Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Effects of clinical practice changes on ICU delirium are not well understood.Objectives
Determine ICU delirium rates over time.Methods
Data from a previously described screening cohort of the Pharmacological Management of Delirium trial was analyzed. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) were assessed twice daily. We defined: Any delirium (positive CAM-ICU at any time during ICU stay) and ICU-acquired delirium (1st CAM-ICU negative with a subsequent positive CAM-ICU). Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to test for differences.Results
2742 patient admissions were included. Delirium occurred in 16.5%, any delirium decreased [22.7% to 10.2% (p < 0.01)], and ICU-acquired delirium decreased [8.4% to 4.4% (p = 0.01)]. Coma decreased from 24% to 17.4% (p = 0.04). Later ICU years and higher mean RASS scores were associated with lower odds of delirium.Conclusions
Delirium rates were not explained by the measured variables and further prospective research is needed.
SUBMITTER: Khan SH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7483280 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep - Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Khan Sikandar H SH Lindroth Heidi H Hendrie Kyle K Wang Sophia S Imran Sundus S Perkins Anthony J AJ Gao Sujuan S Vahidy Farhaan S FS Boustani Malaz M Khan Babar A BA
Heart & lung : the journal of critical care 20200325 5
<h4>Background</h4>Effects of clinical practice changes on ICU delirium are not well understood.<h4>Objectives</h4>Determine ICU delirium rates over time.<h4>Methods</h4>Data from a previously described screening cohort of the Pharmacological Management of Delirium trial was analyzed. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) were assessed twice daily. We defined: Any delirium (positive CAM-ICU at any time during ICU stay) and ICU-acquired del ...[more]