Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Mapping legal authority for terrestrial conservation corridors along streams.


ABSTRACT: Wildlife corridors aim to promote species' persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site-specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data-driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal-ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least-cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least-cost corridors in the integrated, local-scale model diverged (?25 km) from national-scale least-cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal- and naturalness-based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.

SUBMITTER: Stahl AT 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7497071 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Mapping legal authority for terrestrial conservation corridors along streams.

Stahl Amanda T AT   Fremier Alexander K AK   Cosens Barbara A BA  

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 20200323 4


Wildlife corridors aim to promote species' persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site-specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent wit  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10266011 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6145004 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4511669 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6033387 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7522118 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3710798 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7806652 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3977835 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5070544 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6215976 | biostudies-literature