Dataset Information

Can polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 affect ovarian stimulation outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Previous studies have investigated the effects of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and AMH type II receptor (AMHR2) polymorphisms on ovarian stimulation outcomes, but the results were inconsistent.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for the literature used in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model with RevMan 5.3.5. Results were expressed as the relative risk (RR) for discrete data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Seven studies with 2078 participants were included. More metaphase II (MII) oocytes were retrieved in the T allele carrier of AMH (rs10407022) in the dominant model (MD: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.65, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001), homozygote model (MD: 1.68, 95% CI: 0.35 to 3.01, I² = 70%, P = 0.01) and heterogeneity model (MD: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.66, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001). Oocytes retrieved from the Asian region in the TT carrier were significantly lesser than those in the GG/GT carrier in AMH (rs10407022) (MD: -1.41, 95% CI: - 1.75 to - 1.07, I² = 0%). Differences in the stimulation duration, gonadotropin (Gn) dosage, and pregnancy rate were insignificant.

Conclusions

Our analysis indicated that the polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 could influence the ovarian stimulation outcomes. Prospective studies with a larger sample size and more rigorous design are needed in the future to further confirm these findings.

SUBMITTER: Chen D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7487641 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Can polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 affect ovarian stimulation outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen Di D Zhu Xiangyu X Wu Jielei J

Journal of ovarian research 20200904 1

<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies have investigated the effects of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and AMH type II receptor (AMHR2) polymorphisms on ovarian stimulation outcomes, but the results were inconsistent.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for the literature used in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model with RevMan 5.3.5. Results were expressed as the relative ri ...[more]

PMID: 32887648

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveAlthough several studies have reported a potential impact of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms on controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), the results remain controversial. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of MTHFR polymorphism on COS outcomes.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched up to December 2, 2020. COS clinical outcomes based on gene polymorphisms were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes were the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes, stimulation duration, basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level, FSH dosage, positive pregnancy test, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model or random-effect model with Review Man 5.3.5. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) was calculated for continuous outcomes. The quality assessment of included studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsEleven studies were included in the systematic review, and seven studies with 2015 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Basal FSH level was significantly lower in CC homozygotes than TT homozygotes (four studies, 867 participants, MD - 0.54, 95%CI - 0.85 to - 0.23, P = 0.0006; I2 = 0%) of MTHFR (rs1801133). FSH dose was significantly fewer in CC homozygotes compared with CT heterogeneous (three studies, 949 participants, MD - 75.78, 95%CI - 135.23 to - 16.33, P = 0.01; I2 = 32%) or CT/TT model (three studies, 1097 participants, MD - 80.18, 95%CI - 135.54 to - 24.81, P = 0.005; I2 = 42%). Differences in the oocytes retrieved and stimulation duration were insignificant. Gene variants on MTHFR (rs1801133) and MTHFR (rs1801131) were reported in ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate.ConclusionStudies to date indicate that polymorphisms of MTHFR could influence basal FSH level and FSH dose. The results could be useful to promote clinical practice on COS protocols. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the multigene combination on COS.

Project description:BackgroundPublished data on the relationship between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk have implicated inconclusive results. To evaluate the role of MMPs polymorphisms in ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis and systematic review were performed.MethodsMMPs polymorphisms which could be quantitatively synthesized were involved in meta-analysis. Five comparison models (homozygote model, heterozygote model, dominant model, recessive model, additive model) were carried out, a subgroup analysis was performed to clarify heterogeneity source. The remaining polymorphisms which could not be quantitatively synthesized were involved in systematic review.Results10 articles with 20 studies were included in this paper. Among those studies, 8 studies involving MMP1 rs1799750 and MMP3 rs34093618 could be meta-analyzed and 12 studies involving 12 polymorphisms could not. Meta-analysis showed that no associations were found between MMP1 rs1799750 (homozygote model: OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.70-1.23, POR = 0.60; heterozygote model: OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.78-1.54, POR = 0.61; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.83-1.25, POR = 0.84; recessive model: OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.75-1.21, POR = 0.67; additive model: OR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.85-1.17, POR = 0.99), MMP3 rs34093618 (homozygote model: OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.70-2.24, POR = 0.46; heterozygote model: OR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.51-2.31, POR = 0.84; dominant model: OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.68-1.38, POR = 0.85; recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.69-1.80, POR = 0.65; additive model: OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.79-1.31, POR = 0.91) and ovarian cancer. Furthermore, similar results were detected in subgroup analysis. The systematic review on 12 polymorphisms suggested that MMP2 C-735T, MMP7 A-181G, MMP8 rs11225395, MMP9 rs6094237, MMP12 rs2276109, MMP20 rs2292730, MMP20 rs12278250, MMP20 rs9787933 might have a potential effect on ovarian cancer risk.ConclusionsIn summary, polymorphisms of MMPs might not be associated with ovarian cancer risk. However, it is necessary to conduct more larger-scale, multicenter, and high-quality studies in the future.

Dataset Information

Can polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 affect ovarian stimulation outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Can polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 affect ovarian stimulation outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets