Dataset Information

Spontaneously retrievable knowledge of German general practitioners depending on time since graduation, measured with the progress test medicine.

ABSTRACT: Background: General practitioners and general internists occupy a key position in German and Austrian healthcare systems. They provide primary care and act as gatekeepers between medical disciplines and sectors of care. Their explicit medical knowledge levels, however, can be quite disparate. Objective: This study analyses whether general practitioners' performances on a standardised knowledge test changes with four relevant socio-demographic variables. Design: The survey was based on the Progress Test Medicine (PTM), a standardised 200 item knowledge test on graduate level. After formal blueprinting and item analysis, 60 items of PTM were selected ("PTM-GP") for our study. Participants: PTM-GP was presented ad hoc to general practitioners and internists from Germany and Austria at a number of professional meetings in 2011. 161 volunteers completed the survey. Main measures: For evaluation, correlation analysis (Spearman), Kruskal Wallis-tests for non-parametric data and an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were calculated. Results: Overall, four indicators turned out to be slightly significant for the performance on the PTM-GP, namely: time passed since graduation, the grade received in the licensing examination, the type of institution for postgraduate training, and the medical specialisation. Conclusions: Recent graduates performed better in the PTM-GP; a doctor's licensing examination grade as well as training at a university hospital correlated positively with PTM-GP performance. A general doctor's knowledge level is moderately influenced by exam grades, time since graduation, the institutional affiliation of postgraduate training and medical specialisation. Individual changes in knowledge over time have to be deliberately considered in lifelong learning. In consequence, the on-going teaching of medical knowledge should be integrated mandatory and verifiable into general doctors' everyday practices, e.g. through repetitive knowledge tests with individual feedback and recommendations for further continuing medical education (CME).

SUBMITTER: Zupanic M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7499467 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Spontaneously retrievable knowledge of German general practitioners depending on time since graduation, measured with the progress test medicine.

Zupanic Michaela M Kreuer Jelena J Bauer Daniel D Nouns Zineb M ZM Ehlers Jan P JP Fischer Martin R MR

GMS journal for medical education 20200915 5

Background: General practitioners and general internists occupy a key position in German and Austrian healthcare systems. They provide primary care and act as gatekeepers between medical disciplines and sectors of care. Their explicit medical knowledge levels, however, can be quite disparate. Objective: This study analyses whether general practitioners' performances on a standardised knowledge test changes with four relevant socio-demographic variables. Design: The survey wa ...[more]

PMID: 32984508

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of medicinal plants in Mali, knowledge about how traditional practitioners (TPs) treat pregnant and lactating women is lacking. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to investigate how traditional practitioners in Mali treat common diseases and ailments during pregnancy. METHODS: Data was collected through structured interviews of traditional practitioners in one urban (Bamako) and two rural areas (Siby and Dioila) in Mali. The TPs were interviewed about how they treat common diseases and ailments during pregnancy. They were also asked to name harmful plants in pregnancy and plants that could affect breast milk production. In addition, we asked about nine specific medicinal plants commonly used in Mali; Opilia amentacea (syn. Opilia celtidifolia), Ximenia americana, Cola cordifolia, Combretum glutinosum, Parkia biglobosa, Trichilia emetica, Combretum micranthum, Lippia chevalieri and Vepris heterophylla. RESULTS: A total of 72 traditional practitioners (64% women, age: 34 to 90 years) were interviewed during an eight week period October 2011 to December 2011. They treated between 1 and 30 pregnant women with medicinal plants per months. We found a relatively high consensus for treatment of pregnant women with common diseases and ailments like nausea and dermatitis. The highest informer consensus was found for the treatment of malaria during pregnancy. TPs generally recommended pregnant women to avoid medicinal plants with bitter tastes like stem and root bark of Khaya senegalensis and Opilia amentacea (syn. Opilia celtidifolia). TPs distinguished between oral (potentially unsafe) and dermal use (safe) of Opilia amentacea (syn. Opilia celtidifolia). Cola cordifolia was used to facilitate labor. CONCLUSION: Experience and knowledge about treatment of pregnant women with medicinal plants was broad among the traditional practitioners in the three investigated regions in Mali. Collaborating with traditional practitioners on the safe use of medicinal plants in pregnancy may promote safer pregnancies and better health for mothers and their unborn infants in Mali.

Dataset Information

Spontaneously retrievable knowledge of German general practitioners depending on time since graduation, measured with the progress test medicine.

Publications

Spontaneously retrievable knowledge of German general practitioners depending on time since graduation, measured with the progress test medicine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure