Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

44 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection: use of a novel bipolar radiofrequency and microwave-powered device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: McCarty TR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7426889 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection: use of a novel bipolar radiofrequency and microwave-powered device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

McCarty Thomas R TR Aihara Hiroyuki H

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20200514 8

PMID: 32821863

Similar Datasets

A Novel Retractable Robotic Device for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Project description:Background/aims: Appropriate tissue tension and clear visibility of the dissection area using traction are essential for effective and safe endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, we developed a retractable robot-assisted traction device and evaluated its performance in colorectal ESD.Methods: An experienced endoscopist performed ESD 18 times on an ex vivo porcine colon using the robot and 18 times using the conventional method. The outcome measures were procedure time, dissection speed, procedure-related adverse events, and blind dissection rate.Results: Thirty-six colonic lesions were resected from ex vivo porcine colon samples. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in robot-assisted ESD (RESD) than in conventional ESD (CESD) (20.1±4.1 minutes vs 34.3±8.3 minutes, p<0.05). The submucosal dissection speed was significantly faster in the RESD group than in the CESD group (36.8±9.2 mm2/min vs 18.1±4.7 mm2/min, p<0.05). The blind dissection rate was also significantly lower in the RESD group (12.8%±3.4% vs 35.1%±3.9%, p<0.05). In an in vivo porcine feasibility study, the robotic device was attached to a colonoscope and successfully inserted into the proximal colon without damaging the colonic wall, and ESD was successfully performed.Conclusions: The dissection speed and safety profile improved significantly with the retractable RESD. Thus, our robotic device has the potential to provide simple, effective, and safe multidirectional traction during colonic ESD.

| S-EPMC11249931 | biostudies-literature

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with use of a bipolar and insulated tip knife.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6620361 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for obstructive lipomas of the foregut and hindgut.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6493476 | biostudies-literature

Modified submucosal tunneling by blunt dissection for peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC11837559 | biostudies-literature

Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as rescue therapy in difficult colorectal cases.

Project description:Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still not widely used due to its technical difficulty and the risk of complications. Rescue therapies such as hybrid ESD (H-ESD) have been proposed for very difficult cases, as has underwater ESD (U-ESD). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of H-ESD and U-ESD in difficult cases. Patients and methods The hospital charts of consecutive patients referred for colorectal ESD between January 2014 and February 2021 because they were considered difficult cases were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome of the study was en bloc resection rate; secondary outcomes were the rate of complete resection, procedure speed, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results Fifty-nine colorectal neoplasms were considered, 22 of which were removed by U-ESD and 37 by H-ESD. The en bloc resection rate in the U-ESD group was 100 %, while it was 59.5 % in the H-ESD group. Dissection speed was 17.7mm 2 /min in the U-ESD group and 8.3 mm 2 /min in the H-ESD group. The AE rate was low in the U-ESD group and moderately high during H-ESD (5 % and 21.6 %, respectively; and perforation rate 0 % and 10.8 %, respectively). Larger lesions were treated with U-ESD, while more fibrotic ones were treated with H-ESD. Conclusions U-ESD and H-ESD are both effective and safe techniques in difficult colorectal situations. U-ESD is particularly effective and fast for large lesions when it is not possible to obtain comfortable knife position, while H-ESD is more suitable for very fibrotic lesions.

| S-EPMC9473857 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and tunneling procedures using novel image-enhanced technique.

Project description:Background and aimsRecent innovations in image-enhanced endoscopy allow early detection and management of GI lesions. In this study, we aim to analyze the utility of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) and red dichromatic imaging (RDI) during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and submucosal tunneling procedures.MethodsPatients who underwent ESD, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) using the novel imaging technique including TXI and RDI were included in the study.ResultsTwenty-five patients (13 male; age 43 ± 15.69 years) underwent POEM for achalasia (n = 20), submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for esophageal subepithelial lesions (n = 3), and ESD for gastric neuroendocrine tumors (n = 2). All of the procedures were successfully performed. Mean procedure duration was 55.52 ± 21.61 minutes. TXI mode was used in all the cases, whereas RDI mode was used on 15 occasions. While using RDI mode, hemostasis was achieved in 1 attempt on 12 (80%) occasions. The site of mucosal incision was revised in 3 cases during POEM based on TXI and RDI modes.ConclusionsSubmucosal tunneling and endoscopic dissection procedures can be conveniently performed using a new image-enhanced technique. RDI is useful in localizing the site of bleeding during endoscopic dissection.

| S-EPMC9347009 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection by using a new traction device.

Project description:Video 1Patient with a history of gastric ectopic pancreas and epigastric pain. We illustrate the endoscopic submucosal dissection of the ectopic pancreas using a new traction device, the ProdiGi traction wire. Using this device, we were able to resect the lesion en bloc with no adverse events.

| S-EPMC8645833 | biostudies-literature

Double-tunneling butterfly method for endoscopic submucosal dissection of extensive rectal neoplasms.

Project description:Background and aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred technique for en bloc resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Resection of extensive lesions with ESD can be challenging, owing to loss of orientation in the submucosal space. In this case series, we describe the double-tunneling (DoT) butterfly method for ESD of extensive rectal neoplasms.MethodsThe key feature of the DoT butterfly method is the creation of 2 tunnels that are transformed into bilateral flaps, leaving a submucosal septum between them.ResultsFour rectal neoplasms measuring (maximum diameter) 7 cm, 8 cm, 9 cm, and 18 cm, respectively, were resected in 4 patients by use of the DoT butterfly method. The lesions included recurrent adenoma (n = 1) and dysplasia (n = 1) in longstanding ulcerative colitis. Curative R0 resection was confirmed in all 4 cases. Histologic examination showed tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia in 1 of 4 patients and focal high-grade dysplasia in 3 of 4 patients. One patient experienced postprocedural bleeding that required endoscopic reintervention.ConclusionThe DoT butterfly method appears to be useful for the resection of extensive rectal neoplasms. A prospective study is required to assess whether these results can be reproduced in a large cohort of patients.

| S-EPMC7004922 | biostudies-literature

A novel clip-band traction device to facilitate colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and defect closure.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7221251 | biostudies-literature

Bridge formation method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10099846 | biostudies-literature