Dataset Information

Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Outside the Initial Postoperative Period: Does Time from Diagnosis to Surgery Matter?

ABSTRACT: Background Despite an increasing incidence and associated morbidity, the optimal timing for the surgical management of periprosthetic hip fractures remains unknown. This study sought to explore whether time to surgery was associated with medical or surgical complications. Methods A retrospective review of Medicare data from 2010 to 2014 was performed using PearlDiver. All patients with a periprosthetic hip fracture greater than 90 days from surgery and undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) were included. Time to surgery was measured from diagnosis and dichotomized at 48 hours. Results Of 342 patients undergoing ORIF, 269 (79%) had surgery within 48 hours. Of 255 patients undergoing RTHA, 142 (56%) had surgery within 48 hours. For ORIF, surgery more than 48 hours after diagnosis was associated with an increased rate of 30-day deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (15% vs 7%, P = .03), which remained after adjustment (odds ratio [OR]: 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-6.45). A similar association was seen for RTHA (12% vs 6%, P = .09 and OR: 2.61, 95% CI 1.01-7.24). For RTHA, surgery more than 48 hours after diagnosis was associated with an increased rate of 90-day periprosthetic joint infection (12% vs 4%, P = .007), which remained after adjustment (OR: 3.86, 95% CI: 1.36-12.72). A similar but not significant association was seen for ORIF (7% vs 3%, P = .18 and OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 0.73-8.91). Conclusions Among Medicare patients with a periprosthetic hip fracture, time to surgery greater than 48 hours was associated with increased medical and surgical complications.

SUBMITTER: Scott B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7502573 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPrevious evidence has established that early surgery is beneficial to improve outcomes for individuals with native hip fractures in the elderly population. Patients who sustain a periprosthetic fracture have been demonstrated to have similar demographics and outcomes as those with native fractures around the hip and knee. We therefore set out to determine if there is a similar difference in perioperative outcomes between early and delayed surgery for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsLiterature search outputs were screened for studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The groups of early surgery and delayed surgery were defined by study authors. The primary outcome measure was 30 day mortality. Where there was sufficient study homogeneity, a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Individual study risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I criteria, with the GRADE criteria used for independent outcome evaluation. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO prior to commencement (Registration number CRD42019149360).ResultsThe inclusion criteria was met in 11 studies (n = 3006). Mean time to surgery from admission for reporting studies was 64 h. 59.6% patients underwent early surgery as defined by the study authors. We identified a significantly lower risk of 30 day mortality for those with early surgery versus delayed surgery (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05, 0.90; p = 0.04, n = 2022). There were also significantly better outcomes for early versus delayed surgery regarding: medical complications, length of stay, transfusion risk, and reoperation. The quality of evidence for all the individual outcomes was low or very low.ConclusionsThere is evidence that delaying surgery in those with periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee has a deleterious impact on mortality and other important patient outcomes. There are, however, notable limitations to the existing available literature, with further appropriately designed large-scale studies required to confirm these findings.

Project description:ObjectiveThe incidence of hip fractures is increasing worldwide with the aging population, causing a challenge to healthcare systems due to the associated morbidities and high risk of mortality. After hip fractures in frail geriatric patients, existing comorbidities worsen and new complications are prone to occur. Comprehensive rehabilitation is essential for promoting physical function recovery and minimizing complications, which can be achieved through a multidisciplinary approach. Recommendations are required to assist healthcare providers in making decisions on rehabilitation post-surgery. Clinical practice guidelines regarding rehabilitation (physical and occupational therapies) and management of comorbidities/complications in the postoperative phase of hip fractures have not been developed. This guideline aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for various treatment items required for proper recovery after hip fracture surgeries.MethodsReflecting the complex perspectives associated with rehabilitation post-hip surgeries, 15 key questions (KQs) reflecting the complex perspectives associated with post-hip surgery rehabilitation were categorized into four areas: multidisciplinary, rehabilitation, community-care, and comorbidities/complications. Relevant literature from four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was searched for articles published up to February 2020. The evidence level and recommended grade were determined according to the grade of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation method.ResultsA multidisciplinary approach, progressive resistance exercises, and balance training are strongly recommended. Early ambulation, weigh-bearing exercises, activities of daily living training, community-level rehabilitation, management of comorbidities/complication prevention, and nutritional support were also suggested. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the total healthcare cost.ConclusionThis guideline presents comprehensive recommendations for the rehabilitation of adult patients after hip fracture surgery.

Project description:IntroductionIncreasing numbers of patients with hip fractures also have advanced comorbidities. A majority are treated surgically. However, a significantly increasing percentage of medically unfit patients with unacceptably high risk of perioperative death are treated nonoperatively. Important questions about patients' prefracture quality of life (QOL) and future perspectives should be asked before considering different treatment options to assess what kind of treatment is advisable in frail elderly high-risk patients with a hip fracture.ObjectiveThe aim of this review was to provide an overview of differences in mortality, health-related QOL [(HR)QOL], functional outcome, and costs between nonoperative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) of hip fractures in patients above 65 years.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in EMBASE, OvidSP, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science for observational studies and trials. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing NOM with OM in hip fracture patients were selected. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed according to the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) or Furlan checklist.ResultsSeven observational studies were included with a total of 1189 patients, of whom 242 (20.3%) were treated conservatively. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate (mean: 14.7, standard deviation [SD]: 1.5). The 30-day and 1-year mortalities were higher in the nonoperative group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-10.96; OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.57-9.41). None of the included studies compared QOL, functional outcome, or health-care costs between the 2 groups.ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that only a few studies with small number of patients comparing NOM with OM were published. A significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality was revealed in nonoperatively treated hip fracture patients. No data were found examining (HR)QOL and costs. Further work is needed to enable shared decision-making and to initiate NOM in frail elderly patients with advanced comorbidity and limited life expectancy.

Dataset Information

Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Outside the Initial Postoperative Period: Does Time from Diagnosis to Surgery Matter?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets