Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
RET fusions are oncogenic drivers in 1 to 2% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibition are unknown.Methods
We enrolled patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated separately in a phase 1-2 trial of selpercatinib. The primary end point was an objective response (a complete or partial response) as determined by an independent review committee. Secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety.Results
In the first 105 consecutively enrolled patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received at least platinum-based chemotherapy, the percentage with an objective response was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 73). The median duration of response was 17.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to could not be evaluated), and 63% of the responses were ongoing at a median follow-up of 12.1 months. Among 39 previously untreated patients, the percentage with an objective response was 85% (95% CI, 70 to 94), and 90% of the responses were ongoing at 6 months. Among 11 patients with measurable central nervous system metastasis at enrollment, the percentage with an objective intracranial response was 91% (95% CI, 59 to 100). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were hypertension (in 14% of the patients), an increased alanine aminotransferase level (in 12%), an increased aspartate aminotransferase level (in 10%), hyponatremia (in 6%), and lymphopenia (in 6%). A total of 12 of 531 patients (2%) discontinued selpercatinib because of a drug-related adverse event.Conclusions
Selpercatinib had durable efficacy, including intracranial activity, with mainly low-grade toxic effects in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated. (Funded by Loxo Oncology and others; LIBRETTO-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03157128.).
SUBMITTER: Drilon A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7506467 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Drilon Alexander A Oxnard Geoffrey R GR Tan Daniel S W DSW Loong Herbert H F HHF Johnson Melissa M Gainor Justin J McCoach Caroline E CE Gautschi Oliver O Besse Benjamin B Cho Byoung C BC Peled Nir N Weiss Jared J Kim Yu-Jung YJ Ohe Yuichiro Y Nishio Makoto M Park Keunchil K Patel Jyoti J Seto Takashi T Sakamoto Tomohiro T Rosen Ezra E Shah Manisha H MH Barlesi Fabrice F Cassier Philippe A PA Bazhenova Lyudmila L De Braud Filippo F Garralda Elena E Velcheti Vamsidhar V Satouchi Miyako M Ohashi Kadoaki K Pennell Nathan A NA Reckamp Karen L KL Dy Grace K GK Wolf Jürgen J Solomon Benjamin B Falchook Gerald G Ebata Kevin K Nguyen Michele M Nair Binoj B Zhu Edward Y EY Yang Luxi L Huang Xin X Olek Elizabeth E Rothenberg S Michael SM Goto Koichi K Subbiah Vivek V
The New England journal of medicine 20200801 9
<h4>Background</h4><i>RET</i> fusions are oncogenic drivers in 1 to 2% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In patients with <i>RET</i> fusion-positive NSCLC, the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibition are unknown.<h4>Methods</h4>We enrolled patients with advanced <i>RET</i> fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated separately in a phase 1-2 trial of selpercatinib. The primary end point was an objective resp ...[more]