Dataset Information

Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS:This retrospective study was conducted in an interdisciplinary 22-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a German university hospital. Within an 18-month period, SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 were calculated for 514 critically ill patients that were admitted to the internal medicine department. To evaluate discrimination performance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for each score, exclusively or in combination with IL-6 or PCT or CRP. DeLong test was used to compare different AUROCs. RESULTS:The SAPS 2 exhibited a better discrimination performance than SAPS 3 with AUROCs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), respectively. Overall, combination of the SAPS 2 with IL-6 showed the best discrimination performance (AUROC 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.87), albeit not significantly different from SAPS2. IL-6 performed better than PCT and CRP with AUROCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69-0.81), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.72), respectively. Performance of the SAPS 3 improved significantly when combined with IL-6 (AUROC 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81) or PCT (AUROC 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78). CONCLUSIONS:Our analysis provided evidence that the risk stratification performance of the SAPS 3 and, to a lesser degree, also of the SAPS 2 can increase when combined with IL-6. A more accurate detection of aberrant or dysregulated systemic immunological responses (by IL-6) may explain the higher performance achieved by SAPS 3 + IL-6 vs. SAPS 3. Thus, implementation of IL-6 in critical care scores can improve prediction outcomes, especially in patients experiencing acute inflammatory conditions; however, statistical results may vary across hospital types and/or patient populations with different case mix.

SUBMITTER: Jahn M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7470390 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP.

Jahn Michael M Rekowski Jan J Jánosi Rolf Alexander RA Kribben Andreas A Canbay Ali A Katsounas Antonios A

PloS one 20200903 9

<h4>Objective</h4>We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality.<h4>Material and methods</h4>This retrospective study was conducted in an interdisciplinary 22-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a German university hospital. Within an 18-month period, SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 were calculated for 514 critically ill pati ...[more]

PMID: 32881963

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn the diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI), various inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukins (IL), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil percentage (NE%), platelet count (PLT), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) have been extensively utilized. However, their specific roles in distinguishing BSI from local bacterial infection (LBI) and in classifying BSI pathogens remain uncertain.MethodsA historical cohort study was conducted, involving the enrollment of 505 patients with BSI and 102 patients with LBI. To validate the reliability of the clinical data obtained from this cohort, mouse models of BSI were utilized.ResultsOur findings revealed that patients with BSI had significantly higher levels of inflammatory markers, including CRP, PCT, IL-6, IL-10, WBC, NE%, and ESR, compared to those with LBI (p < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that CRP, PCT, IL-6, IL-10, ESR and NE% exhibited excellent diagnostic efficacy for BSI. Additionally, we observed significant differences in CRP, PCT, IL-6, and IL-10 levels between patients with BSI caused by Gram-positive bacteria (GP-BSI) and Gram-negative bacteria (GN-BSI), but no significant variations were found among specific bacterial species. Furthermore, our study also found that CRP, PCT, and IL-10 have good discriminatory ability for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), but they show no significant diagnostic efficacy for other multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In our mouse model experiments, we observed a remarkable increase in PCT, IL-6, and IL-10 levels in mice with GN-BSI compared to those with GP-BSI.ConclusionOur study has confirmed that PCT, IL-6, and IL-10 are efficient biomarkers for distinguishing between BSI and LBI. Furthermore, they can be utilized to classify BSI pathogens and differentiate between VRE and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus. These findings are extremely valuable for clinicians as they enable timely initiation of empiric antibiotic therapies and ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for patients with BSI.

Dataset Information

Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP.

Publications

Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets