Dataset Information

Quantification of bone flare on 18F-NaF PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Bone flare has been observed on 99mTc-MDP bone scans of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This exploratory study investigates bone flare in mCRPC patients receiving androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors using 18F-NaF PET/CT. METHODS:Twenty-nine mCRPC patients undergoing AR-inhibiting therapy (abiraterone, orteronel, enzalutamide) received NaF PET/CT scans at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of treatment. SUV metrics were extracted globally for each patient (SUV) and for each individual lesion (iSUV). Bone flare was defined as increasing SUV metrics or lesion number at week 6 followed by subsequent week 12 decrease. Differences in metrics across timepoints were compared using Wilcoxon tests. Cox proportional hazard regression was conducted between global metrics and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS:Total SUV was most sensitive for flare detection and was identified in 14/23 (61%) patients receiving CYP17A1-inhibitors (abiraterone, orteronel), and not identified in any of six patients receiving enzalutamide. The appearance of new lesions did not account for initial increases in SUV metrics. iSUV metrics followed patient-level trends: bone flare positive patients showed a median of 72% (range: 0-100%) of lesions with total iSUV flare. Increasing mean SUV at week 6 correlated with extended PFS (HR?=?0.58, p?=?0.02). CONCLUSION:NaF PET bone flare was present on 61% of mCRPC patients in the first 6 weeks of treatment with CYP17A1-inhibitors. Characterization provided in this study suggests favorable PFS in patients showing bone flare. This characterization of NaF flare is important for guiding treatment assessment schedules to better distinguish between patients showing bone flare and those truly progressing, and should be performed for all emerging mCRPC treatments and imaging agents.

SUBMITTER: Weisman AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7490782 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantification of bone flare on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Weisman Amy J AJ Harmon Stephanie A SA Perk Timothy G TG Eickhoff Jens J Choyke Peter L PL Kurdziel Karen A KA Dahut William L WL Humm John L JL Apolo Andrea B AB Larson Steven M SM Morris Michael J MJ Perlman Scott B SB Liu Glenn G Jeraj Robert R

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 20181109 2

<h4>Background</h4>Bone flare has been observed on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MDP bone scans of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This exploratory study investigates bone flare in mCRPC patients receiving androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors using <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT.<h4>Methods</h4>Twenty-nine mCRPC patients undergoing AR-inhibiting therapy (abiraterone, orteronel, enzalutamide) received NaF PET/CT scans at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of treatment. SUV metrics we ...[more]

PMID: 30413807

Similar Datasets

Project description:The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFBC PET/CT, a first-generation 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent, and 18F-NaF PET/CT, a sensitive marker of osteoblastic activity, in a prospective cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: Twenty-eight prostate cancer patients with metastatic disease on conventional imaging prospectively received up to 4 PET/CT scans. All patients completed baseline 18F-DCFBC PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT scans, and 23 patients completed follow-up imaging, with a median follow-up interval of 5.7 mo (range, 4.2-12.6 mo). Lesion detection was compared across the 2 PET/CT agents at each time point. Detection and SUV characteristics of each PET/CT agent were compared with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and treatment status at the time of baseline imaging using nonparametric statistical testing (Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon rank). Results: Twenty-six patients had metastatic disease detected on 18F-NaF or 18F-DCFBC at baseline, and 2 patients were negative on both scans. Three patients demonstrated soft tissue-only disease. Of 241 lesions detected at baseline, 56 were soft-tissue lesions identified by 18F-DCFBC only and 185 bone lesions detected on 18F-NaF or 18F-DCFBC. 18F-NaF detected significantly more bone lesions than 18F-DCFBC (P < 0.001). Correlation of PSA with patient-level SUV metrics was strong in 18F-DCFBC (? > 0.5, P < 0.01) and poor in 18F-NaF (? < 0.3, P > 0.1). When PSA levels were combined with treatment status, patients with below-median levels of PSA (<2 ng/mL) on androgen deprivation therapy (n = 11) demonstrated more lesions on 18F-NaF than 18F-DCFBC (P = 0.02). In PSA greater than 2 ng/mL, patients on androgen deprivation therapy (n = 8) showed equal to or more lesions on 18F-DCFBC than on 18F-NaF. Conclusion: The utility of PSMA-targeting imaging in metastatic prostate cancer appears to depend on patient disease course and treatment status. Compared with 18F-NaF PET/CT, 18F-DCFBC PET/CT detected significantly fewer bone lesions in the setting of early or metastatic castrate-sensitive disease on treatment. However, in advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, 18F-DCFBC PET/CT shows good concordance with NaF PET/CT.

Project description:UnlabelledConventional imaging modalities (CIMs) have limited sensitivity and specificity for detection of metastatic prostate cancer. We examined the potential of a first-in-class radiofluorinated small-molecule inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), to detect metastatic hormone-naïve (HNPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).MethodsSeventeen patients were prospectively enrolled (9 HNPC and 8 CRPC); 16 had CIM evidence of new or progressive metastatic prostate cancer and 1 had high clinical suspicion of metastatic disease. (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT imaging was obtained with 2 successive PET scans starting at 2 h after injection. Patients were imaged with CIM at approximately the time of PET. A lesion-by-lesion analysis of PET to CIM was performed in the context of either HNPC or CRPC. The patients were followed with available clinical imaging as a reference standard to determine the true nature of identified lesions on PET and CIM.ResultsOn the lesion-by-lesion analysis, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect a larger number of lesions (592 positive with 63 equivocal) than CIM (520 positive with 61 equivocal) overall, in both HNPC and CRPC patients. (18)F-DCFBC PET detection of lymph nodes, bone lesions, and visceral lesions was superior to CIM. When intrapatient clustering effects were considered, (18)F-DCFBC PET was estimated to be positive in a large proportion of lesions that would be negative or equivocal on CIM (0.45). On follow-up, the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC PET (0.92) was superior to CIM (0.71). (18)F-DCFBC tumor uptake was increased at the later PET time point (~2.5 h after injection), with background uptake showing a decreasing trend on later PET.ConclusionPET imaging with (18)F-DCFBC, a small-molecule PSMA-targeted radiotracer, detected more lesions than CIM and promises to diagnose and stage patients with metastatic prostate cancer more accurately than current imaging methods.

Dataset Information

Quantification of bone flare on 18F-NaF PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Publications

Quantification of bone flare on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets