Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Validation of Psychometric Properties of the Itch Numeric Rating Scale for Pruritus Associated With Prurigo Nodularis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

There is an unmet need for psychometrically sound instruments to measure pruritus associated with prurigo nodularis (PN).

Objective

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the itch numeric rating scale (itch NRS), both the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) and the Average Itch Numeric Rating Scale (AI-NRS).

Design, setting, and participants

This secondary analysis is based on a secondary end point of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial of serlopitant for treatment of pruritus associated with PN. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 15 sites in Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years and had generalized PN for more than 6 weeks that was refractory to previous antipruritic therapies. Patients were required to have a visual analog scale itch score of 7 or higher at screening. Data were collected from July 2014 to June 2016 and analyzed from June 2016 to January 2017.

Main outcomes and measures

The itch NRS (AI-NRS and WI-NRS) was correlated together with the following measures: the electronic verbal rating scale (eVRS) for itch self-categorization, average itch visual analog scale (AI-VAS), worst itch visual analog scale (WI-VAS), the pruritus-specific quality-of-life rating instrument ItchyQoL, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Prurigo Activity and Severity Score (items 7b and 7a: percentage healed prurigo lesions and percentage of prurigo lesions with excoriations).

Results

There were 123 participants in this study; the mean (SD) age of participants was 57.3 (11.58) years, and 58 (47.2%) were male. Strong associations (r ≥ 0.5) were observed between itch NRS items (WI-NRS and AI-NRS) and AI-VAS (24 hours) at weeks 2, 4, and 8 (r = 0.72-0.90; P < .001). Similar strong associations were also observed between itch NRS items and WI-VAS (24 hours) and eVRS for itch severity across weeks 2, 4, and 8 (r = 0.65-0.92; all P < .001). Strong correlations were seen between change scores for WI-NRS and WI-VAS and AI-VAS (r = 0.76 and 0.70, respectively; both P < .001). Similar findings were seen for AI-NRS, where correlations between change scores for WI-VAS and AI-VAS were 0.71 and 0.72, respectively (both P < .001). Analyses for the itch NRS items also showed that test-retest reliability was acceptable and provided evidence of acceptable convergent validity based on the eVRS and visit verbal rating score for itch self-categorization, ItchyQoL, and DLQI.

Conclusions and relevance

Results from this secondary analysis show that the itch NRS items WI-NRS and AI-NRS have good psychometric properties for pruritus associated with PN and should be considered acceptable tools for assessing pruritus in future clinical trials of PN.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02196324.

SUBMITTER: Kimel M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7495327 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10307761 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10960880 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10701428 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6850643 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8709801 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9796585 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10796623 | biostudies-literature
2022-10-31 | GSE210854 | GEO
| PRJNA867704 | ENA
| S-EPMC9921813 | biostudies-literature