Dataset Information

Pharmacists' Knowledge About the Impact of Augmented Renal Clearance on Antimicrobial Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Broad-spectrum antibiotics are commonly prescribed in critically ill patients. While it is commonly believed that only patients with impaired renal function need dose adjustment, augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon that warrants dose adjustment as well. In critically ill patients ARC is often undetectable because it is associated with a normal or decreased serum creatinine concentration (SCr). This study's objective was to assess pharmacists' knowledge about ARC identification, risk factors, affected antimicrobials, and dosing of antibiotics in patients with ARC.

Methods

In January 2020, we carried out a cross-sectional study by sending out an online survey to the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, Kuwait Pharmaceutical Association, and Oman Pharmaceutical Society. Due to the expected low response rate, we administered an electronic questionnaire to pharmacists attending Dubai International Pharmaceuticals and Technologies Conference and Exhibition 2020 (DUPHAT).

Results

Data were collected from 288 respondents. However, only 134 were included in the final analysis following the exclusion of incomplete responses, no experience working in in-patient settings, and respondents who chose "no" universal ARC definition. Those who chose "yes" or "I do not know" regarding the universal definition of ARC were asked about SCr status in ARC. Elevation in SCr was chosen by 67/134 (50%) compared to those who chose decreased or normal (48/134, 35.8%). Regarding risk factors, only 1/134 (0.7%) respondent selected all risk factors. Two/134 (1.4%) respondents chose all hydrophilic antibiotics that are likely to be affected by ARC. Concerning the appropriate dose and frequency of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem, they were selected by 60.4% and 30.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

Pharmacists' knowledge about ARC was limited. Implementation of educational programs targeting hospital pharmacists, especially those practicing in critical care settings, and developing antimicrobial institutional guidelines are important.

SUBMITTER: Almulhim AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7452990 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Dose optimization of novel β-lactam antibiotics (NBLA) has become necessary given the increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections in intensive care units coupled with the limited number of available treatment options. Unfortunately, recommended dose regimens of NBLA based on PK/PD indices are not well-defined for critically ill patients presenting with special situations (i.e., obesity, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), augmented renal clearance (ARC), and renal replacement therapies (RRT)). This review aimed to discuss and summarize the available literature on the PK/PD attained indices of NBLA among critically ill patients with special circumstances. PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Embase databases were searched for studies published between January 2011 and May 2022. Articles relevant to NBLA (i.e., ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftobiprole, imipenem/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam) were selected. The MeSH terms of "obesity", "augmented renal clearance", "renal replacement therapy", "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation", "pharmacokinetic", "pharmacodynamic" "critically ill", and "intensive care" were used for identification of articles. The search was limited to adult humans' studies that were published in English. A narrative synthesis of included studies was then conducted accordingly. Available evidence surrounding the use of NBLA among critically ill patients presenting with special situations was limited by the small sample size of the included studies coupled with high heterogeneity. The PK/PD target attainments of NBLA were reported to be minimally affected by obesity and/or ECMO, whereas the effect of renal functionality (in the form of either ARC or RRT) was more substantial. Critically ill patients presenting with special circumstances might be at risk of altered NBLA pharmacokinetics, particularly in the settings of ARC and RRT. More robust, well-designed trials are still required to define effective dose regimens able to attain therapeutic PK/PD indices of NBLA when utilized in those special scenarios, and thus aid in improving the patients' outcomes.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveClinical practice guidelines recommend delivering a continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) dose of 20 to 25mL/kg/h. However, practice patterns nationwide are highly variable; this inconsistent prescribing may lead to errors in medication dosing and increase rates of electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities. We describe an initiative to standardize CRRT practice patterns and reduce dosing variability.Study designQuality improvement study.Setting & participantsAdult patients treated with CRRT at the University of Colorado Hospital between January 2016 and October 2017.Quality improvement activitiesAn assessment of the magnitude of the variability in CRRT dosing and the following specific interventions were implemented during the course of 1 year: (1) modification of the electronic medical record (EMR) to include calculated average 24-hour dose in real time, (2) modification of the CRRT procedure note to include comments on dosing, (3) modification of the CRRT order set to display calculations, and (4) yearly educational sessions for renal fellows outlining CRRT-specific dosing targets.OutcomesThe primary outcome was weekly percentage of CRRT treatments with an average delivered daily dose of 20 to 25mL/kg/h. Process and balancing outcomes included CRRT flowsheet accuracy, documentation of rates of delivered dose, and nursing satisfaction.Analytical approachRates of weekly CRRT dosing in compliance with national guidelines were determined and used to create run charts showing compliance rates before and after the quality improvement interventions.ResultsAmong 837 treatments before the intervention, 279 (33%) daily CRRT sessions achieved an average dose of 20 to 25mL/kg/h. Following implementation of interventions, 631 of 952 (66%) treatments achieved this goal. Week-to-week variation in dosing was significantly reduced.LimitationsA single-center study generating data that may not be generalizable to institutions with different CRRT nursing models or different EMR systems.ConclusionsChanges to the EMR and documentation templates and education of CRRT providers about dosing were associated with doubling of the rate of appropriate CRRT dosing and reduction in dosing variability.