Dataset Information

A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Since the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), no prospective study has investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (SIB-IMRT with 60?Gy) remains superior to radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) alone for unresectable esophageal cancer (EC). Furthermore, the optimal therapeutic regimen for patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemoradiotherapy is unclear. We recently completed a phase I/II radiation dose-escalation trial using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), elective nodal irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable EC. We now intend to conduct a prospective, phase III, randomized study of SIB-IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We aim to find a safe, practical, and effective therapeutic regimen to replace the conventional segmentation (1.8-2.0?Gy) treatment mode (radiotherapy ± chemotherapy) for unresectable EC. METHODS:This two-arm, open, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial will recruit esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (stage IIA-IVB [UICC 2002]; IVB only with metastasis to the supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes). In all, 164 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio, and stratified by study site and disease stage, especially the extent of lymph node metastasis. Patients in the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95% planning target volume/planning gross tumor volume, 50.4?Gy/59.92?Gy/28 f, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions?=?60.62?Gy). Patients in the SIB?+?concurrent chemotherapy arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and a platinum-based drug (5-6?weeks). Four cycles of consolidated chemoradiotherapy will also be recommended. The primary objective is to compare the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival of the SIB?+?chemotherapy group and SIB groups. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, local recurrence-free rate, completion rate, and adverse events. Detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality-assurance procedures have been incorporated into this trial. DISCUSSION:In unresectable, locally advanced EC, a safe and effective total radiotherapy dose and reasonable segmentation doses are required for the clinical application of SIB-IMRT + two-drug chemotherapy. Whether this protocol will replace the standard treatment regimen will be prospectively investigated. The effects of SIB-IMRT in patients with poor physical condition who cannot tolerate definitive chemoradiotherapy will also be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION:clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03308552 , November 1, 2017).

SUBMITTER: Gao LR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7510301 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol.

Gao Lin-Rui LR Wang Xin X Han Weiming W Deng Wei W Li Chen C Wang Xiaomin X Zhao Yidian Y Ni Wenjie W Chang Xiao X Zhou Zongmei Z Deng Lei L Wang Wenqing W Liu Wenyang W Liang Jun J Zhang Tao T Bi Nan N Wang Jianyang J Zhai Yirui Y Feng Qinfu Q Lv Jima J Li Ling L Xiao Zefen Z

BMC cancer 20200922 1

<h4>Background</h4>Since the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), no prospective study has investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (SIB-IMRT with 60 Gy) remains superior to radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) alone for unresectable esophageal cancer (EC). Furthermore, the optimal therapeutic regimen for patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemoradiotherapy is unclear. We recently completed a phase I/II radiation dose-escalation tr ...[more]

PMID: 32962674

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) versus standard-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SD-IMRT) in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.MethodsFrom July 2003 to March 2014, 1748 patients in a single center who received definitive chemoradiotherapy were included in the analysis. A total of 109 patients who underwent SIB-IMRT and fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified as the study group. A total of 266 patients who underwent SD-IMRT (60 Gy/30 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 1 time/day, 5 times/week) during the same period were selected as the control group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Survival status, treatment failure mode, and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were more women and more cervical and upper thoracic cancers (P = 0.038, < 0.001, respectively) in the SIB-IMRT group before case matching. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the SD-IMRT and SIB-IMRT groups was 22 and 19 months, respectively, and the median overall survival duration was 24 and 22 months, respectively, with χ2 = 0.244 and P = 0.621. After PSM of 1:1, 138 patients entered the final analysis (69 cases from each group). The median PFS of the SD-IMRT group and the SIB-IMRT group was 13 and 18 months, respectively, with χ2 = 8.776 and P = 0.003. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year overall survival rates were 66.7, 21.7, and 8.7% and 65.2, 36.2, and 27.3%, respectively, and the median overall survival duration was 16 and 22 months, respectively, with χ2 = 5.362 and P = 0.021. Treatment failure mode: 5‑year local regional recurrence rates of SD-IMRT and SIB-IMRT were 50.7 and 36.2%, respectively, with χ2 = 2.949 and P = 0.086. The 5‑year distant metastasis rates of the two groups were 36.2 and 24.6%, respectively, with χ2 = 2.190 and P = 0.139.Adverse events3 patients experienced grade 4-5 toxicity (2.2%), including one case of grade 4 radiation esophagitis and two cases of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis, all in the SD-IMRT group; 14 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events (10.1%), primarily including radiation esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, and hematological toxicity.ConclusionThe technique of SIB-IMRT was safe and reliable compared with SD-IMRT. In addition, SIB-IMRT had locoregional control advantages and potential survival benefits.

Project description:BackgroundThe literature regarding esophageal fistula after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains lacking. We aimed to investigate the risk factors of esophageal fistula among ESCC patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) via IMRT technique.MethodsA total of 129 consecutive ESCC patients receiving definitive CCRT with IMRT between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. The cumulative incidence of esophageal fistula and survival of patients were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by the log-rank test. The risk factors of esophageal fistula were determined with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.ResultsMedian follow-up was 14.9 months (IQR, 7.0-28.8). Esophageal perforation was identified in 20 (15.5%) patients, resulting in esophago-pleural fistula in nine, esophago-tracheal fistula in seven, broncho-esophageal fistula in two, and aorto-esophageal fistula in two patients. The median interval from IMRT to the occurrence of esophageal fistula was 4.4 months (IQR, 3.3-10.1). Patients with esophageal fistula had an inferior median overall survival (10.0 vs. 17.2 months, p = 0.0096). T4 (HR, 3.776; 95% CI, 1.383-10.308; p = 0.010) and esophageal stenosis (HR, 2.601; 95% CI, 1.053-6.428; p = 0.038) at baseline were the independent risk factors for esophageal fistula. The cumulative incidence of esophageal fistula was higher in patients with T4 (p = 0.018) and pre-treatment esophageal stenosis (p = 0.045). There was a trend toward better survival after esophageal fistula among patients receiving repair or stenting for the fistula than those only undergoing conservative treatments (median survival, 5.9 vs. 0.9 months, p = 0.058).ConclusionsT4 and esophageal stenosis at baseline independently increased the risk of esophageal fistula in ESCC treated by definitive CCRT with IMRT. There existed a trend toward improved survival after the fistula among patients receiving repair or stenting for esophageal perforation.

Project description:BackgroundThe literature regarding pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer was lacking. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT.MethodsA total of 126 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. The pericardial effusion was determined on computed tomography scan of the chest and graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by the log-rank test. The risk factors of pericardial effusion were determined with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 14.0 months. Thirty-seven (29.4%) patients had pericardial effusion after a median interval of 6.6 months since the end of IMRT. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion of any grade was higher in patients with mean heart dose > 23.45 Gy (p = 0.00018), heart V30 > 33.55% (p = 0.00015), mean pericardium dose > 20.33 Gy (p = 0.00027), and pericardium V20 > 42.55% (p = 0.00018). Furthermore, eight (6.3%) patients had symptoms related to pericardial effusion and were considered as cases with pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3 was higher in patients with pericardium V30 > 65.80% (p = 0.00028), V40 > 55.35% (p < 0.0001), and V60 > 24.70% (p = 0.0021). Multivariate analyses showed the above dose-volume parameters predicted the risk of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer.ConclusionsDose-volume parameters predicting the risk of pericardial effusion were identified in esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT. They could be applied as constraints of IMRT for esophageal cancer.

Dataset Information

A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol.

Publications

A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets