Dataset Information

Robotic LESS and Reduced-Port Hysterectomy Using the da Vinci SP Surgical System: A Single-Institution Case Series.

ABSTRACT: STUDY OBJECTIVE:To present a series of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and reduced-port hysterectomy cases and discuss the surgical technique required for successful use on this new platform. DESIGN:Retrospective case series. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENTS:All patients undergoing robotic LESS or reduced-port hysterectomy with the SP1098 da Vinci SP Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) from December 2019 to March 2020. INTERVENTIONS:Robotic LESS or reduced-port hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:A total of 8 cases of hysterectomy were performed successfully. Four cases included concomitant resection of endometriosis. Five cases required placement of an additional port. The average uterine weight was 136.1 g ± 61.5 g (range 87-246). The average estimated blood loss was 37.5 mL ± 27 mL (range 20-100). The average operative time was 86.5 minutes ± 27.1 minutes (range 60-132). The time required for vaginal cuff closure was available for patients 5 to 8, and ranged from 10 minutes to 13 minutes. All patients had same-day discharge. There were no conversions to alternative surgical modality, complications, or readmissions. CONCLUSION:Our preliminary experience with the SP1098 da Vinci SP Surgical System demonstrated the technical feasibility and safety of this surgical modality for gynecologic surgery. Additional studies examining postoperative outcomes and prospective studies comparing this modality with traditional robotic surgery are indicated.

SUBMITTER: Misal M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7438228 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Robotic LESS and Reduced-Port Hysterectomy Using the da Vinci SP Surgical System: A Single-Institution Case Series.

Misal Meenal M Magtibay Paul M PM Yi Johnny J

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 20200820 5

<h4>Study objective</h4>To present a series of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and reduced-port hysterectomy cases and discuss the surgical technique required for successful use on this new platform.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective case series.<h4>Setting</h4>Academic medical center.<h4>Patients</h4>All patients undergoing robotic LESS or reduced-port hysterectomy with the SP1098 da Vinci SP Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) from December 2019 to March 2020.<h4> ...[more]

PMID: 32827720

Similar Datasets

Project description:The da Vinci® single-port (SP) and multiport (Xi) approaches to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are described by different authors in the literature, primarily comparing short-term outcomes of both modalities. To our knowledge, this is the first article comparing the surgical perspective and satisfaction of patients who underwent RARP with the SP and Xi platforms. To determine the patient surgical perspective and satisfaction in terms of pain control, return to normal activity, and overall results of surgery for two groups who underwent SP and Xi radical prostatectomy. The data from 71 consecutive patients who underwent SP RARP in a single center from June 2019 to April 2020 was compared to 875 patients who underwent Xi RARP in the same period. A single surgeon performed all procedures with a transperitoneal technique. After a propensity score match, two groups of 71 patients (SP and Xi) were selected and compared in the study. Patients were contacted by phone by two interviewers and a questionnaire was administered in English or Spanish. Patients were instructed not to disclose the type of robotic surgery they underwent, as interviewers were blinded to that information. A validated Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8) was used, along with an additional question from our institution asking about the satisfaction with the number of incision sites (GRI-1). Data were analyzed as continuous and discrete variables to compare the differences between the Xi and SP cohorts. A response rate of 85.9% (n = 61) in the Xi group and 73.2% (n = 52) in the SP group was captured. Overall satisfaction with surgical results was 80% and 88% in the Xi and SP cohorts, respectively. No statistical difference in responses was found between the Xi and SP cohorts for SSQ-8. However, GRI-1 demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in terms of number of scars that favors the SP approach. Limitations of this study are the small sample size and recall bias. We found no statistical difference between the groups regarding the answers for SSQ-8 questionnaire; both groups were very satisfied. When assessing the number of incision sites with the GRI-1 question, patients who underwent MP had lower satisfaction rates compared to SP. These patients perceived the number of scars and their appearance as reason for lower satisfaction. We believe that future studies should consider patient's postoperative perspective when adopting new platforms in order to combine adequate treatment with patient expectations. We performed a study assessing the postoperative satisfaction and perspectives of two groups of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with two different robots (SP and Xi). There was no difference in patient satisfaction with the results of either the da Vinci® SP or Xi RARP except for the patients' perception on their number of scars, which favored the SP group.

Project description:ObjectiveThe limitations of tissue retraction and the amount of surgical working space have a great impact on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (sp-RARP) with the multiport robotic surgical system. We used an extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique to achieve tissue exposure and working space expansion. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique in extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP with the da Vinci Si surgical system.MethodsData from 42 patients were analyzed retrospectively from December 2018 to February 2020. The extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique was not used in 20 patients (group I) and was used in 22 patients (group II). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The oncological and functional data during late follow-up were recorded.ResultsAll patients successfully underwent extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP. No patients required conversion to a multiport surgery or placement of additional assistant ports. The two groups were similar regarding baseline features. The median operation time in group I was significantly longer than that in group II (P < 0.001). The estimated blood loss volume in group I was significantly higher than that in group II (P < 0.001). There were no serious complications in either group. There were four cases of peritoneal tears in group I and none in group II (P = 0.043). The surgical margin and lymph nodes were negative in both groups. The oncological and functional outcomes were similar between the two groups 6 months after the procedure.ConclusionsThe extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique is safe and feasible. The technique promotes tissue exposure and expands the surgical working space, which is important for achieving extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP with the da Vinci Si surgical system, especially for beginners. The short-term oncological and functional outcomes were within acceptable ranges. The long-term effects of this technique need further evaluation.

Dataset Information

Robotic LESS and Reduced-Port Hysterectomy Using the da Vinci SP Surgical System: A Single-Institution Case Series.

Publications

Robotic LESS and Reduced-Port Hysterectomy Using the da Vinci SP Surgical System: A Single-Institution Case Series.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets