Genomic and Immune Profiling of a Patient With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus PD-L1 Blockade.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Casadevall D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7450962 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Genomic and Immune Profiling of a Patient With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus PD-L1 Blockade.
Casadevall David D Li Xiaotong X Powles Ryan L RL Wali Vikram B VB Buza Natalia N Pelekanou Vasiliki V Dhawan Arjun A Foldi Julia J Szekely Borbala B Lopez-Giraldez Francesc F Hatzis Christos C Pusztai Lajos L
JCO precision oncology 20190510
Similar Datasets
Project description:PurposeThe tumor immune microenvironment can change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We aimed to investigate the effects of NAC on PD-L1 (SP142) status and its clinical significance in TNBC.MethodsPaired samples of biopsy and resection specimens were collected from 182 patients with TNBC before and after NAC. PD-L1 (SP142) expression in immune cells in pre- and post-NAC breast cancer samples and the changes between them were analyzed, along with their relationships with the clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of the patients.ResultsOf the 182 patients, 61 (33.5%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC. PD-L1 (SP142) positivity, defined as immune cell staining in ≥ 1% of tumor area, was a predictor for pCR. PD-L1-positive immune cells significantly increased after NAC (2.8% to 5.2% on average) in 109 patients with measurable residual disease. Alteration of PD-L1 status was observed in 24 (22.0%) of the 109 patients with measurable residual tumors after NAC, and all PD-L1 status-converted patients, except one, revealed negative-to-positive conversion. Regarding chemotherapeutic agents, the use of platinum agents was associated with a significant increase in PD-L1-positive immune cells after NAC. In survival analyses, a positive PD-L1 status after NAC and increase of PD-L1-positive immune cells after NAC were associated with better recurrence-free survival of the patients.ConclusionPD-L1 (SP142) status changes after NAC, mostly as a positive conversion. As PD-L1 (SP142) status can convey prognostic and predictive information, it needs to be tested before and after NAC.
| S-EPMC11297096 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11535811 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAdvanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents significant therapeutic challenges, particularly in Asian populations, which exhibit distinct biological and genetic characteristics. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising approach; however, its efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone remains under investigation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (PIC) versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced TNBC in Asian patients.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed across six databases for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only studies comparing the outcomes of PIC versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced TNBC, including subgroup analyses of Asian populations, were included. Data were pooled to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), responses, and safety profiles.ResultsA total of 1041 patients from five phase 3 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Compared to chemotherapy alone, PIC therapy significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74 [0.62, 0.88], P = 0.0008). No significant difference was observed in OS (HR: 0.78 [0.55, 1.12], P = 0.18), although a slight trend favoring PIC therapy was noted. Among PD-L1-positive patients, both OS (HR: 0.62 [0.44, 0.86], P = 0.005) and PFS (HR: 0.66 [0.50, 0.86], P = 0.003) were significantly improved in the PIC group. The PIC group also exhibited a substantially higher OS rate at 12-36 months and a higher PFS rate at 6-30 months. However, the incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) (risk ratio [RR]: 1.69 [1.33, 2.15], P < 0.0001) and grade 3-5 irAEs (RR: 3.11 [1.59, 6.10], P = 0.001) was significantly higher in the PIC group. The most common irAEs in the PIC group were hypothyroidism (14.40%), dermatitis (10.00%), and infusion reactions (8.85%). Both treatment groups exhibited similar response rates and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).ConclusionsIn Asian patients with advanced TNBC, PIC significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Although the combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of irAEs, its clinical benefits support its use as a viable treatment option for this population.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024622428.
| S-EPMC11906427 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by a high rate of systemic metastasis, insensitivity to conventional treatment and susceptibility to drug resistance, resulting in a poor patient prognosis. The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represented by antibodies of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) have provided new therapeutic options for TNBC. However, the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy is suboptimal immune response, which may be caused by reduced antigen presentation, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, interplay with other immune checkpoints and aberrant activation of oncological signaling in tumor cells. Therefore, to improve the sensitivity of TNBC to ICIs, suitable patients are selected based on reliable predictive markers and treated with a combination of ICIs with other therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, oncologic virus and neoantigen-based therapies. This review discusses the current mechanisms underlying the resistance of TNBC to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and recent advances in the combination therapies to increase response rates, the depth of remission and the durability of the benefit of TNBC to ICIs.
| S-EPMC9817764 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The present work was an endeavor to shed light on how mild photothermia possibly synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibition for tumor therapy. We established mild photothermal heating protocols to generate temperatures of 43 °C and 45 °C in both in vitro and in vivo mouse 4T1 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) models using polyglycerol-coated carbon nanohorns (CNH-PG) and 808 nm laser irradiation. Next, we found that 1) CNH-PG-mediated mild photothermia (CNH-PG-mPT) significantly increased expression of the immune checkpoint PD-L1 and type-1 macrophage (M1) markers in the TNBC tumors; 2) CNH-PG-mPT had a lower level of anti-tumor efficacy which was markedly potentiated by BMS-1, a PD-L1 blocker. These observations prompted us to explore the synergetic mechanisms of CNH-PG-mPT and BMS-1 in the context of tumor cell-macrophage interactions mediated by PD-L1 since tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a major source of PD-L1 expression in tumors. In vitro, the study then identified two dimensions where BMS-1 potentiated CNH-PG-mPT. First, CNH-PG-mPT induced PD-L1 upregulation in the tumor cells and showed a low level of cytotoxicity which was potentiated by BMS-1. Second, CNH-PG-mPT skewed TAMs towards an M1-like anti-tumor phenotype with upregulated PD-L1, and BMS-1 bolstered the M1-like phenotype. The synergistic effects of BMS-1 and CNH-PG-mPT both on the tumor cells and TAMs were more pronounced when the two cell populations were in co-culture. Further in vivo study confirmed PD-L1 upregulation both in tumor cells and TAMs in the TNBC tumors following treatment of CNH-PG-mPT. Significantly, TAMs depletion largely abolished the anti-TNBC efficacy of CNH-PG-mPT alone and in synergy with BMS-1. Collectively, our findings reveal PD-L1 upregulation to be a key response of TNBC to mild photothermal stress, which plays a pro-survival role in the tumor cells while also acting as a brake on the M1-like activation of the TAMs. Blockade of mPT‑induced PD‑L1 achieves synergistic anti-TNBC efficacy by taking the intrinsic survival edge off the tumor cells on one hand and taking the brakes off the M1-like TAMs on the other. Our findings reveal a novel way (i.e. mild thermia plus PD-L1 blockade) to modulate the TAMs-tumor cell interaction to instigate a mutiny of the TAMs against their host tumor cells.
| S-EPMC10712197 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, as a treatment for many tumors, has shown good efficacy. However, responses to immunotherapy did not always occur or last long., i.e. primary or acquired resistance, even tumors were PD-L1 positive. Several oncogenic pathways, including PI3K/AKT activation by PTEN loss and NF-κB activation, induce PD-L1 expression and PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance. They also induce expression of CCL2, an inhibitory chemokine that blocks T cell tracking into the tumor by binding to CCR2 on the T cell surface. In this study, we showed that transglutaminase 2 (TG2), a post-translational modification enzyme, induced ubiquitin-proteasome dependent degradation of tumor suppressors including PTEN and IκBα by peptide cross-linking, inducing CCL2 as well as PD-L1 expression via PI3K/AKT and NF-κB activation. It also induced PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance because CCL2 was expressed despite increased PD-L1, which was blocked by PD-L1 inhibitor. We also revealed that inhibition of TG2, instead of PD-L1, restored T cell-dependent killing effect by blocking expression of both PD-L1 and CCL2 in PD-L1(+) triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. In addition, the TG2-expressing TNBC patient group showed higher PD-L1 expression incidence than did the TG2-negative TNBC patient group. In conclusion, TG2 induces primary PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance by inducing CCL2 expression. TG2 blockade can be utilized as an excellent therapeutic strategy to overcome PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance in PD-L1(+) TNBC patients. Our study suggested that PD-L1 expression alone might not always be a predictive biomarker for PD-L1(+) TNBC, but TG2 could be a useful predictive marker to select PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant TNBC patients.
| S-EPMC7539780 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immune checkpoint therapy is being tested in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with localized urothelial carcinoma1,2, with one study reporting data in cisplatin-ineligible patients who received anti-PD-L1 monotherapy2. The study reported that patients with bulky tumors, a known high-risk feature defined as greater than clinical T2 disease, had fewer responses, with pathological complete response rate of 17%2. Here we report on the first pilot combination neoadjuvant trial ( NCT02812420 ) with anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) plus anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) in cisplatin-ineligible patients, with all tumors identified as having high-risk features (n = 28). High-risk features were defined by bulky tumors, variant histology, lymphovascular invasion, hydronephrosis and/or high-grade upper tract disease3-5. The primary endpoint was safety and we observed 6 of 28 patients (21%) with grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events, consisting of asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities (n = 4), hepatitis and colitis (n = 2). We also observed pathological complete response of 37.5% and downstaging to pT1 or less in 58% of patients who completed surgery (n = 24). In summary, we provide initial safety, efficacy and biomarker data with neoadjuvant combination anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, which warrants further development for patients with localized urothelial carcinoma, especially cisplatin-ineligible patients with high-risk features who do not currently have an established standard-of-care neoadjuvant treatment.
| S-EPMC9768836 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWe report the results of a phase II, randomized, window-of-opportunity trial of neoadjuvant durvalumab versus durvalumab plus tremelimumab followed by surgery in patients with resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM; NCT02592551).Patients and methodsThe primary objective was alteration of the intratumoral CD8/regulatory T cell (Treg) ratio after combination immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included other changes in the tumor microenvironment, survival, safety, tumor pathologic response (PR), and systemic immune responses.ResultsNine patients received monotherapy and 11 received combination therapy. Seventeen of the 20 patients (85%) receiving ICB underwent planned thoracotomy. Both ICB regimens induced CD8 T-cell infiltration into MPM tumors but did not alter CD8/Treg ratios. At 34.1 months follow-up, patients receiving combination ICB had longer median overall survival (not reached) compared with those receiving monotherapy (14.0 months). Grade ≥3 immunotoxicity occurred in 8% of patients in the monotherapy group and 27% of patients in the combination group. Tumor PR occurred in 6 of 17 patients receiving ICB and thoracotomy (35.3%), among which major PR (>90% tumor regression) occurred in 2 (11.8%). Single-cell profiling of tumor, blood, and bone marrow revealed that combination ICB remodeled the immune contexture of MPM tumors; mobilized CD57+ effector memory T cells from the bone marrow to the circulation; and increased the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures in MPM tumors that were rich in CD57+ T cells.ConclusionsThese data indicate that neoadjuvant durvalumab plus tremelimumab orchestrates de novo systemic immune responses that extend to the tumor microenvironment and correlate with favorable clinical outcomes.
| S-EPMC9898180 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The consequences of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for PD-L1 activity in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are not well-understood. This is an important issue as PD-LI might act as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors' (ICI) efficacy, at a time where ICI are undergoing rapid development and could be beneficial in patients who do not achieve a pathological complete response. We used immunohistochemistry to assess PD-L1 expression in surgical specimens (E1L3N clone, cutoff for positivity: ≥1%) on both tumor (PD-L1-TC) and immune cells (PD-L1-IC) from a cohort of T1-T3NxM0 TNBCs treated with NAC. PD-L1-TC was detected in 17 cases (19.1%) and PD-L1-IC in 14 cases (15.7%). None of the baseline characteristics of the tumor or the patient were associated with PD-L1 positivity, except for pre-NAC stromal TIL levels, which were higher in post-NAC PD-L1-TC-positive than in negative tumors. PD-L1-TC were significantly associated with a higher residual cancer burden (p = 0.035) and aggressive post-NAC tumor characteristics, whereas PD-L1-IC were not. PD-L1 expression was not associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (PD-L1-TC, p = 0.25, and PD-L1-IC, p = 0.95) or overall survival (OS) (PD-L1-TC, p = 0.48, and PD-L1-IC, p = 0.58), but high Ki67 levels after NAC were strongly associated with a poor prognosis (RFS, p = 0.0014, and OS, p = 0.001). A small subset of TNBC patients displaying PD-L1 expression in the context of an extensive post-NAC tumor burden could benefit from ICI treatment after standard NAC.
| S-EPMC7916886 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to chemotherapy (CT) has become a research hotspot in the therapy of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Nevertheless, controversial results have been revealed among the published randomized controlled trials. Hence, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the therapeutic effect of this treatment regimen.MethodsFive English databases (PubMed, WOS, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase), and four Chinese databases (CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang), as well as oncological meetings, were systematically searched to identify eligible studies that assessed the addition of ICI to CT versus CT alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using fixed- or random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were also performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-positive individuals.ResultsAll told there are five eligible randomized controlled trials involving 3,000 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Compared with CT alone, the ICI plus CT regimen significantly increased PFS in the ITT (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88) and PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79) populations, as well as OS in the ITT (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) and PD-L1-positive populations (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.91). Moreover, the PFS of sufferers treated with the combination strategy of ICI with CT increased alongside PD-L1 enrichment. A clinical benefit in terms of objective response rate was also distinctly observed in both populations treated with ICI plus CT. In the subgroup analysis, patients in the no prior CT subgroup experienced a striking increase in PFS in both populations; however, a difference was not observed in other subgroups.ConclusionsThe combination strategy striking improves PFS and OS in both ITT and PD-L1-positive populations, and PFS is prolonged with PD-L1 enrichment. Patients who do not receive CT prior to this treatment are associated with longer PFS in both populations.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42021289817.
| S-EPMC10884307 | biostudies-literature