Local Surgery Improves Survival in Patients with Primary Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhao YY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7490663 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPrimary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is a rare genitourinary malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of surgery on survival of patients diagnosed with PUC.MethodsA total of 1544 PUC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified based on the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and the Fine and Gray competing risks analysis were performed to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The multivariate Cox regression model and competing risks regression model were used to identify independent risk factors of OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS).ResultsThe 5-yr OS was significantly better in patients who received either local therapy (39.8%) or radical surgery (44.7%) compared to patients receiving no surgery of the primary site (21.5%) (p < 0.001). Both local therapy and radical surgery were each independently associated with decreased CSM, with predicted 5-yr cumulative incidence of 45.4 and 43.3%, respectively, compared to 64.7% for patients receiving no surgery of the primary site (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that primary site surgery was independently associated with better OS (local therapy, p = 0.037; radical surgery, p < 0.001) and decreased CSM (p = 0.003). Similar results were noted regardless of age, sex, T stage, N stage, and AJCC prognostic groups based on subgroup analysis. However, patients with M1 disease who underwent primary site surgery did not exhibit any survival benefit.ConclusionSurgery for the primary tumor conferred a survival advantage in non-metastatic PUC patients.
| S-EPMC8314574 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Surgery has been the primary treatment in patients with localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) for many decades, whereas it remains controversial regarding the efficacy of primary tumor resection for metastatic GISTs treated with chemotherapy, and likewise it is unclear who would benefit from the surgical resection. Methods: GISTs patients with distant metastases were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of surgery on survival. Results: In total, of 455 patients with metastatic GISTs, 235 patients (51.6%) underwent primary tumor resection and 220 patients (48.4%) did not. Median survival of patients in resection group was 72 (95% CI: 62.90-81.10) months vs. 40 (95% CI: 29.53-50.47) months for those in non-resection group (p < 0.001). Similarly, surgery in conjunction with chemotherapy led to a favorable impact on survival than chemotherapy alone (OS: 72 vs. 40 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 74 vs. 44 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that both OS (HR: 0.581, 95% CI: 0.386-0.874, p = 0.009) and CSS (HR: 0.663, 95% CI: 0.439-0.912, p = 0.042] were dramatically improved in patients with surgical removal of primary site, as well as primary tumor size between 5 and 10 cm, while increasing age was predictive of poorer survival. Stratified analysis revealed that patients with tumor locations in the stomach demonstrated a prolonged survival after surgery, with no significant differential surgical effect between the stomach and small intestine. Conclusions: Our study preliminarily suggests that carefully selected patients with metastatic GISTs might prolong survival after treatment of surgery, especially those with a primary tumor between 5 and 10 cm and a tumor located in the stomach.
| S-EPMC7466430 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe aim of this study was to establish individualized nomograms to predict survival outcomes in older female patients with stage IV breast cancer who did or did not undergo local surgery, and to determine which patients could benefit from surgery.MethodsA total of 3,129 female patients with stage IV breast cancer aged ≥70 years between 2010 and 2015 were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. Nomograms and risk stratification models were constructed.ResultsPatients who underwent surgery had better OS (HR = 0.751, 95% CI [0.668-0.843], P < 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.713, 95% CI [0.627-0.810], P < 0.001) than patients who did not undergo surgery. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, lung or liver metastases may not benefit from surgery. In the stratification model, low-risk patients benefited from surgery (OS, HR = 0.688, 95% CI [0.568-0.833], P < 0.001; BCSS, HR = 0.632, 95% CI [0.509-0.784], P < 0.001), while patients in the high-risk group had similar outcomes (OS, HR = 0.920, 95% CI [0.709-1.193], P = 0.509; BCSS, HR = 0.953, 95% CI [0.713-1.275], P = 0.737).ConclusionOlder female patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent surgery had better OS and BCSS than those who did not in each specific subgroup. Patients in low- or intermediate-risk group benefit from surgery while those in the high-risk group do not.
