irtplay: An R Package for Online Item Calibration, Scoring, Evaluation of Model Fit, and Useful Functions for Unidimensional IRT.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lim H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7495796 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Researchers are commonly interested in group comparisons such as comparisons of group means, called impact, or comparisons of individual scores across groups. A meaningful comparison can be made between the groups when there is no differential item functioning (DIF) or differential test functioning (DTF). During the past three decades, much progress has been made in detecting DIF and DTF. However, little research has been conducted on what researchers can do after such detection. This study presents and evaluates a confirmatory multigroup multidimensional item response model to obtain the purified item parameter estimates, person scores, and impact estimates on the primary dimension, controlling for the secondary dimension due to DIF. In addition, the item response model approach was compared with current practices of DIF treatment such as deleting and ignoring DIF items and using multigroup item response models through simulation studies. The authors suggested guidelines for DIF treatment based on the simulation study results.
| S-EPMC5978721 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Item replenishment is important for maintaining a large-scale item bank. In this article, the authors consider calibrating new items based on pre-calibrated operational items under the deterministic inputs, noisy-and-gate model, the specification of which includes the so-called Q -matrix, as well as the slipping and guessing parameters. Making use of the maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimators for the latent knowledge states, the authors propose two methods for the calibration. These methods are applicable to both traditional paper-pencil-based tests, for which the selection of operational items is prefixed, and computerized adaptive tests, for which the selection of operational items is sequential and random. Extensive simulations are done to assess and to compare the performance of these approaches. Extensions to other diagnostic classification models are also discussed.
| S-EPMC5978572 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this article, the practical consequences of violations of unidimensionality on selection decisions in the framework of unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models are investigated based on simulated data. The factors manipulated include the severity of violations, the proportion of misfitting items, and test length. The outcomes that were considered are the precision and accuracy of the estimated model parameters, the correlations of estimated ability ([Formula: see text]) and number-correct ([Formula: see text]) scores with the true ability ([Formula: see text]), the ranks of the examinees and the overlap between sets of examinees selected based on either [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], or [Formula: see text] scores, and the bias in criterion-related validity estimates. Results show that the [Formula: see text] values were unbiased by violations of unidimensionality, but their precision decreased as multidimensionality and the proportion of misfitting items increased; the estimated item parameters were robust to violations of unidimensionality. The correlations between [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] scores, the agreement between the three selection criteria, and the accuracy of criterion-related validity estimates are all negatively affected, to some extent, by increasing levels of multidimensionality and the proportion of misfitting items. However, removing the misfitting items only improved the results in the case of severe multidimensionality and large proportion of misfitting items, and deteriorated them otherwise.
| S-EPMC5533251 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this manuscript, the applicability of the Hausman test to the evaluation of item response models is investigated. The Hausman test is a general test of model fit. The test assesses whether for a model in question the parameter estimates of two different estimators coincide. The test can be implemented for item response models by comparing the parameter estimates of the marginal maximum likelihood estimator with the corresponding parameter estimates of a limited information estimator. For a correctly specified item response model, the difference of the two estimates is normally distributed around zero. The Hausman test can be used for the evaluation of item fit and global model fit. The performance of the test is evaluated in a simulation study. The simulation study suggests that the implemented versions of the test adhere to the nominal Type-I error rate well in samples of 1000 test takers and more. The test is also capable to detect misspecified item characteristic functions, but lacks power to detect violations of the conditional independence assumption.
| S-EPMC7026385 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Item calibration is a technique to estimate characteristics of questions (called items) for achievement tests. In computerized tests, item calibration is an important tool for maintaining, updating and developing new items for an item bank. To efficiently sample examinees with specific ability levels for this calibration, we use optimal design theory assuming that the probability to answer correctly follows an item response model. Locally optimal unrestricted designs have usually a few design points for ability. In practice, it is hard to sample examinees from a population with these specific ability levels due to unavailability or limited availability of examinees. To counter this problem, we use the concept of optimal restricted designs and show that this concept naturally fits to item calibration. We prove an equivalence theorem needed to verify optimality of a design. Locally optimal restricted designs provide intervals of ability levels for optimal calibration of an item. When assuming a two-parameter logistic model, several scenarios with D-optimal restricted designs are presented for calibration of a single item and simultaneous calibration of several items. These scenarios show that the naive way to sample examinees around unrestricted design points is not optimal.
| S-EPMC6820328 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Testing item-level fit is important in scale development to guide item revision/deletion. Many item-level fit indices have been proposed in literature, yet none of them were directly applicable to an important family of models, namely, the higher order item response theory (HO-IRT) models. In this study, chi-square-based fit indices (i.e., Yen's Q 1, McKinley and Mill's G 2, Orlando and Thissen's S-X 2, and S-G 2) were extended to HO-IRT models. Their performances are evaluated via simulation studies in terms of false positive rates and correct detection rates. The manipulated factors include test structure (i.e., test length and number of dimensions), sample size, level of correlations among dimensions, and the proportion of misfitting items. For misfitting items, the sources of misfit, including the misfitting item response functions, and misspecifying factor structures were also manipulated. The results from simulation studies demonstrate that the S-G 2 is promising for higher order items.
| S-EPMC6291895 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This article analyzes data from U.S. Navy sailors (N = 8,956), with the central measure being the Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (NCAPS). Analyses and results from this article extend and qualify those from previous research efforts by examining the properties of the NCAPS and its adaptive structure in more detail. Specifically, this article examines item exposure rates, the efficiency of item use based on item response theory (IRT)-based Expected A Posteriori (EAP) scoring, and a comparison of IRT-EAP scoring with much more parsimonious scoring methods that appear to work just as well (stem-level scoring and dichotomous scoring). The cutting-edge nature of adaptive personality testing will necessitate a series of future efforts like this: to examine the benefits of adaptive scoring schemes and novel measurement methods continually, while pushing testing technology further ahead.
| S-EPMC5978510 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study examined whether cutoffs in fit indices suggested for traditional formats with maximum likelihood estimators can be utilized to assess model fit and to test measurement invariance when a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis was employed for the Thurstonian item response theory (IRT) model. Regarding the performance of the evaluation criteria, detection of measurement non-invariance and Type I error rates were examined. The impact of measurement non-invariance on estimated scores in the Thurstonian IRT model was also examined through accuracy and efficiency in score estimation. The fit indices used for the evaluation of model fit performed well. Among six cutoffs for changes in model fit indices, only ΔCFI > .01 and ΔNCI > .02 detected metric non-invariance when the medium magnitude of non-invariance occurred and none of the cutoffs performed well to detect scalar non-invariance. Based on the generated sampling distributions of fit index differences, this study suggested ΔCFI > .001 and ΔNCI > .004 for scalar non-invariance and ΔCFI > .007 for metric non-invariance. Considering Type I error rate control and detection rates of measurement non-invariance, ΔCFI was recommended for measurement non-invariance tests for forced-choice format data. Challenges in measurement non-invariance tests in the Thurstonian IRT model were discussed along with the direction for future research to enhance the utility of forced-choice formats in test development for cross-cultural and international settings.
| S-EPMC7262996 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This research focuses on developing item-level fit checking procedures in the context of diagnostic classification models (DCMs), and more specifically for the "Deterministic Input; Noisy 'And' gate" (DINA) model. Although there is a growing body of literature discussing model fit checking methods for DCM, the item-level fit analysis is not adequately discussed in literature. This study intends to take an initiative to fill in this gap. Two approaches are proposed, one stems from classical goodness-of-fit test statistics coupled with the Expectation-Maximization algorithm for model estimation, and the other is the posterior predictive model checking (PPMC) method coupled with the Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation. For both approaches, the chi-square statistic and a power-divergence index are considered, along with Stone's method for considering uncertainty in latent attribute estimation. A simulation study with varying manipulated factors is carried out. Results show that both approaches are promising if Stone's method is imposed, but the classical goodness-of-fit approach has a much higher detection rate (i.e., proportion of misfit items that are correctly detected) than the PPMC method.
| S-EPMC5978514 | biostudies-other
Project description:Research related to the fit evaluation at the item level involving cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) has been scarce. According to the parsimony principle, balancing goodness of fit against model complexity is necessary. General CDMs require a larger sample size to be estimated reliably, and can lead to worse attribute classification accuracy than the appropriate reduced models when the sample size is small and the item quality is poor, which is typically the case in many empirical applications. The main purpose of this study was to systematically examine the statistical properties of four inferential item-fit statistics: S-X2 , the likelihood ratio (LR) test, the Wald (W) test, and the Lagrange multiplier (LM) test. To evaluate the performance of the statistics, a comprehensive set of factors, namely, sample size, correlational structure, test length, item quality, and generating model, is systematically manipulated using Monte Carlo methods. Results show that the S-X2 statistic has unacceptable power. Type I error and power comparisons favor LR and W tests over the LM test. However, all the statistics are highly affected by the item quality. With a few exceptions, their performance is only acceptable when the item quality is high. In some cases, this effect can be ameliorated by an increase in sample size and test length. This implies that using the above statistics to assess item fit in practical settings when the item quality is low remains a challenge.
| S-EPMC5978477 | biostudies-other