Dataset Information

Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis: Is It Worth?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Osteoarthritis of knee is one of the important causes of knee pain in elderly patients and is a debilitating disease. It often leads to varus deformity of knee. Many treatment options are available for this progressive knee joint disorder. Proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) is a novel yet simple procedure used to alleviate the symptoms of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether this procedure improves the symptoms, functions and limb alignment in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, this prospective study included 42 cases (56 knees) with Kellgren-Lawrence grade II and III medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and underwent proximal fibular osteotomy. Clinical assessment was done by visual analogue scale (VAS) score and The Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up for pain and functional improvement. Radiological assessment was done by measuring femoro-tibial angles (FTA) pre-operatively and at 1 year follow-up.

Results

The mean age was 58.30 years. There were 30 females and 12 males. The preoperative mean WOMAC score was 87.3, at 3 months follow-up it was 29.4 this was significantly better (p < 0.05) but the improvement was not significant at subsequent follow-up visits. Similarly the VAS scores also showed significant improvement at 3 months, but not at 6 and 12 months follow-up. There was no significant improvement in the femoro-tibial angle (FTA) at 1 year follow-up.

Conclusion

The study highlights that both the VAS scores and WOMAC scores were significantly better at 3 months after surgery. However these did not show any significant improvement at 6 and 12 months. It does not change the alignment of knee at one year follow-up. The authors conclude that proximal fibular osteotomy provides only short-term relief in patients of medial compartment knee osteo-arthritis.

SUBMITTER: Huda N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7474049 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Interest in bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) for the treatment of medial patellofemoral osteoarthritis (MPFOA) has grown in recent years because BKA offers a bone and ligament-preserving alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BKA only resurfaces the diseased compartments, while preserving proprioception and native knee kinematics. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess knee function, perioperative morbidity, and implant survivability in patients undergoing BKA vs TKA for MPFOA. Methods:The databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, and EMBASE were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies comparing BKA with TKA for the treatment of MPFOA were included for further analysis. The primary outcome of interest was knee function. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, operation length, intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and rate of revision length. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling the results of the selected studies when possible. Results:Six studies were selected for inclusion (4 prospective studies and 2 retrospective cohort studies). In total, 274 patients and 277 knees were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at any time points in terms of knee function, length of stay, complication rate, or revision rate, when monolithic BKA designs were controlled for. BKA did result in significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss, at the expense of increased operative length compared with TKA. Conclusions:The use of modular BKA for MPFOA is comparable with TKA in terms of short-term function, complication rate, and revision rate. BKA reduces intraoperative blood losses, but it is also more technically demanding, resulting in increased operation length. The use of modular BKA has acceptable short-term outcomes, but more long-term data are needed before it can be recommended for routine use in the treatment of MPFOA. The selection of modular BKA should be determined on a patient-specific basis. Currently, there is no evidence to suggest the use of monolithic BKA designs because of their high revision and failure rate.

Project description:CONTEXT::Knee osteoarthritis affects 9.3 million adults over age 45 years in the United States. There is significant disability associated with this condition. Given the potential complications and the significant cost to the health care system with the dramatic increase in total knee arthroplasties performed for this condition, assessment of the efficacy of nonoperative modalities, such as offloading knee braces, is essential as part of optimizing nonoperative treatment for this condition. OBJECTIVE::To determine the effectiveness of valgus offloader braces in improving clinical outcomes for patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. DATA SOURCES::Three databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) were searched from database inception through July 28, 2017. STUDY SELECTION::Studies reporting outcomes of valgus offloader knee braces in the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were included. STUDY DESIGN::Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION::Data pertaining to demographics, descriptive statistics, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the included studies. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated. RESULTS::A total of 31 studies were included, with a total of 619 patients. The majority of studies reported improved pain outcomes using valgus offloader braces. However, variable results were reported as to whether valgus offloader braces significantly improved functional outcomes and stiffness. Offloader bracing was more effective at reducing pain when compared with neutral braces or neoprene sleeves. CONCLUSION::Valgus offloader bracing is an effective treatment for improving pain secondary to medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. The literature remains unclear on the effectiveness of valgus offloader braces with regard to functional outcomes and stiffness. Larger prospective randomized trials with consistent outcome assessment tools and consideration of patient compliance would be beneficial to more accurately determine treatment effects of valgus offloader bracing.