Dataset Information

Interrupting traumatic memories in the emergency department: a randomized controlled pilot study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The hours immediately following a traumatic event may present a window of opportunity to interrupt the consolidation of memories of the traumatic event, and this may prevent PTSD development. This theory has been validated in a series of analogue studies, showing that a visuo-spatial task reduces intrusive memories, however clinical studies are scarce.

Objective

This pilot RCT examined the use of a semi-immersive Virtual Reality visuospatial task, as an intervention to interrupt memory consolidation, in the Emergency Department (ED) in the immediate hours following a traumatic event. We hypothesised that participants who had received the intervention would present with lower levels of PTSD symptoms than the control group who received no intervention.

Method

Seventy-seven adult survivors of traumatic events, meeting study criteria, were recruited in the ED of a Level III Trauma Centre. Survivors arrived at the ED less than one hour, on average, after the trauma. After signing informed consent, participants were randomized to the SnowWorld intervention or control group. Both groups completed self-report questionnaires, and the intervention group used SnowWorld for up to 10 minutes.

Results

No significant differences between the intervention and control groups were found regarding PTSD symptom levels two weeks and six months following the traumatic event.

Conclusions

These results add to the growing literature examining the use of a concurrent task to reduce intrusions following a traumatic event. In contrast to previous clinical studies, this study did not show significant group differences; however, it replicates an analogue study that used a specifically developed app. Further studies are needed to elucidate possible reasons for these conflicting results.

SUBMITTER: Freedman SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7448922 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:For patients with advanced cancer, visits to the emergency department (ED) are common. Such patients present to the ED with a specific profile of palliative care needs, including burdensome symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, or vomiting that cannot be controlled in other settings and a lack of well-defined goals of care. The goals of this study are: i) to test the feasibility of recruiting, enrolling, and randomizing patients with serious illness in the ED; and ii) to evaluate the impact of ED-initiated palliative care on health care utilization, quality of life, and survival. METHODS/DESIGN:This is a protocol for a single center parallel, two-arm randomized controlled trial in ED patients with metastatic solid tumors comparing ED-initiated palliative care referral to a control group receiving usual care. We plan to enroll 125 to 150 ED-advanced cancer patients at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, USA, who meet the following criteria: i) pass a brief cognitive screen; ii) speak fluent English or Spanish; and iii) have never been seen by palliative care. We will use balanced block randomization in groups of 50 to assign patients to the intervention or control group after completion of a baseline questionnaire. All research staff performing assessment or analysis will be blinded to patient assignment. We will measure the impact of the palliative care intervention on the following outcomes: i) timing and rate of palliative care consultation; ii) quality of life and depression at 12 weeks, measured using the FACT-G and PHQ-9; iii) health care utilization; and iv) length of survival. The primary analysis will be based on intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION:This pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility of recruiting, enrolling, and randomizing patients with advanced cancer in the ED, and provide a preliminary estimate of the impact of palliative care referral on health care utilization, quality of life, and survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT01358110 (Entered 5/19/2011).

Project description:ObjectiveTraditional treatment of abscesses in the emergency department includes packing with gauze; however, this can add pain and discomfort to the procedure and frequently involves a follow-up visit for packing removal. Alternatives to gauze packing have been proposed, but they may have disadvantages in the context of emergency care. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the use of a novel silicone packing device - the Derma-Stent.MethodsThis was a randomized controlled pilot study of 50 patients from two urban emergency departments with uncomplicated superficial abscesses. The primary outcome was the likelihood of self-removal of packing gauze versus the silicone device. Secondary outcome measures included subjective clinician and patient metrics, such as pain and ease of use.ResultsPatients identified with simple cutaneous abscesses were randomized to intervention (packing with the novel silicone device, n=25) or standard care (gauze packing, n=25). Mean age was 36 years, 54% were female, and 96% identified as African American. Although it took longer to place, the silicone device (19.0 vs 15.3 minutes, p=0.03), pain scores were significantly lower (4.3/10 vs 7.1/10, p=0.008) and ease of use reported by physicians better in the silicone-device group (4.8/5 vs 4.0/5, p=0.002). A high unknown rate in the gauze-packing group limits discussion of the likelihood of self-removal; however, the silicone device was more likely to remain in place (60%) versus the gauze packing at 3 days (24%, p=0.01).ConclusionThis pilot randomized controlled trial compared the treatment of packing cutaneous abscesses with gauze versus using the silicone device. Limitations in the data prevent discussion on likelihood of self-removal. However, the silicone device was more likely to remain in place at day 3 follow-up and was equally effective to gauze packing in abscess reduction while also improving patient-reported pain scores. It did take longer to place the silicone device; however, physicians reported better ease of use and removal. This pilot study is encouraging for additional larger-scale trials that are required to further assess the utility of this device in the emergency department.