Dataset Information

Comparison of BRAF Mutation Screening Strategies in a Large Real-Life Series of Advanced Melanoma Patients.

ABSTRACT: Malignant melanoma (MM) is one of the deadliest skin cancers. BRAF mutation status plays a predominant role in the management of MM patients. The aim of this study was to compare BRAF mutational testing performed by conventional nucleotide sequencing approaches with either real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays in a real-life, hospital-based series of advanced MM patients. Consecutive patients with AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage IIIC and IV MM from Sardinia, Italy, who were referred for molecular testing, were enrolled into the study. Initial screening was performed to assess the mutational status of the BRAF and NRAS genes, using the conventional methodologies recognized by the nationwide guidelines, at the time of the molecular classification, required by clinicians: at the beginning, Sanger-based sequencing (SS) and, after, pyrosequencing. The present study was then focused on BRAF mutation detecting approaches only. BRAF wild-type cases with available tissue and adequate DNA were further tested with rtPCR (Idylla™) and NGS assays. Globally, 319 patients were included in the study; pathogenic BRAF mutations were found in 144 (45.1%) cases examined with initial screening. The rtPCR detected 11 (16.2%) and 3 (4.8%) additional BRAF mutations after SS and pyrosequencing, respectively. NGS detected one additional BRAF-mutated case (2.1%) among 48 wild-type cases previously tested with pyrosequencing and rtPCR. Our study evidenced that rtPCR and NGS were able to detect additional BRAF mutant cases in comparison with conventional sequencing methods; therefore, we argue for the preferential utilization of the aforementioned assays (NGS and rtPCR) in clinical practice, to eradicate false-negative cases and improve the accuracy of BRAF detection.

SUBMITTER: Colombino M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7464760 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of BRAF Mutation Screening Strategies in a Large Real-Life Series of Advanced Melanoma Patients.

Colombino Maria M Rozzo Carla C Paliogiannis Panagiotis P Casula Milena M Manca Antonella A Doneddu Valentina V Fedeli Maria Antonietta MA Sini Maria Cristina MC Palomba Grazia G Pisano Marina M Ascierto Paolo A PA Caracò Corrado C Lissia Amelia A Cossu Antonio A Palmieri Giuseppe G

Journal of clinical medicine 20200730 8

Malignant melanoma (MM) is one of the deadliest skin cancers. BRAF mutation status plays a predominant role in the management of MM patients. The aim of this study was to compare BRAF mutational testing performed by conventional nucleotide sequencing approaches with either real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays in a real-life, hospital-based series of advanced MM patients. Consecutive patients with AJCC (American Joint Committee on Ca ...[more]

PMID: 32751423

Similar Datasets

Project description:The toxicity spectrum between Chinese and Caucasian patients with melanoma who were treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) may differ. The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and tolerability of BRAFi and BRAFi-based combination therapies [MEK inhibitors (MEKi) or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody] in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We also investigated whether treatment-related adverse events (AEs) correlated with the prognosis. This retrospective study collected data from 43 patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive metastatic melanoma from a single Chinese cancer center. Of the 43 patients, 12 patients received BRAFi monotherapy, 12 patients received BRAFi+MEKi, and 19 patients received BRAFi combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody. The median follow-up time was 19 months. In the BRAFi group, the most common AEs were rashes, palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, and arthralgia. Four out of 12 (30%) patients experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs. All grades of AEs in the BRAFi+MEKi group were similar to the BRAFi group, except for higher pyrexia (58.3%) and fewer cutaneous AEs. Three out of 12 (25%) patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs, especially pyrexia (16.7%). In the BRAFi+anti-PD-1 antibody group, AEs were similar to the BRAFi group, except for an increased aminotransferase level (36.8%), increased bilirubin (31.6%), and hypothyroidism (15.8%). Eleven out of 19 (57.9%) patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs and four out of 19 (21%) patients discontinued the therapy due to AEs. Treatment-related hepatotoxicity (trHE), defined as an increase in either alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), or bilirubin levels, was the only AE identified as a significant poor-prognosis indicator in this study. The median progression-free survival of patients with trHE (41.9%) was 8 months, whereas it was 18 months for those without trHE [p = 0.046, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.116]. Moreover, this association was independent of medication regimens (p = 0.014, HR = 2.971). The overall response rate of patients with trHE was significantly lower than those without trHE (44.4 vs. 60.0%, p = 0.024), and we observed a similar trend in patients treated with BRAFi, BRAFi+MEKi, and BRAFi+anti-PD-1 antibody. In conclusion, BRAFi and BRAFi-based combination therapies were tolerable with reversible AEs in Chinese patients with melanoma. The trHE in patients receiving BRAFi and BRAFi-based regimens might indicate a poor therapy-related prognosis.

Project description:BRAF is a serine/threonine protein kinase activating the MAP kinase/ERK-signaling pathway. About 50 % of melanomas harbors activating BRAF mutations (over 90 % V600E). BRAFV600E has been implicated in different mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis, most of which due to the deregulated activation of the downstream MEK/ERK effectors. The first selective inhibitor of mutant BRAF, vemurafenib, after highly encouraging results of the phase I and II trial, was compared to dacarbazine in a phase III trial in treatment-naïve patients (BRIM-3). The study results showed a relative reduction of 63 % in risk of death and 74 % in risk of tumor progression. Considering all trials so far completed, median overall survival reached approximately 16 months for vemurafenib compared to less than 10 months for dacarbazine treatment. Vemurafenib has been extensively tested on melanoma patients expressing the BRAFV600E mutated form; it has been demonstrated to be also effective in inhibiting melanomas carrying the V600K mutation. In 2011, both FDA and EMA therefore approved vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma carrying BRAFV600 mutations. Some findings suggest that continuation of vemurafenib treatment is potentially beneficial after local therapy in a subset of patients with disease progression (PD). Among who continued vemurafenib >30 days after local therapy of PD lesion(s), a median overall survival was not reached, with a median follow-up of 15.5 months from initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy. For patients who did not continue treatment, median overall survival from the time of disease progression was 1.4 months. A clinical phase I/II trial is evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of vemurafenib in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor mAb ipilimumab. In the BRIM-7 trial vemurafenib is tested in association with GDC-0973, a potent and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1/2. Preliminary data seem to indicate that an additional inhibitor of mutated BRAF, GSK2118436, might be also active on a wider range of BRAF mutations (V600E-K-D-R); actually, treatment with such a compound is under evaluation in a phase III study among stage III-IV melanoma patients positive for BRAF mutations. Overall, BRAF inhibitors were well tolerated; common adverse events are arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea, with some variants between different inhibitors.

Project description:ImportanceThe optimal sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy for BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma is not well established.ObjectiveTo assess the association of BRAF wild-type (WT) or BRAF V600E/K-mutant status and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) with or without MEK inhibitor (MEKi) therapy with response to pembrolizumab.Design, setting, and participantsThis study is a post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from 3 multinational, multisite studies: KEYNOTE-001 (data cutoff September 1, 2017), KEYNOTE-002 (data cutoff May 30, 2018), and KEYNOTE-006 (data cutoff December 4, 2017). Patients included in this analysis were adults with advanced melanoma and known BRAF V600E/K tumor status who had received pembrolizumab.InterventionsPatients received pembrolizumab in dosages of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks.Main outcomes and measuresEnd points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival (OS). Objective response rates, 4-year PFS, and OS rates were compared in the following patient subgroups: BRAF WT vs BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma with vs without previous treatment with BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy.ResultsThe overall study population (N = 1558) included 944 men (60.6%) and 614 women (39.4%). The mean (SD) age was 60.0 years (14.0). The ORR was 38.3% (596/1558), 4-year PFS rate was 22.0%, and 4-year OS rate was 36.9%. For patients with BRAF WT (n = 1124) and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma (n = 434), ORR was 39.8% (n = 447) and 34.3% (n = 149), 4-year PFS rate was 22.9% and 19.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 37.5% and 35.1%, respectively. Patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who had (n = 271) vs had not (n = 163) previously received BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy had baseline characteristics with worse prognosis; ORR was 28.4% (n = 77) and 44.2% (n = 72), 4-year PFS rate was 15.2% and 27.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 26.9% and 49.3%, respectively.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this subgroup analysis support the use of pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced melanoma regardless of BRAF V600E/K mutation status or receipt of prior BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy.

Dataset Information

Comparison of BRAF Mutation Screening Strategies in a Large Real-Life Series of Advanced Melanoma Patients.

Publications

Comparison of <i>BRAF</i> Mutation Screening Strategies in a Large Real-Life Series of Advanced Melanoma Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets