Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How does per-oral endoscopic myotomy compare to Heller myotomy? The Latin American perspective.


ABSTRACT: Background and study aims ?Both Heller myotomy (HM) and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are efficacious therapies for achalasia. The efficacy and safety of POEM vs HM in Latin America and specifically in patients with Chagas disease is unknown. Patients and methods ?Consecutive patients undergoing either HM or POEM for achalasia were included from nine Latin American centers in a prospective registry over 5 years. Technical success was defined as undergoing a successful myotomy. Clinical success was defined as achieving an Eckardt score

SUBMITTER: Kahaleh M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7508649 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<b>Background and study aims</b>  Both Heller myotomy (HM) and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are efficacious therapies for achalasia. The efficacy and safety of POEM vs HM in Latin America and specifically in patients with Chagas disease is unknown. <b>Patients and methods</b>  Consecutive patients undergoing either HM or POEM for achalasia were included from nine Latin American centers in a prospective registry over 5 years. Technical success was defined as undergoing a successful myotomy.  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6492919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11362179 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8690962 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6470349 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5990344 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8184417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8589564 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8159581 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8671003 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4683141 | biostudies-other