Dataset Information

Laparoscopic versus open herniorrhaphy for children with inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) and open herniorrhaphy (OH) in children with inguinal hernia.

Methods

PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were searched to select trials from their inception till April 2019. The summary of relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to evaluate the treatment effectiveness between LH and OH.

Results

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 594 children were selected. No significant differences were observed between LH and OH regarding the risk of postoperative complications. However, LH significantly reduced the risk of major postoperative complications when compared with OH. Moreover, LH showed association with a shorter operative time in bilateral inguinal hernia when compared with OH, whereas no significant difference between groups for unilateral inguinal hernia. Finally, children who received LH showed association with longer time to discharge than those who received OH, whereas no significant difference was observed between the groups for time to resume full activity.

Conclusions

These findings suggested that children who received LH had protection against major postoperative complications than those who received OH. Moreover, children who received LH had shorter operative time, and longer time to discharge.

SUBMITTER: Liu G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7437831 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Laparoscopic versus open herniorrhaphy for children with inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Liu Guoqing G Zhang Wenxian W Zhou Jianfeng J Sun Bin B Jiang Bin B Wang Hao H

Medicine 20200801 33

<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) and open herniorrhaphy (OH) in children with inguinal hernia.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were searched to select trials from their inception till April 2019. The summary of relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to evaluate the treatment effectiveness between LH and OH.<h4>Res ...[more]

PMID: 32872005

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDespite rapid adoption of the robotic platform for inguinal hernia repair in the US, to date, no level I trials have ever compared robotic inguinal hernia repair to laparoscopic repair. This multicenter randomized clinical trial is the first to compare the robotic platform to laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.ObjectiveTo determine whether the robotic approach to inguinal hernia repair results in improved postoperative outcomes compared with traditional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter, single-blinded, prospective randomized clinical pilot study was conducted from April 2016 to April 2019, with a follow-up duration of 30 days in 6 academic and academic-affiliated sites. Enrolled in this study were 113 patients with a unilateral primary or recurrent inguinal hernia. After exclusions 102 remained for analysis.InterventionsStandard laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair or robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair.Main outcomes and measuresMain outcomes included postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, mobility, wound morbidity, and cosmesis. Secondary outcomes included cost, surgeon ergonomics, and surgeon mental workload. A primary outcome was not selected because this study was designed as a pilot study. The hypothesis was formulated prior to data collection.ResultsA total of 102 patients were included in the study (54 in the laparoscopic group, mean [SD] age, 57.2 [13.3] years and 48 [88.9%] male; 48 in the robotic group, mean [SD] age, 56.1 [14.1] years and 44 [91.6%] male). There were no differences at the preoperative, 1-week, or 30-day points between the groups in terms of wound events, readmissions, pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale, or quality of life as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Compared with traditional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair was associated with longer median (interquartile range) operative times (75.5 [59.0-93.8] minutes vs 40.5 [29.2-63.8] minutes, respectively; P < .001), higher median (interquartile range) cost ($3258 [$2568-$4118] vs $1421 [$1196-$1930], respectively; P < .001), and higher mean (SD) frustration levels on the NASA Task Load Index Scale (range, 1-100, with lower scores indicating lower cognitive workload) (32.7 [23.5] vs 20.1 [19.2], respectively; P = .004). There were no differences in ergonomics of the surgeons between the groups as measured by the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment instrument.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this study showed no clinical benefit to the robotic approach to straightforward inguinal hernia repair compared with the laparoscopic approach. The robotic approach incurred higher costs and more operative time compared with the laparoscopic approach, with added surgeon frustration and no ergonomic benefit to surgeons.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02816658.

Dataset Information

Laparoscopic versus open herniorrhaphy for children with inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Laparoscopic versus open herniorrhaphy for children with inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets