Dataset Information

Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Three-level data arising from repeated measures on individuals who are clustered within larger units are common in health research studies. Missing data are prominent in such longitudinal studies and multiple imputation (MI) is a popular approach for handling missing data. Extensions of joint modelling and fully conditional specification MI approaches based on multilevel models have been developed for imputing three-level data. Alternatively, it is possible to extend single- and two-level MI methods to impute three-level data using dummy indicators and/or by analysing repeated measures in wide format. However, most implementations, evaluations and applications of these approaches focus on the context of incomplete two-level data. It is currently unclear which approach is preferable for imputing three-level data.

Methods

In this study, we investigated the performance of various MI methods for imputing three-level incomplete data when the target analysis model is a three-level random effects model with a random intercept for each level. The MI methods were evaluated via simulations and illustrated using empirical data, based on a case study from the Childhood to Adolescence Transition Study, a longitudinal cohort collecting repeated measures on students who were clustered within schools. In our simulations we considered a number of different scenarios covering a range of different missing data mechanisms, missing data proportions and strengths of level-2 and level-3 intra-cluster correlations.

Results

We found that all of the approaches considered produced valid inferences about both the regression coefficient corresponding to the exposure of interest and the variance components under the various scenarios within the simulation study. In the case study, all approaches led to similar results.

Conclusion

Researchers may use extensions to the single- and two-level approaches, or the three-level approaches, to adequately handle incomplete three-level data. The two-level MI approaches with dummy indicator extension or the MI approaches based on three-level models will be required in certain circumstances such as when there are longitudinal data measured at irregular time intervals. However, the single- and two-level approaches with the DI extension should be used with caution as the DI approach has been shown to produce biased parameter estimates in certain scenarios.

SUBMITTER: Wijesuriya R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7422505 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.

Wijesuriya Rushani R Moreno-Betancur Margarita M Carlin John B JB Lee Katherine J KJ

BMC medical research methodology 20200812 1

<h4>Background</h4>Three-level data arising from repeated measures on individuals who are clustered within larger units are common in health research studies. Missing data are prominent in such longitudinal studies and multiple imputation (MI) is a popular approach for handling missing data. Extensions of joint modelling and fully conditional specification MI approaches based on multilevel models have been developed for imputing three-level data. Alternatively, it is possible to extend single- a ...[more]

PMID: 32787781

Similar Datasets

Project description:There is increasing interest in the study of place effects on health, facilitated in part by geographic information systems. Incomplete or missing address information reduces geocoding success. Several geographic imputation methods have been suggested to overcome this limitation. Accuracy evaluation of these methods can be focused at the level of individuals and at higher group-levels (e.g., spatial distribution).We evaluated the accuracy of eight geo-imputation methods for address allocation from ZIP codes to census tracts at the individual and group level. The spatial apportioning approaches underlying the imputation methods included four fixed (deterministic) and four random (stochastic) allocation methods using land area, total population, population under age 20, and race/ethnicity as weighting factors. Data included more than 2,000 geocoded cases of diabetes mellitus among youth aged 0-19 in four U.S. regions. The imputed distribution of cases across tracts was compared to the true distribution using a chi-squared statistic.At the individual level, population-weighted (total or under age 20) fixed allocation showed the greatest level of accuracy, with correct census tract assignments averaging 30.01% across all regions, followed by the race/ethnicity-weighted random method (23.83%). The true distribution of cases across census tracts was that 58.2% of tracts exhibited no cases, 26.2% had one case, 9.5% had two cases, and less than 3% had three or more. This distribution was best captured by random allocation methods, with no significant differences (p-value > 0.90). However, significant differences in distributions based on fixed allocation methods were found (p-value < 0.0003).Fixed imputation methods seemed to yield greatest accuracy at the individual level, suggesting use for studies on area-level environmental exposures. Fixed methods result in artificial clusters in single census tracts. For studies focusing on spatial distribution of disease, random methods seemed superior, as they most closely replicated the true spatial distribution. When selecting an imputation approach, researchers should consider carefully the study aims.

Project description:Transcriptome wide association studies (TWAS) can be used as a powerful method to identify and interpret the underlying biological mechanisms behind GWAS by mapping gene expression levels with phenotypes. In TWAS, gene expression is often imputed from individual-level genotypes of regulatory variants identified from external resources, such as Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project. In this setting, a straightforward approach to impute expression levels of a specific tissue is to use the model trained from the same tissue type. When multiple tissues are available for the same subjects, it has been demonstrated that training imputation models from multiple tissue types improves the accuracy because of shared eQTLs between the tissues and increase in effective sample size. However, existing joint-tissue methods require access of genotype and expression data across all tissues. Moreover, they cannot leverage the abundance of various expression datasets across various tissues for non-overlapping individuals. Here, we explore the optimal way to combine imputed levels across training models from multiple tissues and datasets in a flexible manner using summary-level data. Our proposed method (SWAM) combines arbitrary number of transcriptome imputation models to linearly optimize the imputation accuracy given a target tissue. By integrating models across tissues and/or individuals, SWAM can improve the accuracy of transcriptome imputation or to improve power to TWAS while only requiring individual-level data from a single reference cohort. To evaluate the accuracy of SWAM, we combined 49 tissue-specific gene expression imputation models from the GTEx Project as well as from a large eQTL study of Depression Susceptibility Genes and Networks (DGN) Project and tested imputation accuracy in GEUVADIS lymphoblastoid cell lines samples. We also extend our meta-imputation method to meta-TWAS to leverage multiple tissues in TWAS analysis with summary-level statistics. Our results capitalize on the importance of integrating multiple tissues to unravel regulatory impacts of genetic variants on complex traits.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets