Dataset Information

A prospective cohort study of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major: Dynamics of the Leishmanin skin test and its predictive value for protection against infection and disease.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Leishmanin Skin Test (LST) is considered as a useful indicator of past infection by Leishmania parasites. However, the temporal dynamics of a positive LST under different epidemiologic scenarios and whether it relates to the protection against the recurrence of an overt disease are not fully documented. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We report here on a population based prospective study conducted on 2686 individuals living in two foci located in Central Tunisia, to assess over a one-year epidemiologic season, the incidence of Leishmania (L.) major infection and disease and changes in LST reactivity. The two foci were both endemic for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) due to L. major, but contrasted in their history for this disease (ie: an old focus versus a recent focus). We found that most infections occurred in the new focus (290/1000; 95% CI: 265-315 person-years) with an incidence rate of CL lesions 2.4 times higher than in the old focus. Likewise, the rates of LST reactivity reversion and loss, in the new focus, were 99/1000[38-116] person-years and 14/1000[8-21] person-years, respectively. Loss of LST reactivity was not noticed in the old focus. Interestingly, the incidence rates of symptomatic infection did not differ significantly according to the LST status at enrolment (negative versus positive) between the combined foci and the new one. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:Our findings confirm LST as a good tool for assessing L. major cryptic infection. However, the instability of the LST positivity in new foci should be considered as an important confounder of the outcome of this infection when developing a research protocol for vaccine trial.

SUBMITTER: Bettaieb J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7473511 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A prospective cohort study of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major: Dynamics of the Leishmanin skin test and its predictive value for protection against infection and disease.

Bettaieb Jihène J Toumi Amine A Ghawar Wissem W Chlif Sadok S Nouira Mariem M Belhaj-Hamida Nabil N Gharbi Adel A Ben-Alaya Nissaf N Laouini Dhafer D Louzir Hechmi H Dellagi Koussay K Ben Salah Afif A

PLoS neglected tropical diseases 20200825 8

<h4>Background</h4>Leishmanin Skin Test (LST) is considered as a useful indicator of past infection by Leishmania parasites. However, the temporal dynamics of a positive LST under different epidemiologic scenarios and whether it relates to the protection against the recurrence of an overt disease are not fully documented.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We report here on a population based prospective study conducted on 2686 individuals living in two foci located in Central Tunisia, to ass ...[more]

PMID: 32841284

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRecent circumstantial evidence suggests that an increasing number of Iranian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis are unresponsive to meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime), the first line of treatment in Iran. This study was designed to determine whether the clinical responses (healing, or non-healing) were correlated with the susceptibility of Leishmania parasites to Glucantime.Methods and findingsIn vitro susceptibility testing was first performed on 185 isolated parasites in the intracellular mouse peritoneal macrophage model. A strong correlation between the clinical outcome and the in vitro effective concentration 50% (EC50) values was observed. Parasites derived from patients with non-healing lesions had EC50 values at least 4-fold higher than parasites derived from lesions of healing patients. A selection of these strains was typed at the molecular level by pulsed-field gels and by sequencing the pteridine reductase 1 (PTR1) gene. These techniques indicated that 28 out of 31 selected strains were Leishmania tropica and that three were Leishmania major. The L. major isolates were part of a distinct pulsed-field group, and the L. tropica isolates could be classified in three related additional pulsed-field groups. For each pulsed-field karyotype, we selected sensitive and resistant parasites in which we transfected the firefly luciferase marker to assess further the in vitro susceptibility of field isolates in the monocyte cell line THP1. These determinations confirmed unequivocally that patients with non-healing lesions were infected with L. tropica parasites resistant to Glucantime. Additional characterization of the resistant isolates showed that resistance is stable and can be reversed by buthionine sulfoximine, an inhibitor of glutathione biosynthesis.ConclusionsTo the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of proven resistant parasites contributing to treatment failure for cutaneous leishmaniasis and shows that primary Glucantime-resistant L. tropica field isolates are now frequent in Iran.

Project description:BackgroundLeishmania aethiopica is a unique species that causes cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), and studies evaluating treatment outcomes for this condition reported inconsistent findings. This study aimed to summarize the evidence on treatment outcomes of CL caused by L. aethiopica to support decisions or propose further study.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. In addition, we searched grey literature on Google Scholar and performed manual searching on the reference list of articles. Two authors did the screening, selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction. With the narrative synthesis of evidence, we performed a random effects model meta-analysis using the metaprop package in Stata 17. We did sensitivity and subgroup analyses after assessing heterogeneity using the I-squared test and forest plots. The funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias.ResultsThe review included 22 studies with 808 participants, and the meta-analysis included seven studies with 677 participants. Most studies documented treatment outcomes with antimonial monotherapy, and only one study reported outcomes with combination therapy. The overall pooled proportion of cure was 63% (95% CI: 38-86%). In the subgroup analysis, systemic antimonial monotherapy showed a cure rate of 61%, and the proportion of cure was 87% with topical therapy. Topical therapy showed a better cure for the localized clinical phenotype. A cohort study documented a cure rate of 94.8% with combination therapy for the localized, mucocutaneous, and diffuse clinical phenotypes. The pooled proportion of unfavourable outcomes was partial response (19%), relapse (17%), discontinuation (19%), and unresponsiveness (6%).ConclusionsThe pooled proportion of cure is low with antimonial monotherapy. Despite limited evidence, combination therapies are a promising treatment option for all clinical phenotypes of CL caused by L. aethiopica. Future high-quality randomized control trials are needed to identify effective monotherapies and evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapies.

Project description:BackgroundDrug resistance is a common phenomenon frequently observed in countries where leishmaniasis is endemic. Due to the production of the pteridine reductase enzyme (PTR1), drugs lose their efficacy, and consequently, the patient becomes unresponsive to treatment. This study aimed to compare the in vitro effect of meglumine antimoniate (MA) on non- healing Leishmania tropica isolates and on MA transfected non-healing one to PTR1.MethodsTwo non-healing and one healing isolates of L. tropica were collected from patients who received two courses or one cycle of intralesional MA along with biweekly liquid nitrogen cryotherapy or systemic treatment alone, respectively. After confirmation of L. tropica isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the recombinant plasmid pcDNA-rPTR (antisense) was transfected via electroporation and cultured on M199. Isolates in form of promastigotes were treated with different concentrations of MA and read using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader and the half inhibitory concentration (IC50 ) value was calculated. The amastigotes were grown in mouse macrophages and were similarly treated with various concentrations of MA. The culture glass slides were stained, and the mean number of intramacrophage amastigotes and infected macrophages were assessed in triplicate for both stages.ResultsAll three transfected isolates displayed a reduction in optical density compared with the promastigotes in respective isolates, although there was no significant difference between non-healing and healing isolates. In contrast, in the clinical form (amastigotes), there was a significant difference between non-healing and healing isolates (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe results indicated that the PTR1 gene reduced the efficacy of the drug, and its inhibition by antisense and could improve the treatment of non-healing cases. These findings have future implications in the prophylactic and therapeutic modality of non- healing Leishmania isolates to drug.

Dataset Information

A prospective cohort study of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major: Dynamics of the Leishmanin skin test and its predictive value for protection against infection and disease.

Publications

A prospective cohort study of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major: Dynamics of the Leishmanin skin test and its predictive value for protection against infection and disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets