Dataset Information

Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty to Correct Leg Length Discrepancy in a Patient With Spinopelvic Obliquity.

ABSTRACT: Leg length discrepancy is not an uncommon result of total hip arthroplasty and a major cause of patient dissatisfaction. Spinopelvic obliquity is a less-recognized cause of limb length differences in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The robotic arm has recently been introduced to enhance implant positioning during surgery and to achieve more predictable leg length and offset goals. In this article, we illustrate the case of a patient who presented with a leg length discrepancy associated with significant spinopelvic obliquity. We show the use of the robotic arm total hip application to improve her pelvic obliquity and limb length discrepancy. This approach helped with the patient's symptoms and gait as well as her radiographic pelvic alignment.

SUBMITTER: Taha TA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7487319 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty to Correct Leg Length Discrepancy in a Patient With Spinopelvic Obliquity.

Taha Tarek A TA Bejcek Christopher C

Arthroplasty today 20200908 4

Leg length discrepancy is not an uncommon result of total hip arthroplasty and a major cause of patient dissatisfaction. Spinopelvic obliquity is a less-recognized cause of limb length differences in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The robotic arm has recently been introduced to enhance implant positioning during surgery and to achieve more predictable leg length and offset goals. In this article, we illustrate the case of a patient who presented with a leg length discrepancy associa ...[more]

PMID: 32964087

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLeg-length discrepancy (LLD) after primary THA is not uncommon. Little is known, however, about the role of hip-sparing procedures for equalization of LLD after THA.Questions/purposesThe aim of this study is to report our experiences with these techniques in patients presenting at one institution over a 10-year period.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed records at one institution to find patients who had sought surgical treatment for LLD after THA between January 2007 and August 2017. Patients who had LLD related to conditions other than the THA, such as bone loss or traumatic defects, were excluded. We recorded the time after THA, laterality, and LLD. Assessment of LLD was performed using clinical and radiographic examinations. Patient demographics and true LLD were recorded, as were prior conservative treatment, equalization procedure performed, final leg length after equalization surgery, time to healing, and complications.ResultsAfter exclusion of patients with LLD related to other causes, eight patients in whom conservative treatment had failed and who had undergone hip-sparing leg-length equalization surgery were included in the study. The average age was 44.6 years (range, 18 to 66 years). Seven of the patients were female. The pre-operative mean LLD was 3.1 cm (range 1.5 to 7 cm). In those who were long after THA, ipsilateral (THA-side) shortening of femur with a retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN; n = 1) or with a plate (n = 1) was performed. In those who were short after THA, ipsilateral femur lengthening with retrograde Precice nails (n = 2), ipsilateral tibial lengthening with Precice nails (n = 2), or contralateral femur shortening with a retrograde IMN (n = 2) was performed. The average time to full consolidation or union was 6.6 months (range, 2 to 19 months). Two patients had delayed union. All patients but one were satisfied with final results.ConclusionWe believe that hip-sparing equalization procedures can be part of the treatment algorithm of LLD after THA. These advancements in the field are promising and might expand the indications of lengthening and equalization procedures to include LLD after THA.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Robotic-arm assisted surgery aims to reduce manual errors and improve the accuracy of implant positioning during total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of implant positioning, restoration of hip biomechanics, patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, implant survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and complications in conventional manual total hip arthroplasty (CO THA) versus robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (RO THA). Preoperative pelvic computerised tomography (CT) scans will be used to create patient-specific, virtual, three-dimensional reconstructions for surgical planning in both treatment groups. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:This prospective randomised controlled trial will include 60 patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis undergoing primary THA. Following informed consent, patients will be randomised to CO THA (control group) or RO THA (investigation group) at a ratio of 1:1 using an online random number generator. Observers will review patients at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery to record predefined study outcomes relating to the accuracy of implant positioning, hip biomechanics, postoperative rehabilitation, clinical progress, functional outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and complications. Primary and secondary objectives will be used to quantify and draw inferences on differences in the efficacy of treatment between the two groups. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol population analysis will be undertaken. Intention to treat relates to the allocated treatment (CO THA or RO THA), and per-protocol refers to the actual treatment received by the patient. The following statistical methods will be employed to analyse the data: descriptive statistics, independent t test, paired t test, analysis of variance, Fisher exact test, chi-square test, and graphical displays. Ethical approval was obtained from the London-Bromley Research Ethics Committee, UK. The study is sponsored by University College London, UK. DISCUSSION:This study compares a comprehensive and robust range of clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in CT-planned CO THA versus CT-planned RO THA. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of the differences in CO THA versus RO THA with respect to patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, implant survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04095845 . Registered on 19 September 2019.

Dataset Information

Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty to Correct Leg Length Discrepancy in a Patient With Spinopelvic Obliquity.

Publications

Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty to Correct Leg Length Discrepancy in a Patient With Spinopelvic Obliquity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure