Dataset Information

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA).

ABSTRACT: This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups-the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor's frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue.

SUBMITTER: Choi KH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7504159 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA).

Choi Kyeong-Hee KH Cho Min-Uk MU Park Chae-Won CW Kim Seoung-Yeon SY Kim Min-Jung MJ Hong Boram B Kong Yong-Ku YK

International journal of environmental research and public health 20200831 17

This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups-the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 ...[more]

PMID: 32878184

Similar Datasets

Project description:Spinal manipulation (SM) is used commonly for treating low back pain (LBP). Spinal stiffness is routinely assessed by clinicians performing SM. Flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) was shown to distinguish between LBP and healthy populations. The primary objective of this study was to examine the association of these two physiological variables with patient-reported pain intensity and disability in adults with chronic LBP (>12 weeks) receiving SM.A single-arm trial provided 12 sessions of side-lying thrust SM in the lumbosacral region over 6 weeks. Inclusion criteria included 21-65 years old, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score ? 6 and numerical pain rating score ? 2. Spinal stiffness and FRR were assessed pre-treatment at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 6 weeks of treatment. Lumbar spine global stiffness (GS) were calculated from the force-displacement curves obtained using i) hand palpation, ii) a hand-held device, and iii) an automated indenter device. Lumbar FRR was assessed during trunk flexion-extension using surface electromyography. The primary outcomes were RMDQ and pain intensity measured by visual analog scale (VAS). Mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze the data.The mean age of the 82 participants was 45 years; 48% were female; and 84% reported LBP >1 year. The mean (standard deviation) baseline pain intensity and RMDQ were 46.1 (18.1) and 9.5 (4.3), respectively. The mean reduction (95% confidence interval) after 6 weeks in pain intensity and RMDQ were 20.1 mm (14.1 to 26.1) and 4.8 (3.7 to 5.8). There was a small change over time in the palpatory GS but not in the hand-held or automated GS, nor in FRR. The addition of each physiologic variable did not affect the model-estimated changes in VAS or RMDQ over time. There was no association seen between physiological variables and LBP intensity. Higher levels of hand-held GS at L3 and automated GS were significantly associated with higher levels of RMDQ (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively) and lower levels of flexion and extension FRR were significantly associated with higher levels of RMDQ (p = 0.02 and 0.008, respectively) across the 3 assessment time points.Improvement in pain and disability observed in study participants with chronic LBP was not associated with the measured GS or FRR.NCT01670292 on clinicaltrials.gov, August 2, 2012.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the biomechanics of simulated posterior cruciate ligament injuries (SimPCL) with and without internal brace suture tape augmentation (IBSTA) in cadaver knees.MethodsA total of 20 cadaveric knees were used, all male, with an average age of 65 ± 18 years. Femoral tunnel isometry was evaluated at the 1/11 o'clock and 2/10 o'clock femoral positions. SimPCL were created in 6 knees. IBSTA was performed, and load data were collected through knee range of motion. An additional 6 specimens were evaluated at the 1/11 femoral tunnel position, and load cell recordings were obtained at 10 different knee flexion angles. Cyclic displacement in 8 cadaver knees was assessed using an Instron machine. Load and displacement data were recorded. Testing was performed under 3 conditions for each specimen: intact PCL, SimPCL, and SimPCL/IBSTA using the 1/11 femoral tunnel position.ResultsThere was no difference in isometry when comparing the 1/11 o'clock (7.1 ± 4.0 ft∗lb) femoral position and the 2/10 o'clock (7.6 ± 4.2 ft∗lb) position (P = .467). SimPCL/IBSTA suture tape tension gradually increased with progressive flexion to a peak at approximately 120° of knee flexion. For cycle 100 tibial displacement, there was no difference between intact (4.41 mm) and SimPCL/IBSTA (5.59 mm, P = .391). There was a difference between intact (4.41 mm) and SimPCL (7.19 mm, P = .006) , but there was no significant difference between SimPCL/IBSTA (5.59 mm) and SimPCL (7.19 mm, P = .140). There was a difference in cycle 1 stiffness between intact (62.3 N/mm) and Sim2PCL (37 N/mm, P = .005). There was no difference between other groups.ConclusionsIn this cadaver study, there was a 1.18-mm average difference in posterior tibial displacement when comparing intact and SimPCL/IBSTA. The internal brace construct should be tensioned and fixed at approximately 100° of knee flexion to prevent loss of full flexion.Clinical relevanceThe presented biomechanical data for internal bracing of PCL injuries may lead to improved surgical techniques.

Dataset Information

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA).

Publications

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets