Dataset Information

Outcomes of primary membranous nephropathy based on serum anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies and glomerular phospholipase A2 receptor antigen status: a retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is associated with the anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R) antibody in 70% of cases. Some anti-PLA2R-negative patients have the PLA2R antigen in renal tissue. This study examined the prognosis of patients with PMN according to their serum anti-PLA2R antibody (SAb) and glomerular PLA2R antigen (GAg) status.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PMN were included retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to their PLA2R status into the SAb-/GAg-, SAb-/GAg+, and SAb+/GAg + groups. Baseline data, renal biopsy results, treatment, and clinical data were compared among the groups. Cox univariable and multivariable analyses examined the factors related to complete remission (CR).

Results

A total of 114 patients were enrolled; 10 (9%) in the SAb-/GAg-, 23 (20%) in the SAb-/GAg+, and 81 (71%) in the SAb+/GAg+ groups. Cumulative CR rate showed a significant difference between the SAb-/GAg - and SAb+/GAg+ groups (log-rank p = 0.003). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that age (HR = 0.968; 95%CI = 0.946-0.990; p = 0.005), SAb+/GAg+ versus SAb-/GAg- (HR = 0.387; 95%CI = 0.190-0.788; p = 0.009), SAb-/GAg+ versus SAb-/GAg- (HR = 0.398; 95%CI = 0.169, 0.939; p = 0.035), total renal chronicity score ≥2 (HR = 0.461, 95%CI: 0.277-0.766, p = 0.003), and IgA deposition (HR = 2.596; 95%CI = 1.227-5.492; p = 0.013) were all independently related (p < 0.05) to CR.

Conclusions

The SAb and GAg status was an indicator of PMN prognosis. The patients with SAb-/GAg - had an increased likelihood of achieving CR than those with SAb-/GAg+ and SAb+/GAg+.

SUBMITTER: Yin P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7470143 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is recognized as a target antigen in primary membranous nephropathy (MN); Anti-?-enolase antibody in primary and secondary MN has been proposed, however, little is known about the potential contribution of ?-enolase to the pathogenesis of MN.We evaluated circulating antibodies to ?-enolase by a dot blotting system and PLA2R by indirect immunofluorescence, and glomerular deposition of these proteins in 25 patients with primary MN, 20 patients with secondary MN, 44 patients with collagen disease or severe infection, 60 patients with nephritis (each ten patients of IgA nephropathy, focal segmental gloemrulosclerosis, minimal change nephrotic syndrome, membranoproliferative glomeurlonephritis, diabetic glomerulosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial nephritis) as disease control, and 20 healthy subjects.In primary MN, 18 of 25 sera (72 %) showed anti-?-enolase antibody (IgG1 and IgG4, 11 pts; IgG4 alone, six pts; IgG1 alone, one pt). In secondary MN, 15 of 20 sera (75 %) contained anti-?-enolase antibody (IgG1 and IgG3, 13 pts; IgG3 alone, two pts). No circulating anti-?-enolase antibody was found in 44 collagen diseases or septic patients, 60 nephritis without MN, and 20 healthy subjects. Twelve of 25 sera (48 %) from patients with primary MN were positive for anti-PLA2R antibody, whereas all patients with secondary MN were negative. Eight of the 12 PLA2R-positive patients (67 %) with primary MN also had anti ?-enolase antibody. Although PLA2R antigen was present in a subepithelial pattern in 10 of 19 (52 %) patients with primary MN, ?-enolase was never detected in glomerular deposits in 19 and ten patients with primary and secondary MN, respectively.Circulating anti-?-enolase antibodies are highly present in both primary and secondary MN (about 70 %, respectively), while anti-PLA2R antibodies are specific for primary MN (48 %) with a prevalence apparently lower in the Japanese population than in Chinese and Caucasian populations. The absence of ?-enolase from subepithelial immune deposits suggests that anti-?-enolase antibodies do not contribute directly to immune-deposit formation, although they may have other pathogenic effects.