| S-EPMC8261080 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of surgery on the survival and prognosis of patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Patients with multifocal ICCA were selected from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database between 2010 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in survival between the surgery group and the non-surgery group. We applied the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In total, 580 patients were enrolled in our study, including 151 patients who underwent surgery and 429 patients who did not. The median survival time of surgical patients was longer than non-surgical patients (OS: 25 months vs. 8 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 40 months vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year survival rate in the surgery group was significantly higher than those in the non-surgery group (5-year OS rate: 12.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate:26.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the OS (HR:0.299, 95% CI: 0.229-0.390, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR:0.305, 95% CI:0.222-0.419, p < 0.001) of patients undergoing surgical resection were significantly improved. Meanwhile, after propensity score matching (PSM) of the original data, we come to the same conclusion.
| S-EPMC8190174 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to explore the role of local ablative treatment (LAT) in metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients who received chemotherapy and identify patients who will most likely benefit.MethodsWe analyzed data of metastatic ESCC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the unadjusted clinicopathological categorical variables between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the differences between the two groups.ResultsOverall, 720 metastatic ESCC patients treated with chemotherapy were analyzed in this study; 63.2% of patients (n = 455) received LAT, including radiotherapy (n = 444), primary site surgery (n = 12), or lymph node dissection (n = 27). Gender (HR = 1.220, 95% CI: 1.024-1.453, p = 0.026), bone metastases (HR = 1.559, 95% CI: 1.292-1.882, p < 0.001), and liver metastases (HR = 1.457, 95% CI: 1.237-1.716, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors in the entire population. However, LAT was not an independent prognostic factor. Further subgroup analyses showed that LAT improved OS from 8.0 months to 10.0 months in patients with metastases other than bone/liver (HR = 0.759, 95% CI: 0.600-0.961, p = 0.022). LAT was not a prognostic factor in patients with bone/liver metastases (HR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.799-1.239, p = 0.961). After PSM, the median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.8 months) and patients who received LAT had a better OS than patients without LAT (HR = 0.796, 95% CI: 0.653-0.968, p = 0.023). Patients with metastases other than bone/liver could benefit from LAT compared with those with bone/liver metastases.ConclusionsOur study indicated that metastatic ESCC patients with metastases other than bone/liver could derive additional benefit from LAT with systemic chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC9243329 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPancreatic head adenocarcinoma (PHAC), a malignant tumour, has a very poor prognosis, and the existing prognostic tools lack good predictive power. This study aimed to develop a better nomogram to predict overall survival after resection of non-metastatic PHAC.MethodsPatients with non-metastatic PHAC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided randomly into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Cox regression analysis was used to screen prognostic factors and construct the nomogram. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. The predictive accuracy and clinical benefits of the nomogram were validated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsFrom 2010 to 2016, 6419 patients with non-metastatic PHAC who underwent surgery were collected from the SEER database. A model including T stage, N stage, grade, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy was constructed. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.676, and the AUCs of the model assessing survival at multiple timepoints within 60 months were significantly higher than those of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system in the training cohort. Calibration curves showed that the nomogram had ability to predict the actual survival. The NRI, IDI, and DCA curves also indicated that our nomogram had higher predictive capability and clinical utility than the AJCC staging system.ConclusionsOur nomogram has an ability to predict overall survival after resection of non-metastatic PHAC and includes prognostic factors that are easy to obtain in clinical practice. It would help assist clinicians to conduct personalized medicine.
| S-EPMC8106852 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is not well determined whether primary tumor resection is associated with better outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the prognostic role of primary tumor resection in mCRC treated with bevacizumab. Electronic databases including the Cochrane library, Embase, and Pubmed were searched until April 2018. Clinical studies assessing the influence of primary tumor resection on the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with mCRC were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Seven studies including 2760 mCRC patients were finally included. The results of the meta-analysis were in favor of bevacizumab to patients with resected primary tumor in terms of OS (HR?=?0.50, 95%CI: 0.39-0.64; p?<?0.01), and PFS (HR?=?0.65, 95%CI: 0.51-0.81; p?<?0.01). Administration of bevacizumab in mCRC patients with resected primary tumor had a better OS (HR?=?0.65, 95%CI: 0.56-0.74; p?<?0.01), when compared to chemotherapy(CT). Adding bevacizumab to mCRC patients without resection of primary tumor also had a better OS (HR?=?0.78, 95%CI: 0.65-0.94; p?<?0.01) and PFS (HR?=?0.71, 95%CI: 0.57-0.88; p?<?0.01) compared to chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, mCRC patients with resected primary tumor have better survival than those without surgery of primary tumor when treated with bevacizumab. Primary tumor resection status should be taken into consideration when using bevacizumab in mCRC.
| S-EPMC6937309 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Whether primary tumor surgery should be performed in breast cancer patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis has been debated for decades. This study aims to evaluate the value of primary tumor surgery with respect to the mortality of patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer and to define the heterogeneity of this population. Methods De novo stage IV patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER) from 2010 to 2015 were included in our study. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to achieve balanced baseline characteristics. The effect of surgery was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. Results Of the 11,684 patients eligible for analysis, 3,730 (31.92%) received primary tumor surgery. Multivariate Cox regression in the PSM cohort revealed that surgery was associated with better outcomes than those in the nonsurgery group in terms of overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.48–0.55; P<0.001] and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.47–0.55; P<0.001). IPTW analysis yielded similar results. In a subgroup analysis, surgery was associated with better survival in all subtypes with low metastatic burdens (≤2 metastatic sites), but triple-negative breast cancer with a high metastatic burden (>2 metastatic sites) did not benefit from surgery (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.31–1.97, P=0.596 and 0.78, 95% CI: 0.31–1.97, P=0.596 for OS and BCSS, respectively). Conclusions Primary tumor surgery significantly prolonged the survival of patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer. However, triple-negative breast cancer patients with more than two metastatic sites may not benefit from surgery.
| S-EPMC8798644 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PI-DLBCL) are rarely reported. We aimed to explore the role of surgery in patients with PI-DLBCL.MethodsAdult PI-DLBCL patients were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The effect of surgery was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reinforce our results. Lasso regression was utilized to determine independent risk factors of overall survival (OS) for a nomogram and a novel web-based calculator. The performance of the model was measured via concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration plots in both cohorts.ResultsOverall, 1602 patients with PI-DLBCL were analyzed. Surgery significantly improved survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, respectively). Before PSM, local tumor destruction (LTD) displayed a survival advantage over resection in patients without chemotherapy (p = 0.034). After PSM, surgery was still identified as a beneficial factor for OS (p = 0.0015). However, there was no statistical difference between LTD and resection (p = 0.32). The nomogram for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS predictions exhibited dependable consistency between internal and external validation.ConclusionThis study approves the beneficial effect of surgery on clinical endpoints in PI-DLBCL patients. For those who are not suitable for resection, LTD may also be a practical option. The predictive nomogram and the web-based calculator could help clinicians individually evaluate the prognosis and optimize personalized treatment decisions for these patients.
| S-EPMC8124121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBreast surgery for stage IV breast cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of breast surgery on survival of stage IV breast cancer patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015.MethodsIn total, 13,034 patients were selected and divided into surgery and non-surgery groups. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine factors related to survival. Propensity score matching method was utilized to achieve balanced covariates across different groups. One-to-one (1:1) PSM was conducted to construct a matched sample consisting of pairs of surgery and non-surgery subjects. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) of the two groups were assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Stratified analysis according to different variables was also performed.ResultsPatients treated with breast surgery were more likely to be younger, smaller tumor size, more advanced nodal status, higher histology grade and higher proportion of bone-only metastasis. Those who received chemotherapy and radiotherapy also tended to be treated with surgery. After adjustment for potential confounders, breast surgery group exhibited a better survival both in BCSS (HR = 0.557, 95% CI [0.523-0.594], p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.571, 95% CI [0.537-0.607], p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the surgery and non-surgery group consisted of 2,269 patients respectively. The median survival time was 43 months for the surgery group and 27 months for the non-surgery group. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that breast surgery could clearly improve both the BCSS and OS for patients with stage IV breast cancer. On multivariate analysis, surgery group was associated with a better survival compared with the non-surgery group (BCSS: HR = 0.542, 95% CI [0.499-0.589], p < 0.001; OS: HR = 0.555, 95% CI [0.512-0.601], p < 0.001). Furthermore, this survival advantage persisted in all subgroups irrespective of age, race, tumor size, nodal status, histology grade, molecular subtype, chemotherapy status, radiotherapy status or status of distant metastasis.ConclusionOur study provided additional evidence that patients with stage IV breast cancer could benefit from breast surgery and it might play a more important role in multimodality therapy.
| S-EPMC7085290 | biostudies-literature