Dataset Information

Predicting Advanced Balance Ability and Mobility with an Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test.

ABSTRACT: Extensive test batteries are often needed to obtain a comprehensive picture of a person's functional status. Many test batteries are not suitable for active and healthy adults due to ceiling effects, or require a lot of space, time, and training. The Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS) is considered a gold standard for this population, but the test is complex, as well as time- and resource intensive. There is a strong need for a faster, yet sensitive and robust test of physical function in seniors. We sought to investigate whether an instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) could predict the CBMS score in 60 outpatients and healthy community-dwelling seniors, where features of the iTUG were predictive, and how the prediction of CBMS with the iTUG compared to standard clinical tests. A partial least squares regression analysis was used to identify latent components explaining variation in CBMS total score. The model with iTUG features was able to predict the CBMS total score with an accuracy of 85.2% (84.9-85.5%), while standard clinical tests predicted 82.5% (82.2-82.8%) of the score. These findings suggest that a fast and easily administered iTUG could be used to predict CBMS score, providing a valuable tool for research and clinical care.

SUBMITTER: Bergquist R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7506906 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predicting Advanced Balance Ability and Mobility with an Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test.

Bergquist Ronny R Nerz Corinna C Taraldsen Kristin K Mellone Sabato S Ihlen Espen A F EAF Vereijken Beatrix B Helbostad Jorunn L JL Becker Clemens C Mikolaizak A Stefanie AS

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20200903 17

Extensive test batteries are often needed to obtain a comprehensive picture of a person's functional status. Many test batteries are not suitable for active and healthy adults due to ceiling effects, or require a lot of space, time, and training. The Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS) is considered a gold standard for this population, but the test is complex, as well as time- and resource intensive. There is a strong need for a faster, yet sensitive and robust test of physical function ...[more]

PMID: 32899143

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBalance assessment is now recommended by clinical practice guidelines, specific tests have yet to be suggested. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a simple measure of balance status and functional mobility. Nowadays, we need more data of an optimum cut off point of TUG time for detecting balance impairment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability relative to balance impairment of the TUG in subjects with COPD.MethodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted in stable COPD patient at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand from November 2015 to October 2017. Balance impairment test was measured using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a score of ?45 indicates balance impairment. The TUG was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR?), Youden’s index, and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) from various points of TUG to identify the optimum cut-off point for detecting balance impairment. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify the optimum cut off point of TUG test time for prediction of balance impairment in COPD.ResultsOne hundred and eighteen smoking related COPD subjects 86 (72.9% male) with a mean age of 73.5±8.1 years were included in this study. Univariable analysis showed that the AUROC of TUG test to indicate those who had impaired balance was 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88, 0.98]. A cut off point of TUG test time ?12 seconds had sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR?, Youden’s index, and AUROC of 95.8%, 90.4%, 10.01, 0.05, 86.2, and 0.93 for detecting balance impairment, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified the TUG test time ?12 seconds was the best predictor of balance impairment in COPD patients with adjusted risk ratio (RR) of 25.2 (95% CI: 1.6, 312.0, P=0.021) and, the AUROC was 0.98 (95% CI; 0.96, 1.00).ConclusionsOur study indicates the TUG test time ?12 seconds has a high diagnostic ability for balance impairment prediction in COPD. The result supports a potential role for this simple test to be incorporated into routine COPD assessment to stratify patients’ balance.

Project description:Background:Simple, easy-to-perform, safe and cost-effective methods for the prediction of adverse outcomes in older adults are essential for the identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from early preventive interventions. Methods:The study included 160 community-dwelling individuals aged 60-74 years, with 44.4% women. A comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed in all participants. Bioimpedance body composition analysis included 149 subjects. Among other tests, functional assessment included the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (Barthel Index), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Fried frailty phenotype. Follow-up by telephone was made after at least 365 days. The composite endpoint (CE) included fall, hospitalization, institutionalization and death. Results:Cohort characteristics: age 66.8±4.2 years (mean±SD), 3.81±2.23 diseases, 4.29±3.60 medications or supplements, and good functional status (MMSE 29.0±1.5, Barthel Index 98.1±8.2, prevalence of Fried frailty phenotype 2.5%). During one-year follow-up, 34 subjects (21.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] =14.9-27.6%) experienced CE: hospitalizations (13.8%; 95% CI=8.41-19.1), falls (9.38%; 95% CI=4.86-13.9), death (0.63%; 95% CI=0-1.85) and no institutionalization. A higher probability of CE was associated with age ?70 years (P=0.018), taking any medication or supplements (P=0.007), usual pace gait speed ?0.8 m/s (P=0.028) and TUG >9 s (P<0.002). TUG was the only independent measure predicting one-year CE occurrence (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.07-1.40, P=0.003) in multivariate logistic regression. However, its predictive power was poor; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.659 (95% CI 0.551-0.766, P=0.004) and Youden's J statistic for a TUG cut-off of 9.0 s was 0.261 (sensitivity 0.618 and specificity 0.643). Conclusion:The TUG test was superior to frailty phenotype measures in predicting one-year incidence of a CE consisting of fall, hospitalization, institutionalization and death in a cohort of healthy-aging community-dwelling early-old adults, although its value as a stand-alone test was limited.

Dataset Information

Predicting Advanced Balance Ability and Mobility with an Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test.

Publications

Predicting Advanced Balance Ability and Mobility with an Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure