Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and minimally invasive PCNL are currently therapeutic options for lower-pole renal stones (LPS). However, the optimal treatment for LPS remains unclear. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of each intervention is needed to inform clinical decision-making. This study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of different interventions for LPS.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 6th 2018. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including the patients treated for LPS were included. The frequentist models of network meta-analysis were used to compare the effect sizes. The primary outcome was stone free rate, and the secondary outcomes were overall complication rate, major complication rate, retreatment rate, and auxiliary procedure rate.

Results

This study included 13 RCTs comprising 1832 participants undergoing 6 different interventions, including RIRS, PCNL, Mini-PCNL, Micro-PCNL, SWL, and conservative observation. PCNL had the best stone free rate (odds ratio [OR]?=?3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.30-9.12), followed by Mini-PCNL (OR?=?2.90, 95% CI?=?1.13-7.46). Meta-regression did not find any association of the treatment effect with age, sex, and stone size. Although PCNL tended to exhibit a higher complication rate, the difference of complication rate among various interventions did not achieve a statistical significance. SWL was the less effective and associated with higher retreatment rate compared with PCNL, Mini-PNCL, and RIRS.

Conclusions

PCNL was associated with the best stone free rate for LPS regardless of age, sex, and stone size. Each treatment achieved a similar complication rate compared with the others. Future large-scale RCTs are warranted to identify the most beneficial management for renal stones at a more complicated location.

SUBMITTER: Tsai SH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7478758 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Tsai Sheng-Han SH   Chung Hsiao-Jen HJ   Tseng Ping-Tao PT   Wu Yi-Cheng YC   Tu Yu-Kang YK   Hsu Chih-Wei CW   Lei Wei-Te WT  

Medicine 20200301 10


<h4>Background</h4>Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and minimally invasive PCNL are currently therapeutic options for lower-pole renal stones (LPS). However, the optimal treatment for LPS remains unclear. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of each intervention is needed to inform clinical decision-making. This study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of different interventions for LPS.<h4>Methods</  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7823824 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6383992 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5300230 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8950564 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10598962 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6195289 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7220875 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5671844 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10188567 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9422349 | biostudies-literature