients of the variables were translated into a score. The risk score was validated by an internal cross-validation and externally with data from the FeLIPO study (GeliS pilot study). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) was used to estimate the predictive power of the score.Results1790 women were included in the analysis, of whom 45.6% showed excessive GWG. High pre-pregnancy body mass index, intermediate educational level, being born in a foreign country, primiparity, smoking, and signs of depressive disorder were associated with the risk of excessive GWG and included in the screening questionnaire. The developed score varied from 0-15 and divided the women´s risk for excessive GWG into low (0-5), moderate (6-10) and high (11-15). The cross-validation and the external validation yielded a moderate predictive power with an AUC of 0.709 and 0.738, respectively.ConclusionsOur screening questionnaire is a simple and valid tool to identify pregnant women at risk for excessive GWG at an early stage. It could be used in routine care to provide targeted primary prevention measures to women at particular risk to gain excessive gestational weight.Trial registrationNCT01958307, ClinicalTrials.gov, retrospectively registered 9 October 2013.

Project description:BackgroundAn increasingly large share of diet comes from ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which are assemblages of food substances designed to create durable, convenient and palatable ready-to-eat products. There is increasing evidence that high UPF consumption is indicative of poor diet and is associated with obesity and metabolic disorders. This study sought to examine the relationship between percent of energy intake from ultra-processed foods (PEI-UPF) during pregnancy and maternal gestational weight gain, maternal lipids and glycemia, and neonatal body composition. We also compared the PEI-UPF indicator against the US government's Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010).MethodsData were used from a longitudinal study performed in 2013-2014 at the Women's Health Center and Obstetrics & Gynecology Clinic in St. Louis, MO, USA. Subjects were pregnant women in the normal and obese weight ranges, as well as their newborns (n = 45). PEI-UPF and the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) were calculated for each subject from a one-month food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Multiple regression (ANCOVA-like) analysis was used to analyze the relationship between PEI-UPF or HEI-2010 and various clinical outcomes. The ability of these dietary indices to predict clinical outcomes was also compared with the predictive abilities of total energy intake and total fat intake.ResultsAn average of 54.4 ± 13.2% of energy intake was derived from UPFs. A 1%-point increase in PEI-UPF was associated with a 1.33 kg increase in gestational weight gain (p = 0.016). Similarly, a 1%-point increase in PEI-UPF was associated with a 0.22 mm increase in thigh skinfold (p = 0.045), 0.14 mm in subscapular skinfold (p = 0.026), and 0.62 percentage points of total body adiposity (p = 0.037) in the neonate.DiscussionPEI-UPF (percent of energy intake from ultra-processed foods) was associated with and may be a useful predictor of increased gestational weight gain and neonatal body fat. PEI-UPF was a better predictor of all tested outcomes than either total energy or fat intake, and a better predictor of the three infant body fat measures than HEI-2010. UPF consumption should be limited during pregnancy and diet quality should be maximized in order to improve maternal and neonatal health.

Dataset Information

Relationships between excessive gestational weight gain and energy and macronutrient intake in pregnant women.

Publications

Relationships between excessive gestational weight gain and energy and macronutrient intake in pregnant women.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets