Dataset Information

Activity of Cefiderocol, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Eravacycline against Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from the United States and International Sites in Relation to Clonal Background, Resistance Genes, Coresistance, and Region.

ABSTRACT: Emerging carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli, including sequence type 131 (ST131), the leading cause of extraintestinal E. coli infections globally, threatens therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, we determined broth microdilution MICs for three distinctive newer agents, i.e., cefiderocol (CFDC), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and eravacycline (ERV), plus 11 comparators, against 343 carbapenem-resistant (CR) clinical E. coli isolates, then compared susceptibility results with bacterial characteristics and region. The collection comprised 203 U.S. isolates (2002 to 2017) and 141 isolates from 17 countries in Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-West Pacific region (2003 to 2017). Isolates were characterized for phylogenetic group, resistance-associated sequence types (STs) and subsets thereof, and relevant beta-lactamase-encoding genes. CFDC, CZA, and ERV exhibited the highest percent susceptible (82% to 98%) after tigecycline (TGC) (99%); avibactam improved CZA's activity over that of CAZ (11% susceptible). Percent susceptible varied by phylogroup and ST for CFDC and CZA (greatest in phylogroups B2, D, and F, and in ST131, ST405, and ST648). Susceptibility also varied by resistance genotype, being higher with the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) for CZA, lower with metallo-beta-lactamases for CFDC and CZA, and higher with the beta-lactamase CTX-M for ERV. Percent susceptible also varied by global region for CZA (lower in Asia-Pacific) and by U.S. region for ERV (lower in the South and Southeast). Although resistance to comparators often predicted reduced susceptibility to a primary agent (especially CFDC and CZA), even among comparator-resistant isolates the primary-agent-susceptible fraction usually exceeded 50%. These findings clarify the likely utility of CFDC, CZA, and ERV against CR E. coli in relation to multiple bacterial characteristics and geographical region.

SUBMITTER: Johnston BD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7508590 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Activity of Cefiderocol, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Eravacycline against Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from the United States and International Sites in Relation to Clonal Background, Resistance Genes, Coresistance, and Region.

Johnston Brian D BD Thuras Paul P Porter Stephen B SB Anacker Melissa M VonBank Brittany B Snippes Vagnone Paula P Witwer Medora M Castanheira Mariana M Johnson James R JR

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20200921 10

Emerging carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli, including sequence type 131 (ST131), the leading cause of extraintestinal E. coli infections globally, threatens therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, we determined broth microdilution MICs for three distinctive newer agents, i.e., cefiderocol (CFDC), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and eravacycline (ERV), plus 11 comparators, against 343 carbapenem-resistant (CR) clinical E. coli isolates, then compared susceptibility results wi ...[more]

PMID: 32718965

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: To systematically review and compare the efficacy and posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with Gram-negative pathogens. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases were searched from their inception up to March 31, 2021, to obtain studies on ceftazidime-avibactam therapy versus ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The primary outcome was mortality rate, and the second outcomes were microbiologically negative, clinical success, and the development of resistance after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Results: Seventeen studies representing 1,435 patients (837 received ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and 598 received ceftazidime-avibactam therapy) were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that no statistically significant difference was found on mortality rate (Petos odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.34), microbiologically negative (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.54-1.81), and clinical success (OR =0.95, 95% CI 0.64-1.39) between ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam therapy. Although there was no difference in posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.34-1.26) in all included studies, a trend favoring the combination therapy was found (according to the pooled three studies, OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.78). Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy may not have beneficial effects on mortality, microbiologically negative, and clinical success to patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A trend of posttreatment resistance occurred more likely in ceftazidime-avibactam therapy than the combination therapy. Due to the limited number of studies that can be included, additional high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.

Project description:Background:The efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam-a cephalosporin-?-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-compared with colistin remains unknown. Methods:Patients initially treated with either ceftazidime-avibactam or colistin for CRE infections were selected from the Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacteriaceae (CRACKLE), a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Efficacy, safety, and benefit-risk analyses were performed using intent-to-treat analyses with partial credit and the desirability of outcome ranking approaches. The ordinal efficacy outcome was based on disposition at day 30 after starting treatment (home vs not home but not observed to die in the hospital vs hospital death). All analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results:Thirty-eight patients were treated first with ceftazidime-avibactam and 99 with colistin. Most patients received additional anti-CRE agents as part of their treatment. Bloodstream (n = 63; 46%) and respiratory (n = 30; 22%) infections were most common. In patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin, IPTW-adjusted all-cause hospital mortality 30 days after starting treatment was 9% versus 32%, respectively (difference, 23%; 95% bootstrap confidence interval, 9%-35%; P = .001). In an analysis of disposition at 30 days, patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, compared with those treated within colistin, had an IPTW-adjusted probability of a better outcome of 64% (95% confidence interval, 57%-71%). Partial credit analyses indicated uniform superiority of ceftazidime-avibactam to colistin. Conclusions:Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a reasonable alternative to colistin in the treatment of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing CRE infections. These findings require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.

Dataset Information

Activity of Cefiderocol, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Eravacycline against Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from the United States and International Sites in Relation to Clonal Background, Resistance Genes, Coresistance, and Region.

Publications

Activity of Cefiderocol, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Eravacycline against Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from the United States and International Sites in Relation to Clonal Background, Resistance Genes, Coresistance, and Region.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets