Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Evaluating underpinning, complexity and implications of ethical situations in humanitarian operations: qualitative study through the lens of career humanitarian workers.


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Data regarding underpinning and implications of ethical challenges faced by humanitarian workers and their organisations in humanitarian operations are limited.

Methods

We conducted comprehensive, semistructured interviews with 44 experienced humanitarian aid workers, from the field to headquarters, to evaluate and describe ethical conditions in humanitarian situations.

Results

61% were female; average age was 41.8 years; 500 collective years of humanitarian experience (11.8 average) working with diverse major international non-governmental organisations. Important themes included; allocation schemes and integrity of the humanitarian industry, including resource allocation and fair access to and use of services; staff or organisational competencies and aid quality; humanitarian process and unintended consequences; corruption, diversion, complicity and competing interests, and intentions versus outcomes; professionalism and interpersonal and institutional responses; and exposure to extreme inequities and emotional and moral distress. Related concepts included broader industry context and allocations; decision-making, values, roles and sustainability; resource misuse at programme, government and international agency levels; aid effectiveness and utility versus futility, and negative consequences. Multiple contributing, confounding and contradictory factors were identified, including context complexity and multiple decision-making levels; limited input from beneficiaries of aid; different or competing social constructs, values or sociocultural differences; and shortcomings, impracticality, or competing philosophical theories or ethical frameworks.

Conclusions

Ethical situations are overarching and often present themselves outside the exclusive scope of moral reasoning, philosophical views, professional codes, ethical or legal frameworks, humanitarian principles or social constructivism. This study helped identify a common instinct to uphold fairness and justice as an underlying drive to maintain humanity through proximity, solidarity, transparency and accountability.

SUBMITTER: Asgary R 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7497554 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC1118167 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6916396 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7719274 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9926404 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7339202 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9639541 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7477609 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3220713 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8171782 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9668143 | biostudies-literature