Dataset Information

State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion.

ABSTRACT: Why do some people comply with their obligation to pay taxes while others do not? Scholars of tax behavior, particularly economists and political scientists, have relied on models of state coercion and state reciprocity to answer this question. Neither state coercion nor state reciprocity, however, sufficiently account for individuals who voluntarily comply with their tax obligations to the state. We offer a third explanation, derived from the new sociology of morality and moral psychology, suggesting that two types of moral attitudes (moral imperatives and moral alignment) affect tax compliance. Using a factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion and a survey questionnaire administered to a nationally representative random sample of U.S. adults, we provide a systematic test of the three different models of tax compliance. The results yield strong support for moral attitudes (both moral imperatives and moral alignment) and state coercion, but little support for state reciprocity. We review the implications of our findings in the discussion and conclusion.

SUBMITTER: Robbins B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7494953 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion.

Robbins Blaine B Kiser Edgar E

Social science research 20200729

Why do some people comply with their obligation to pay taxes while others do not? Scholars of tax behavior, particularly economists and political scientists, have relied on models of state coercion and state reciprocity to answer this question. Neither state coercion nor state reciprocity, however, sufficiently account for individuals who voluntarily comply with their tax obligations to the state. We offer a third explanation, derived from the new sociology of morality and moral psychology, sugg ...[more]

PMID: 32933646

Similar Datasets

Project description:The datasets included in this article come from a survey carried out on a group of Polish students and self-employed entrepreneurs and were originally created for studies on tax behaviour under the slippery slope framework. The slippery slope framework explains the role of extensive power execution and building trust in the tax administration in enhancing either enforced or voluntary tax compliance accordingly [1]. Students of economics, finance, and management at the Faculty of Economic Sciences and the Faculty of Management at the University of Warsaw were surveyed in two rounds, in 2011 and 2022, using paper-based questionnaires handed to them personally. Entrepreneurs were invited to fill in online questionnaires in 2020. Questionnaires were filled in by self-employed individuals from the Kuyavia-Pomerania, Lower Silesia, Lublin, and Silesia Province. The datasets provide 599 records for students and 422 observations for entrepreneurs. The purpose of collecting these data was to analyse the attitudes of the mentioned social groups towards tax compliance and tax evasion under the slippery slope framework along two dimensions: trust in authorities and power of authorities. The sample was selected because students in these fields are the most likely to become entrepreneurs, so the study sought to capture the potential behavioural change that is taking place. Each questionnaire consisted of three parts, a description of a fictitious country (Varosia) in one of four scenarios: (1) high trust-high power; (2) low trust-high power; (3) high trust-low power; (4) low trust-low power, 28 questions including manipulation checks on trust in authorities and power of authorities, intended tax compliance, voluntary tax compliance, enforced tax compliance, intended tax evasion, tax morale and the perceived similarity between Varosia and Poland, and finally two questions on gender and age of respondents. The data presented are particularly useful for policymakers in shaping tax policy and economists in analyses regarding taxation. Researchers may be interested in reusing the provided datasets for comparative research in other social groups, regions, and countries.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between the presence and generosity of state-level Earned Income Tax Credits (EITC) and multiple self-reported measures of general health.Data sourcesData on state-level tax credits and covariates were obtained from the National Bureau of Economic Research and University of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research, respectively. These data were merged with Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey records from 1993-2016.Study designUsing difference-in-differences approaches and survey-weighted Poisson regression that accounted for clustering of observations and included state and year fixed-effects, we assessed relationships between EITC and self-reported overall health, frequent mental distress, and frequent poor physical health in the prior 30 days. Covariates included state minimum wage, state GDP, and adoption of Medicaid expansion. Sensitivity analyses revealed that parallel trends were plausible; there were no significant lead and lag effects.Data extraction methodsAnalyses were restricted to respondents with no more than a high school diploma or equivalent because less-educated adults are more likely to be low-wage earners and therefore qualify for EITC.Principal findingsAmong adults with no education beyond high school (n = 2 884 790), each additional 10-percentage-point increase in the generosity of state EITC-relative to the federal credit-was associated with fewer reports of frequent mental distress (-97.3 per 100 000; 95% CI: -237.2, 42.6) and frequent poor physical health (-149.6 per 100 000; 95% CI: -284.4, -14.9). When restricted to individuals interviewed during the three months when tax rebates are commonly disbursed, the magnitude of the association between EITC and prevalence of reported frequent mental distress was greater (-329.7 per 100 000; 95% CI: -636.0, -23.5).ConclusionsThe generosity of state EITC policies is positively associated with significant reductions in frequent mental distress and poor physical health, especially during months when the credit is received. Interventions to reduce poverty may positively impact health by reducing material hardship and stress.

Dataset Information

State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion.

Publications

State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets