Dataset Information

Deep-Learning Detection of Cancer Metastases to the Brain on MRI.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Approximately one-fourth of all cancer metastases are found in the brain. MRI is the primary technique for detection of brain metastasis, planning of radiotherapy, and the monitoring of treatment response. Progress in tumor treatment now requires detection of new or growing metastases at the small subcentimeter size, when these therapies are most effective.

Purpose

To develop a deep-learning-based approach for finding brain metastasis on MRI.

Study type

Retrospective.

Sequence

Axial postcontrast 3D T₁ -weighted imaging.

Field strength

1.5T and 3T.

Population

A total of 361 scans of 121 patients were used to train and test the Faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN): 1565 lesions in 270 scans of 73 patients for training; 488 lesions in 91 scans of 48 patients for testing. From the 48 outputs of Faster R-CNN, 212 lesions in 46 scans of 18 patients were used for training the RUSBoost algorithm (MatLab) and 276 lesions in 45 scans of 30 patients for testing.

Assessment

Two radiologists diagnosed and supervised annotation of metastases on brain MRI as ground truth. This data were used to produce a 2-step pipeline consisting of a Faster R-CNN for detecting abnormal hyperintensity that may represent brain metastasis and a RUSBoost classifier to reduce the number of false-positive foci detected.

Statistical tests

The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by using sensitivity, false-positive rate, and receiver's operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The detection performance was assessed both per-metastases and per-slice.

Results

Testing on held-out brain MRI data demonstrated 96% sensitivity and 20 false-positive metastases per scan. The results showed an 87.1% sensitivity and 0.24 false-positive metastases per slice. The area under the ROC curve was 0.79.

Conclusion

Our results showed that deep-learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) had the potential of detecting brain metastases with high sensitivity and reasonable specificity.

Level of evidence

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1227-1236.

SUBMITTER: Zhang M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7487020 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 ± 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 ± 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 ± 0.104 vs. 0.774 ± 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 ± 0.225 vs. 0.492 ± 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm3 lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences.