S-EPMC7501907 - Intracoronary lithotripsy for calcific neoatherosclerotic in-stent restenosis: a case report. - OmicsDI

Unknown

Dataset Information

Intracoronary lithotripsy for calcific neoatherosclerotic in-stent restenosis: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In-stent restenosis is a difficult percutaneous scenario if calcific neoatherosclerosis is the underlying aetiology.

Case summary

A 69-year-old diabetic woman with a previous percutaneous coronary intervention on the left anterior descending coronary artery was readmitted for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In-stent restenosis due to calcific neoatherosclerosis was observed by intracoronary imaging during the intervention. Intravascular lithotripsy was used successfully to fracture the underlying calcific plaque. However, the balloon ruptured during treatment although this did not damage the artery.

Discussion

Intravascular lithotripsy is a promising tool for the treatment of extremely calcified lesions including calcific neoatherosclerosis of in-stent restenosis. Balloon rupture is a complication of this new percutaneous treatment that has not previously been described.

SUBMITTER: Tizon-Marcos H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7501907 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Intracoronary lithotripsy for calcific neoatherosclerotic in-stent restenosis: a case report.

Tizón-Marcos Helena H Rodríguez-Costoya Iris I Tevar Cristina C Vaquerizo Beatriz B

European heart journal. Case reports 20200609 4

<h4>Background</h4>In-stent restenosis is a difficult percutaneous scenario if calcific neoatherosclerosis is the underlying aetiology.<h4>Case summary</h4>A 69-year-old diabetic woman with a previous percutaneous coronary intervention on the left anterior descending coronary artery was readmitted for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In-stent restenosis due to calcific neoatherosclerosis was observed by intracoronary imaging during the intervention. Intravascular lithotripsy was used succ ...[more]

Similar Datasets

Project description:Given the limited salvage options for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of drug-eluting stents (DES), our high-volume cardiac catheterization laboratory has been performing intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) in patients with recurrent ISR of DES. This study analyzes their baseline characteristics and assesses the safety/toxicity of ICBT in this high-risk population.A retrospective analysis of patients treated with ICBT between September 2012 and December 2014 was performed. Patients with ISR twice in a single location were eligible. Procedural complications included vessel dissection, perforation, tamponade, slow/absent blood flow, and vessel closure. Postprocedural events included myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, stroke, bleeding, thrombosis, embolism, dissection, dialysis, or death occurring within 72 hours. A control group of patients with 2 episodes of ISR at 1 location who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention without ICBT was identified. Unpaired t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare the groups.There were 134 (78%) patients in the ICBT group with 141 treated lesions and 37 (22%) patients in the control group. There was a high prevalence of hyperlipidemia (>95%), hypertension (>95%), and diabetes (>50%) in both groups. The groups were well-balanced with respect to age, sex, and pre-existing medical conditions, with the exception of previous coronary artery bypass graft being more common the ICBT group. Procedural complication rates were low in the control and ICBT groups (0% vs 4.5%, P = .190). Postprocedural event rates were low (<5%) in both groups. Readmission rate at 30 days was 3.7% in the ICBT group and 5.4% in the control group (P = .649).This is the largest recent known series looking at ICBT for recurrent ISR of DES. ICBT is a safe treatment option with similarly low rates (<5%) of procedural and postprocedural complications compared with percutaneous coronary intervention alone. This study establishes the safety of ICBT in a high-risk patient cohort.

Project description:BackgroundCalcified nodule (CN) is a phenotypic feature of calcified plaques which causes acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent studies reported that culprit lesions harboring CN has been shown to increase a risk of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) or debulking device. Mechanistically, a re-protrusion of CN into the lumen has been considered as an important cause associated with repeat revascularization after PCI. These observations suggest the need for additional therapeutic approach to mitigate a risk of repeat revascularization at CN lesions. Here we report a case who received the implantation of one covered stent due to coronary artery perforation after stent implantation at coronary lesion exhibiting CN. This case is unique in terms of preventing restenosis by using covered stent which could physically hinder protrusion of CN through the stent strut.Case descriptionA 79-year-old man presented to the emergency department with his prolonged chest pain. Although he had a history of hypertension and adrenal hypertrophy, he was not taking any medication prior to his admission. He was diagnosed as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Emergent coronary angiography revealed one severe stenosis in the middle segment of his right coronary artery (RCA). Primary PCI was performed under the guidance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. IVUS imaging prior to PCI revealed a protruding shape of calcification and its irregular surface at his culprit lesion, suggesting the presence of a CN. Following one DES implantation, coronary artery perforation occurred at the segment receiving DES implantation. We implanted one covered stent for the coronary artery perforation. This procedure resulted in successfully sealing coronary artery perforation. Seven months later, follow-up coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging were conducted to evaluate his RCA. Any in-stent restenosis (ISR) was not observed. Furthermore, OCT imaging elucidated a small amount of neointimal proliferation without any re-protruding feature of CN through the segment receiving a covered stent. Of note, he did not experience any clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) for 2 years after PCI.ConclusionsOur case indicates the use of covered stent as an effective approach to physically hinder the re-protrusion of calcification tissues into the lumen, potentially mitigating a risk of ISR.