Local Surgery Improves Survival in Patients with Primary Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhao YY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7490663 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPrimary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is a rare genitourinary malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of surgery on survival of patients diagnosed with PUC.MethodsA total of 1544 PUC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified based on the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and the Fine and Gray competing risks analysis were performed to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The multivariate Cox regression model and competing risks regression model were used to identify independent risk factors of OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS).ResultsThe 5-yr OS was significantly better in patients who received either local therapy (39.8%) or radical surgery (44.7%) compared to patients receiving no surgery of the primary site (21.5%) (p < 0.001). Both local therapy and radical surgery were each independently associated with decreased CSM, with predicted 5-yr cumulative incidence of 45.4 and 43.3%, respectively, compared to 64.7% for patients receiving no surgery of the primary site (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that primary site surgery was independently associated with better OS (local therapy, p = 0.037; radical surgery, p < 0.001) and decreased CSM (p = 0.003). Similar results were noted regardless of age, sex, T stage, N stage, and AJCC prognostic groups based on subgroup analysis. However, patients with M1 disease who underwent primary site surgery did not exhibit any survival benefit.ConclusionSurgery for the primary tumor conferred a survival advantage in non-metastatic PUC patients.
| S-EPMC8314574 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about the role of local therapy in elderly patients with stage IV breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of local therapy including surgery and radiotherapy in this kind of population by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsEligible patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were selected from the SEER database. Baseline characteristics, way of local therapy and survival information were collected for survival and analysis of prognostic factors. Cause-specific survival (CSS) curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox regression and multivariate competing risk analyses were used to analyze prognosis factors.ResultsA total of 1,900 patients were enrolled with the median age of 71 (range, 65 to 95) years. The 5-year CSS of patients with surgery was significantly better than that of those who did not (36.5% vs. 22.4%, P<0.001). Moreover, surgery was an independent protective factor for CSS in both multivariate Cox regression analysis [hazard ratio (HR), 0.588; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.485-0.643; P<0.001] and multivariate competing risk analysis [subdistribution HR (SHR), 0.620; 95% CI, 0.535-0.718; P<0.001]. Stratified analysis showed that most subgroup patients could benefit from surgery. The 5-year CSS of patients with radiotherapy was comparable to those without radiotherapy (28.9% vs. 26.5%, P=0.060), and radiotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor for CSS (SHR, 1.005; 95% CI, 0.846-1.202; P=0.954). However, subgroup analysis found that patients with moderate grade in histopathology, luminal A, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype could benefit from radiotherapy (all P<0.05).ConclusionsElderly patients with stage IV breast cancer can benefit from surgical treatment. This study helps to select the appropriate group for local surgery or radiotherapy according to the personal situation of the elderly to obtain the maximum benefit.
| S-EPMC9816855 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Surgery has been the primary treatment in patients with localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) for many decades, whereas it remains controversial regarding the efficacy of primary tumor resection for metastatic GISTs treated with chemotherapy, and likewise it is unclear who would benefit from the surgical resection. Methods: GISTs patients with distant metastases were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of surgery on survival. Results: In total, of 455 patients with metastatic GISTs, 235 patients (51.6%) underwent primary tumor resection and 220 patients (48.4%) did not. Median survival of patients in resection group was 72 (95% CI: 62.90-81.10) months vs. 40 (95% CI: 29.53-50.47) months for those in non-resection group (p < 0.001). Similarly, surgery in conjunction with chemotherapy led to a favorable impact on survival than chemotherapy alone (OS: 72 vs. 40 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 74 vs. 44 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that both OS (HR: 0.581, 95% CI: 0.386-0.874, p = 0.009) and CSS (HR: 0.663, 95% CI: 0.439-0.912, p = 0.042] were dramatically improved in patients with surgical removal of primary site, as well as primary tumor size between 5 and 10 cm, while increasing age was predictive of poorer survival. Stratified analysis revealed that patients with tumor locations in the stomach demonstrated a prolonged survival after surgery, with no significant differential surgical effect between the stomach and small intestine. Conclusions: Our study preliminarily suggests that carefully selected patients with metastatic GISTs might prolong survival after treatment of surgery, especially those with a primary tumor between 5 and 10 cm and a tumor located in the stomach.
| S-EPMC7466430 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Distant metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma reduces the survival rate. we aim to develop a nomogram in order to predict the survival of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsWe retrospectively collected patients who were initially diagnosed as metastatic LUAD from 2010 to 2015 from SEER database. Based on the multivariate and univariate Cox regression analysis of the training cohorts, independent prognostic factors were assessed. The nomogram prediction model was then constructed based on these prognostic factors to predict the overall survival at 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery. Nomogram were identified and calibrated by c-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC) and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to quantify the net benefit of the nomogram at different threshold probabilities, and to better compare with the TNM staging system, we calculated the c-index of this nomogram as well as the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).ResultA total of 1102 patients with metastatic LUAD who met the requirements were included for analysis. They were randomly divided into 774 in the training cohorts and 328 in the validation cohorts. As can be seen from the calibration plots, the predicted nomogram and the actual observations in both of the training and validation cohorts were generally consistent. The time dependent AUC values of 12 months, 24 months and 36 months were 0.707, 0.674 and 0.686 in the training cohorts and 0.690, 0.680 and 0.688 in the verification cohorts, respectively. C-indexes for the training and validation cohorts were 0.653 (95%CI 0.626-0.68)and 0.663 (95%CI 0.626-1), respectively. NRI and IDI show that the model is more clinical applicable than the existing staging system. In addition, our risk scoring system based on Kaplan Meier (K-M) survival curve can accurately divide patients into three hierarchy risk groups.ConclusionThis has led to the development and validation of a prognostic nomogram to assist clinicians in determining the prognosis of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma after primary site surgery.
| S-EPMC9413074 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe aim of this study was to establish individualized nomograms to predict survival outcomes in older female patients with stage IV breast cancer who did or did not undergo local surgery, and to determine which patients could benefit from surgery.MethodsA total of 3,129 female patients with stage IV breast cancer aged ≥70 years between 2010 and 2015 were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. Nomograms and risk stratification models were constructed.ResultsPatients who underwent surgery had better OS (HR = 0.751, 95% CI [0.668-0.843], P < 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.713, 95% CI [0.627-0.810], P < 0.001) than patients who did not undergo surgery. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, lung or liver metastases may not benefit from surgery. In the stratification model, low-risk patients benefited from surgery (OS, HR = 0.688, 95% CI [0.568-0.833], P < 0.001; BCSS, HR = 0.632, 95% CI [0.509-0.784], P < 0.001), while patients in the high-risk group had similar outcomes (OS, HR = 0.920, 95% CI [0.709-1.193], P = 0.509; BCSS, HR = 0.953, 95% CI [0.713-1.275], P = 0.737).ConclusionOlder female patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent surgery had better OS and BCSS than those who did not in each specific subgroup. Patients in low- or intermediate-risk group benefit from surgery while those in the high-risk group do not.
| S-EPMC8261080 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBreast surgery in cases of de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved outcomes in retrospective studies, although the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conflicting. We aimed to investigate whether surgery in this context prolongs patient survival.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature to identify RCTs comparing surgery of primary breast cancer to no surgery in patients with de novo MBC. Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline (OVID), and Web of Science were searched with latest update in July 2023, while conference proceedings were manually searched. Data concerning patient and tumor characteristics, as well as outcomes, were extracted. A meta-analysis with random effects models was performed considering heterogeneity between trials.ResultsOverall, 3255 entries were identified and 5 RCTs fulfilled all inclusion criteria, which had enrolled 1381 patients. The overall estimation in the intention-to-treat population showed no benefit for patients who had surgical excision of the primary breast tumor (HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.14). No subgroups in terms of receptor status or patterns of metastasis seemed to benefit from surgery, except for younger/premenopausal patients (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.94). Breast surgery was associated with improved local progression-free survival (HR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.19-0.74).ConclusionSurgery of the primary tumor in patients with de novo MBC does not prolong survival, except possibly in younger/premenopausal patients. Breast surgery should be offered within the context of well-designed clinical trials examining the issue.
| S-EPMC10769792 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of surgery on the survival and prognosis of patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Patients with multifocal ICCA were selected from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database between 2010 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in survival between the surgery group and the non-surgery group. We applied the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In total, 580 patients were enrolled in our study, including 151 patients who underwent surgery and 429 patients who did not. The median survival time of surgical patients was longer than non-surgical patients (OS: 25 months vs. 8 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 40 months vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year survival rate in the surgery group was significantly higher than those in the non-surgery group (5-year OS rate: 12.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate:26.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the OS (HR:0.299, 95% CI: 0.229-0.390, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR:0.305, 95% CI:0.222-0.419, p < 0.001) of patients undergoing surgical resection were significantly improved. Meanwhile, after propensity score matching (PSM) of the original data, we come to the same conclusion.
| S-EPMC8190174 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to explore the role of local ablative treatment (LAT) in metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients who received chemotherapy and identify patients who will most likely benefit.MethodsWe analyzed data of metastatic ESCC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the unadjusted clinicopathological categorical variables between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the differences between the two groups.ResultsOverall, 720 metastatic ESCC patients treated with chemotherapy were analyzed in this study; 63.2% of patients (n = 455) received LAT, including radiotherapy (n = 444), primary site surgery (n = 12), or lymph node dissection (n = 27). Gender (HR = 1.220, 95% CI: 1.024-1.453, p = 0.026), bone metastases (HR = 1.559, 95% CI: 1.292-1.882, p < 0.001), and liver metastases (HR = 1.457, 95% CI: 1.237-1.716, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors in the entire population. However, LAT was not an independent prognostic factor. Further subgroup analyses showed that LAT improved OS from 8.0 months to 10.0 months in patients with metastases other than bone/liver (HR = 0.759, 95% CI: 0.600-0.961, p = 0.022). LAT was not a prognostic factor in patients with bone/liver metastases (HR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.799-1.239, p = 0.961). After PSM, the median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.8 months) and patients who received LAT had a better OS than patients without LAT (HR = 0.796, 95% CI: 0.653-0.968, p = 0.023). Patients with metastases other than bone/liver could benefit from LAT compared with those with bone/liver metastases.ConclusionsOur study indicated that metastatic ESCC patients with metastases other than bone/liver could derive additional benefit from LAT with systemic chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC9243329 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe lung is a common site for cancer metastasis. Some cancer patients would develop lung metastases throughout the course of their illness. However, choosing surgical resection of the primary tumor (SRPT) or palliative treatment in patients with lung metastases remains controversial.MethodsLung metastatic patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Selected patients were divided into two subgroups (surgery and non-surgery). Further, all the 58 tumor types were classified into 13 subtypes. The clinical and demographic features were examined by the Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, or z-test. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimator and a log-rank test for each primary tumor type. Multivariable survival analyses of OS were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsAmong the 118,088 patients selected for study, 18,688 (15.83%) patients had undergone surgery. The analyses demonstrated that there was a significant association between SRPT and better OS in patients with lung metastases. The median survival time increased from 4.0 months in the non-surgery group to 19.0 months in the surgery group. Multivariate Cox regression analyses further validated that patients who underwent SRPT had an improved OS.ConclusionsThe current study demonstrated that patients with lung metastases can benefit from SRPT. SRPT should be considered in patients with lung metastases. Properly designed prospective randomized clinical trials would be required to further verify the conclusion.
| S-EPMC10248564 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is not well determined whether primary tumor resection is associated with better outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the prognostic role of primary tumor resection in mCRC treated with bevacizumab. Electronic databases including the Cochrane library, Embase, and Pubmed were searched until April 2018. Clinical studies assessing the influence of primary tumor resection on the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with mCRC were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Seven studies including 2760 mCRC patients were finally included. The results of the meta-analysis were in favor of bevacizumab to patients with resected primary tumor in terms of OS (HR?=?0.50, 95%CI: 0.39-0.64; p?<?0.01), and PFS (HR?=?0.65, 95%CI: 0.51-0.81; p?<?0.01). Administration of bevacizumab in mCRC patients with resected primary tumor had a better OS (HR?=?0.65, 95%CI: 0.56-0.74; p?<?0.01), when compared to chemotherapy(CT). Adding bevacizumab to mCRC patients without resection of primary tumor also had a better OS (HR?=?0.78, 95%CI: 0.65-0.94; p?<?0.01) and PFS (HR?=?0.71, 95%CI: 0.57-0.88; p?<?0.01) compared to chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, mCRC patients with resected primary tumor have better survival than those without surgery of primary tumor when treated with bevacizumab. Primary tumor resection status should be taken into consideration when using bevacizumab in mCRC.
| S-EPMC6937309 | biostudies-literature