Dataset Information

A qualitative evaluation of Pesky gNATs in primary care - The experiences of assistant psychologists providing computer-assisted CBT to children experiencing low mood and anxiety.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Technology-assisted cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recognized as an evidence-based and cost-effective way to address psychological difficulties in children. Increasingly, these interventions are provided by staff with different levels of psychological training, such as assistant psychologists (APs). However, there is limited qualitative understanding regarding their experiences of providing technology-assisted CBT.

Method

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with APs (n = 14) in primary care settings in Ireland. This qualitative evaluation is part of an ongoing RCT for the CBT game Pesky gNATs (O'Reilly and Coyle, 2015). All data were inductively analysed using qualitative thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke (2006).

Results

Five overarching themes were identified: 1) positive experiences, 2) integrating Pesky gNATs with traditional CBT, 3) managing parental 'buy-in', 4) implementation complexities, and 5) future perspectives. Two subthemes were reported for each overarching theme: benefits for children, AP professional growth, facilitating engagement, different child characteristics, unclear role for parents, child autonomy, managing waitlists, external factors, design considerations and advice to future APs.

Conclusions

Pesky gNATs is well-received by APs in primary care, and is mostly experienced as helpful by both APs and children. However, a number of factors may be impacting the ability of APs to effectively provide the intervention.

SUBMITTER: McCashin D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7458094 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCompared to the evidence base for adult populations, less is known about the effectiveness of technology-assisted CBT interventions for children aged 12 and under in real-world settings.AimsThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a technology-assisted CBT intervention called Pesky gNATs in primary care psychology services.MethodsA 2 × 3 (group by time) waitlist randomised controlled trial design was applied (n = 122), using the total internalising score from the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) as the primary outcome measure; and a range of secondary outcomes. Participants were recruited from primary care services across Ireland and were assessed at baseline (Time 1), post-intervention (Time 2), and a follow-up at 3 months (Time 3). Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyse the data; in addition to Cohen's d for effect sizes, and the reliable change index (RCI) for clinically meaningful change.ResultsOverall, no significant between-group differences were found on primary or secondary measures. Both intervention and waitlist control groups experienced significantly positive change across all timepoints. However, participant retention rate at Time 2 was 66%; and fell to 44% at Time 3. Intervention group feedback from children and parent at Time 2 indicated high levels of acceptability and satisfaction with Pesky gNATs. The RCI showed a statistically significant result at Time 2: more participants from the intervention group (n = 9) moved from clinical to non-clinical levels on the primary outcome than did waitlist control participants (n = 0); but no differences were found at Time 3.ConclusionThis RCT did not demonstrate that Pesky gNATs is effective in providing clinically significant levels of change for low mood and anxiety. However, participant feedback showed high levels of acceptability and positive experiences However, given the high attrition rate and implementation challenges, further research is required to ascertain the effectiveness of technology-assisted CBT interventions such as Pesky gNATs.

Project description:BackgroundThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is offered to all patients with a psychosis diagnosis. However, only a minority of psychosis patients in England and Wales are offered CBTp. This is attributable, in part, to the resource-intensive nature of CBTp. One response to this problem has been the development of CBTp in brief formats that are targeted at a single symptom and the mechanisms that maintain distress. We have developed a brief form of CBTp for distressing voices and reported preliminary evidence for its effectiveness when delivered by highly trained therapists (clinical psychologists). This study will investigate the delivery of this intervention by a cost-effective workforce of assistant psychologists following a brief training and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a future, definitive, randomised controlled trial (RCT).MethodsThis is a feasibility study for a pragmatic, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority 1:1:1 RCT comparing a Guided self-help CBT intervention for voices and treatment as usual (GiVE) to Supportive Counselling and treatment as usual (SC) to treatment as usual alone (TAU), recruiting across two sites, with blinded post-treatment and follow-up assessments. A process evaluation will quantitatively and qualitatively explore stakeholder experience.DiscussionExpected outcomes will include an assessment of the feasibility of conducting a definitive RCT, and data to inform the calculation of its sample size. If evidence from a subsequent, fully powered RCT suggests that GiVE is clinically and cost-effective when delivered by briefly trained assistant psychologists, CBTp offered in these less resource-intensive forms has the potential to generate benefits for individual patients (reduced distress, enhanced recovery and enhanced quality of life), service-level patient benefit (increased access to evidence-based psychological therapies) and economic benefits to the NHS (in terms of the reduced use of mental health inpatient services).Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials, ISRCTN registration number: 16166070. Registered on 5 February 2019.

Project description:Tactile sensory input of surgeons is severely limited in minimally invasive surgery, therefore manual palpation cannot be performed for intraoperative tumor detection. Computer-aided palpation, in which tactile information is acquired by devices and relayed to the surgeon, is one solution for overcoming this limitation. An important design factor is the method by which the acquired information is fed back to the surgeon. However, currently there is no systematic method for achieving this aim, and it is possible that a badly implemented feedback mechanism could adversely affect the performance of the surgeon. In this study, we propose an assistance algorithm for intraoperative tumor detection in laparoscopic surgery. Our scenario is that the surgeon manipulates a sensor probe, makes a decision based on the feedback provided from the sensor, while simultaneously, the algorithm analyzes the time series of the sensor output. Thus, the algorithm assists the surgeon in making decisions by providing independent detection results. A deep neural network model with three hidden layers was used to analyze the sensor output. We propose methods to input the time series of the sensor output to the model for real-time analysis, and to determine the criterion for detection by the model. This study aims to validate the feasibility of the algorithm by using data acquired in our previous psychophysical experiment. There, novice participants were asked to detect a phantom of an early-stage gastric tumor through visual feedback from the tactile sensor. In addition to the analysis of the accuracy, signal detection theory was employed to assess the potential detection performance of the model. The detection performance was compared with that of human participants. We conducted two types of validation, and found that the detection performance of the model was not significantly different from that of the human participants if the data from a known user was included in the model construction. The result supports the feasibility of the proposed algorithm for detection assistance in computer-aided palpation.

Project description:ObjectivesLittle is known about the experiences of therapists delivering psychotherapy for patients with dissociative seizures (DS), a complex disorder associated with a range of comorbid psychosocial and mental health difficulties. This study set out to explore therapists' experiences of delivering DS-specific, manualized cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to adults with DS within the context of a randomized control trial.MethodsInterviews were conducted with 12 therapists involved in the COgnitive behavioral therapy vs standardized medical care for adults with Dissociative non-Epileptic Seizures (CODES) trial and were analyzed using thematic framework analysis (TFA).ResultsSix main themes emerged, namely 1) aspects of the intervention that were favored, while others were not always considered applicable; 2) multiple and complex difficulties faced by patients; 3) working effectively within the protocol; 4) limitations of the protocol; 5) significance of formulation; and 6) quality of standardized medical care (SMC) and difficulties of diagnosis delivery. These addressed valued aspects of the intervention, complexities of the patient group, and experiences working within a structured treatment protocol. Family involvement and psychoeducation were highlighted as important components; the applicability of graded exposure techniques, however, was restricted by patients' apparent emotional avoidance. The structure provided by the treatment protocol was valued, but flexibility was important to individualize treatment in complex cases. A comprehensive formulation was fundamental to this. The initial diagnostic explanation provided by neurologists and psychiatrists was generally considered beneficial, with patients often perceived to enter therapy with a better understanding of their condition.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the DS-specific CBT intervention met with general approval from therapists who also highlighted some practical challenges. Because of the nature of the condition, the need for experience of working with complex patients should be considered when applying the intervention to individual cases. Setting the CBT intervention in the context of a structured care pathway involving neurology and psychiatry may facilitate the therapeutic process.

Project description:We provide aggregate data about income, demographics, and life experiences of women and men practicing clinical-forensic psychology primarily in the United States (N = 376). We examine how these variables relate to one another, as well as how gender demographics of the field have changed over time. The average hourly rate charged by psychologists for forensic work, aggregated across all types of referral questions, regions, and employment settings is $280.23 (US Dollars; SD = $108.12; median and mode = $250). Total median annual income is = $125,000 - $149,999 and mode is = $100,000 - $124,999. Men's annual income (median = $175,000 - $199,000) is significantly higher than women's (median = $100,000 - $124,999) even while controlling for years of experience and number of hours worked per week. Women forensic psychologists earn $0.83 for every $1.00 men make. Having a Ph.D. is disproportionately associated with men and PsyD with women; however, the difference is not significant once controlling for years of experience. Employment type related to pay, such that people in private practice make significantly more than those who work in institutions (e.g., prisons, hospitals) or universities. Year of highest degree associated with employment type, such that people in practice longer are more likely to be in private practice. Although we expected caretaking responsibilities and children would relate to gender and pay, no differences emerged in this sample. Women are more likely than men to have completed a formal postdoctoral fellowship in forensic psychology, even when controlling for year of highest degree. Regarding the gender composition of the field over time, we calculated the Index of Dissimilarity for each five year increment spanning 1965-2019. Before the late 1990s, proportionally more men entered the field; after the late 1990s, proportionally more women entered. We discuss the promising and less promising implications of these findings for gender equity and work-life management in forensic psychology, as well as how professionals in the field and students might make use of these data.