Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Concurrent cisplatin with radiotherapy (CRT) or concurrent cetuximab with radiotherapy (BRT) improves outcomes in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) compared with radiotherapy alone. Nevertheless, a detailed comparison between CRT and BRT in locally advanced HNSCC is required due to inconclusive results. METHODS:A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and EMBASE. Studies that evaluated CRT vs BRT in locally advanced HNSCC were included. The primary outcome that was overall survival (OS), whereas the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate prognosis. All the analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software 12.0. RESULTS:Twenty-three studies, with a total of 8701 patients, were considered eligible and included in this meta-analysis. Our results revealed that patients treated with CRT had longer OS (HR?=?0.51, 95%CI, 0.41-0.64, P?

SUBMITTER: Tang WH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7478598 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Tang Wen-Hua WH   Sun Wei W   Long Guo-Xian GX  

Medicine 20200901 36


<h4>Background</h4>Concurrent cisplatin with radiotherapy (CRT) or concurrent cetuximab with radiotherapy (BRT) improves outcomes in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) compared with radiotherapy alone. Nevertheless, a detailed comparison between CRT and BRT in locally advanced HNSCC is required due to inconclusive results.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and EMBASE. Studies that evaluated CR  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3018361 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6199702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4978947 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4283547 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6886128 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6536039 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4844765 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2640438 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3832987 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5546524 | biostudies-other