Dataset Information

Learning to diagnose collaboratively: validating a simulation for medical students.

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Physicians with different professional backgrounds often diagnose a patients' problem collaboratively. In this article, we first introduce a process model for collaborative diagnosing (CDR model), describe the development of a simulation used to empirically examine the facilitation of collaborative diagnostic reasoning. Based on a contemporary validity framework [1], we further suggest indicators for validity and collect initial evidence with respect to the scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and implication inferences to assess the validity of the simulation when used to assess effects of learning interventions. Method: In a quasi-experimental study, we assessed objectivity and reliability of the simulation and compared medical students with low and advanced prior knowledge to practitioners with high prior knowledge with respect to their diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, information sharing skills, and their intrinsic cognitive load. Additionally, we obtained authenticity ratings from practitioners with high prior knowledge. Results: The results yielded satisfying initial evidence for the validity of the scoring and the extrapolation inferences as ratings are objective, and the simulation and the collaborative process is perceived as rather authentic. Additionally, participants on different levels of prior knowledge differ with respect to their diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, information sharing skills, and their reported intrinsic cognitive load. With one exception (information sharing skills), the generalization inference seems to be valid as well. Conclusions: We conclude that collecting validity evidence for the simulation was an important step towards a better interpretation of the simulation. We found that the simulation is an authentic and valid representation of the chosen collaborative situation and that the collected validity evidence offers sufficient evidence for an initial validation of the simulation. Nevertheless, the validation process highlighted some important gaps that need further consideration. We further conclude that applying a validation model to the context of empirical research is promising and encourage other researchers to follow the example.

SUBMITTER: Radkowitsch A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7499460 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Learning to diagnose collaboratively: validating a simulation for medical students.

Radkowitsch Anika A Fischer Martin R MR Schmidmaier Ralf R Fischer Frank F

GMS journal for medical education 20200915 5

<b>Objectives:</b> Physicians with different professional backgrounds often diagnose a patients' problem collaboratively. In this article, we first introduce a process model for collaborative diagnosing (CDR model), describe the development of a simulation used to empirically examine the facilitation of collaborative diagnostic reasoning. Based on a contemporary validity framework [1], we further suggest indicators for validity and collect initial evidence with respect to the scoring, generaliza ...[more]

PMID: 32984510

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe concept of learning style is quite important for teachers to teach, organize students' learning experiences, and accomplish educational goals. Motivation is one of the most important psychological concepts in education. Motivation is multidimensional and ranges from amotivation to extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation. When students are motivated extrinsically, they enjoy striving toward rewards and goals which may differ from individual goals. Intrinsically motivated students enjoy exploring, learning, and curiosity-oriented academic efforts. Understanding learning styles can make it easier to create, modify, and develop more efficient curriculum and educational programs. It can also encourage students' participation in these programs and motivate them to gain professional knowledge This study aims to determine the learning styles of medical school students and to evaluate whether there is a relationship between their learning styles and academic motivation and the sociodemographic variables.MethodsIn this study a questionnaire containing socio-demographic factors, Grasha-Reichmann Learning Styles Scale, Academic Motivation Scale was filled out by 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th -year medical students of the 2019-2020 academic year. Frequency, percentage, mean, ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and independent group t-test (for analyzing data with normal distribution) were applied. Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis test, and Spearman correlation analysis were used for analyzing data without normal distribution.ResultsWe found that the mean of independent learning was the highest among the learning style dimensions, and the mean of the intrinsic motivation to know (IMKN) was the highest among the academic motivation dimensions. We found that there were significant relationships between independent learning and intrinsic motivation (IM), between avoidant learning and extrinsic motivation (EM) and between collaborative learning and IMKN, IM to accomplish things (IMAT) and IM to experience stimulation (IMES).ConclusionWe think that different teaching methods can be applied to strengthen collaborative learning, participant learning, and intrinsic motivation. We hope that this research will contribute to medical education on the subject of establishing appropriate teaching methods. Teachers have to plan and implement activities based on students' learning styles and academic motivation to encourage students to effectively participate in the classroom.

Project description:AimsThe aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the application of learning strategies and the emergence of higher-order learning behaviours among medical students in Chinese provincial undergraduate colleges, while also examining the impact of social demographic variables on the development of higher-order learning behaviours and learning strategy preferences.MethodologyWe conducted a relevant cross-sectional study using the Chinese College Student Survey (CCSS) online questionnaire to evaluate higher-order learning behaviours and learning strategies in medical undergraduate students attending provincial colleges in China. A total of 992 valid questionnaires were collected and analysed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). We performed statistical analysis using one-sample t-tests to compare the results with the national norm score for medical subjects in undergraduate colleges. We also conducted variance analysis and regression analysis.ResultsThe study found that the average scores for higher-order learning behaviours, enquiry-based learning and receptive learning behaviour among medical undergraduate students in provincial colleges were higher than the national norm score for medical subjects, indicating a positive trend. However, the average scores for other indicators were lower than the national norm score. The utilization of learning strategies and the development of higher-order learning behaviours among students were affected by various factors such as grade and gender. The study suggests that the preference for certain learning strategies, such as enquiry-based, receptive, integrative and collaborative, can have a significant impact on the emergence of higher-order learning behaviours.ConclusionsThe study has demonstrated a positive correlation between the utilization of learning strategies and the development of higher-order learning behaviours. This relationship has been observed in medical students attending provincial undergraduate colleges, where the adoption of enquiry-based, receptive, integrative and collaborative learning strategies has been found to significantly influence the emergence of higher-order learning behaviours.KEY MESSAGESThe implementation of learning strategies among medical students in provincial undergraduate colleges in China has a significant impact on high-level learning behaviours.The impact of high-level learning behaviours is reliant on comprehensive support from four distinct learning strategies: receptive learning, inquiry-based learning, comprehensive learning and collaborative learning.One of the most impactful learning strategies is receptive learning, particularly on high-order learning behaviours. On the other hand, reflective learning does not seem to have a significant effect.Changes in grades can significantly impact higher-order learning behaviours and affect the propensity for reflective and collaborative learning strategies.Females generally exhibit a greater preference for receptive learning strategies, while males tend to exhibit a greater preference for inquiry-based learning strategies.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Experiential learning plays a critical role in learner development. Kolb's 4-part experiential learning model consists of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation in a recurring cycle. Most clinical environments provide opportunities for experiences and active experimentation but rarely offer structured means for reflection and abstract conceptualization that are crucial for learners to learn through experience. We created Learning Moment, a novel Web-based educational tool that integrates principles of asynchronous learning and learning portfolios to fulfill the reflection and abstract conceptualization aspects of Kolb's learning cycle in the modern clinical learning environment. Medical students log concise clinical "pearls" in the form of "learning moments" for reflection, review, and sharing with peers in a community of practice. OBJECTIVE:We sought to evaluate learners' experiences with Learning Moment via a qualitative study. METHODS:We employed purposive sampling to recruit medical students who used Learning Moment during their rotation. We conducted 13 semistructured interviews (10 individual interviews and one 3-person group interview) between January and March 2017 using an ethnographic approach and utilized a general inductive method to analyze and code for potential themes. RESULTS:A total of 13 students (five in their third year of medical school and eight in their fourth year) voluntarily participated in our qualitative interviews. Five of the 13 (38%) students intended to pursue emergency medicine as their chosen field of specialty. The median number of "learning moments" logged by these students is 6. From our analysis, three key themes emerged relating to the perceived impact of Learning Moment on student learning: (1) logging "learning moments" enhanced memorization, (2) improved learning through reflection, and (3) sharing of knowledge and experiences in a community of practice. CONCLUSIONS:Learning Moment was successfully implemented into the educational infrastructure in our department. Students identified three mechanisms by which the application optimizes experiential learning, including enabling the logging of "learning moments" to promote memorization, encouraging reflection to facilitate learning, and fostering the sharing of knowledge and experiences within a community of practice. The Learning Moment concept is potentially scalable to other departments, disciplines, and institutions as we seek to optimize experiential learning ecosystems for all trainees.

Dataset Information

Learning to diagnose collaboratively: validating a simulation for medical students.

Publications

Learning to diagnose collaboratively: validating a simulation for medical students.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets