Dataset Information

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics in haemophilia A: Interim results from the TAURUS study.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To report interim data from TAURUS, a study assessing real-world prophylactic treatment with unmodified, full-length recombinant FVIII BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry® ; Bayer) indicated for haemophilia A. METHODS:TAURUS (NCT02830477) is an international, open-label, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study with a one-year observation period (target N = 350). Patients have moderate or severe haemophilia A (FVIII ?5% or ?1%) and ?50 exposure days to any FVIII product. Clinician- and patient-reported outcomes are captured on previous product use, changes in prophylaxis dose and dosing frequency, FVIII consumption, reported bleeding rates, treatment satisfaction and adherence, pharmacokinetic (PK) data (if available) and safety data. RESULTS:At cut-off, baseline data were available from 160 patients (89 had ?6 months of follow-up data). Most patients had severe haemophilia A (85%), infused BAY 81-8973 ? 3×/wk (59%) and experienced a median number of total bleeds of 2.0 (non-annualised; 246 days median documentation period). Good levels of treatment satisfaction (Hemo-SATA,P ) and adherence (VERITAS-Pro) were maintained. TAURUS demonstrated a favourable PK profile of BAY 81-8973 in comparison with other standard half-life rFVIIIs and supported the WAPPS PopPK model. No patients developed inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS:TAURUS data demonstrate effective prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973 in the real world without compromising patient satisfaction or adherence.

SUBMITTER: Santoro C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7497079 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics in haemophilia A: Interim results from the TAURUS study.

Santoro Cristina C Fuh Beng B Le Phu Quoc PQ Maes Philip P Berrueco Rubén R Mingot-Castellano Eva Maria EM von Mackensen Sylvia S Solms Alexander A Wang Michael M

European journal of haematology 20200423 2

<h4>Objectives</h4>To report interim data from TAURUS, a study assessing real-world prophylactic treatment with unmodified, full-length recombinant FVIII BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry<sup>®</sup> ; Bayer) indicated for haemophilia A.<h4>Methods</h4>TAURUS (NCT02830477) is an international, open-label, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study with a one-year observation period (target N = 350). Patients have moderate or severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤5% or ≤1%) and ≥50 exposure days to any FVIII p ...[more]

PMID: 32259334

Similar Datasets

Project description:No head-to-head trials comparing recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products currently exist. This was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) and turoctocog alfa for the prophylaxis of severe hemophilia A.A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials of rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa. Comparisons were conducted using BAY 81-8973 individual patient data (IPD) from LEOPOLD trials and published data from rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa trials. Differences in outcome reporting were reconciled using transformation of BAY 81-8973 IPD. Patients in pooled LEOPOLD trials were weighted to match baseline characteristics for rAHF-PFM or turoctocog alfa trials using MAICs. After matching, annualized bleed rates (ABRs) were compared using weighted t-tests.Two rAHF-PFM trials and one turoctocog alfa trial were identified. In these trials, rFVIIIs were dosed thrice weekly or every other day; in LEOPOLD trials, BAY 81-8973 was dosed twice- or thrice weekly. Three MAICs were conducted because the two rAHF-PFM trials calculated ABRs differently, matching for age, race, and weight (turoctocog alfa only). BAY 81-8973 had similar ABR of all bleeds vs rAHF-PFM (two trials: 4.8 vs 6.3, 1.9 vs 1.8 [square root transform]) and lower ABR of spontaneous bleeds and trauma bleeds (2.6 vs 4.1, 2.1 vs 4.7; both P<0.05). BAY 81-8973 showed lower ABR of all bleeds and spontaneous bleeds vs turoctocog alfa (4.3 vs 6.5, 2.8 vs 4.3; both P<0.05) and similar ABR of trauma bleeds (1.5 vs 1.6). In subgroup analysis, twice-weekly BAY 81-8973 had similar ABRs of all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, and trauma bleeds compared to rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa.This indirect comparison found that prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973, even including the lower frequency of two times a week and lower factor VIII consumption, has efficacy comparable to rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa, which were dosed thrice weekly or every other day. The use of IPD enabled adjustments for differences in calculation of ABRs and population characteristics between trials.

Project description:IntroductionHaemophilia A is a rare inherited bleeding disease caused by the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The main treatment protocol is to administer regular exogenous FVIII concentrate infusions. With the discovery of variability in individualised pharmacokinetics (PK) and bleeding phenotype, the previous weight-based approach needs to be replaced by more advanced PK-tailored prophylaxis with an accurate evaluation system. In this study, we combine individualised PK profiles and a complementary evaluation system to guide prophylaxis in paediatric patients with haemophilia A.Methods and analysisThis is a single-centre, prospective single-arm study. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a new strategy combining PK and a complementary evaluation system to treat haemophilia A in Chinese paediatric patients. Sixty paediatric patients with haemophilia will be recruited. After PK testing, they will receive a PK-guided stepup prophylaxis in the next 2 years. The dosing regimen will be determined according to individualised PK profiles and complementary evaluation findings. Related indicators at the end of the study will be compared with the values at treatment initiation to examine the effectiveness of this new strategy. The demographic data of the investigated patients will be summarised by descriptive statistics. Quantitative data will be described by summary statistics, including arithmetic median, range, mean and arithmetic SD. Analyses will use t-test to compare indicators such as bleeding rate and imaging score at both ends of the study as well as during follow-up.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital (Number 2020-Z-095). The findings will be presented at international meetings such as World Federation of Hemophilia World Congress. Related manuscripts will be submitted to peer-review journals such as Blood and Hemophilia.Trial registration numberChiCTR2000037821; Pre-results.

Project description:Shorter, more potent regimens are needed for tuberculosis. The nitroimidazole pretomanid was recently approved for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in combination with bedaquiline and linezolid. Pretomanid may also have benefit as a treatment-shortening agent for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. It is unclear how and whether it can be used together with rifamycins, which are key sterilizing first-line drugs. In this analysis, data were pooled from two studies: the Assessing Pretomanid for Tuberculosis (APT) trial, in which patients with drug-sensitive pulmonary TB received pretomanid, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide plus either rifampin or rifabutin versus standard of care under fed conditions, and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5306 (A5306) trial, a phase I study in healthy volunteers receiving pretomanid alone or in combination with rifampin under fasting conditions. In our population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, participants taking rifampin had 44.4 and 59.3% reductions in pretomanid AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) compared to those taking rifabutin or pretomanid alone (due to 80 or 146% faster clearance) in the APT and A5306 trials, respectively. Median maximum concentrations (C max) in the rifampin and rifabutin arms were 2.14 and 3.35 mg/liter, while median AUC0-24 values were 30.1 and 59.5 mg·h/liter, respectively. Though pretomanid exposure in APT was significantly reduced with rifampin, AUC0-24 values were similar to those associated with effective treatment in registrational trials, likely because APT participants were fed with dosing, enhancing pretomanid relative bioavailability and exposures. Pretomanid concentrations with rifabutin were high but in range with prior observations. While pretomanid exposures with rifampin are unlikely to impair efficacy, our data suggest that pretomanid should be taken with food if prescribed with rifampin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02256696.).

Dataset Information

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics in haemophilia A: Interim results from the TAURUS study.

Publications

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics in haemophilia A: Interim results from the TAURUS study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets