Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Individual Baseline Performance and Electrode Montage Impact on the Effects of Anodal tDCS Over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.


ABSTRACT: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC), can produce significant effects on working memory (WM) performance and associated neurophysiological activity. However, results from previous studies are inconsistent and occasionally contradictory. This inconsistency may be attributed to methodological and individual differences during experiments. This study therefore investigated two hypotheses: (1) A multichannel-optimized montage was expected to be more effective than a classical bipolar montage, because of increased focality. (2) The subjects were expected to benefit differently from the stimulation depending on their initial task performance. In a sham-controlled crossover study, 24 healthy participants received bipolar, multichannel, and sham stimulation for 20 min in randomized order, targeting the lDLPFC while performing a 2-back WM task. After stimulation, electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at rest and during 2-back and nontarget continuous performance task (CPT) performance. Bipolar and multichannel stimulations were both well tolerated and effectively blinded. We found no effect of stimulation on behavioral performance or neuronal oscillations comparing the classical bipolar or multichannel montage with sham stimulation. We did, however, find an interaction between stimulation and initial task performance. For multichannel stimulation, initially low-performing participants tended to improve their WM performance while initially high-performing participants tended to worsen their performance compared to sham stimulation. Both tDCS montages induced changes in neural oscillatory power, which correlated with baseline performance. The worse the participants' initial WM performance was, the more task-related theta power was induced by multichannel and bipolar stimulation. The same effect was observed for alpha power in the nontarget task following multichannel stimulation. Notably, we were not able to show a superiority of multichannel stimulation compared to bipolar stimulation. Still, comparing both montages with sham stimulation, multichannel stimulation led to stronger effects than bipolar stimulation. The current study highlights the importance of investigating different parameters with potential influence on tDCS effects in combination. Our results demonstrate how individual differences in cognitive performance and electrode montages influence effects of tDCS on neuropsychological performance. These findings support the idea of an individualized and optimized stimulation setting, potentially leading to increased tDCS effects.

SUBMITTER: Splittgerber M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7506510 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Individual Baseline Performance and Electrode Montage Impact on the Effects of Anodal tDCS Over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Splittgerber Maike M   Salvador Ricardo R   Brauer Hannah H   Breitling-Ziegler Carolin C   Prehn-Kristensen Alexander A   Krauel Kerstin K   Nowak Rafal R   Ruffini Giulio G   Moliadze Vera V   Siniatchkin Michael M  

Frontiers in human neuroscience 20200908


Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC), can produce significant effects on working memory (WM) performance and associated neurophysiological activity. However, results from previous studies are inconsistent and occasionally contradictory. This inconsistency may be attributed to methodological and individual differences during experiments. This study therefore investigated two hypotheses: (1) A multichannel-optimized mo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8563927 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5110534 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8571084 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7221177 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10837991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10530485 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5427889 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6521735 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9257135 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9929296 | biostudies-literature