Dataset Information

Management of Bivalirudin Anticoagulation Therapy for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and a Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide respiratory and cardiac support to patients in reversible devastated conditions. Heparin is the mainstay for anticoagulation during ECMO. Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin blocker, may represent an effective alternative for patients suffering from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We present the first case of a Chinese patient who experienced HIT and received bivalirudin anticoagulation during ECMO. In addition, we present a systematic review for this topic. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (up to April 20, 2020) for studies that included patients undergoing ECMO, presenting with HIT, requiring bivalirudin treatment, and reporting relevant outcomes. The literature review yielded 15 studies involving 123 patients, amongst whom 58 patients were confirmed or suspected HIT patients, and 76 patients received bivalirudin as an anticoagulant for ECMO. Twelve studies were included for quantitative synthesis, and 46 patients were retrieved. The mean age of these patients was 46 years, and 30 patients were males. The average maintenance rate of bivalirudin was 0.27 ± 0.37 mg/kg/h, in order to maintain a target of activated clotting time (ACT) of 160-220 s. Additionally, bivalirudin doses in patients with continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) and patients without CRRT were 0.15 ± 0.06 mg/kg/h vs 0.28 ± 0.36 mg/kg/h, respectively (p=0.15). Most of the patients with confirmed HIT improved platelet counts in 3.3 ± 2.8 days after switching to bivalirudin anticoagulation. The patient-level data showed that 29 cases survived, 1 reported major bleeding, and 4 reported thrombotic events. Bivalirudin might be a promising optimal choice for ECMO anticoagulation in patients with HIT. A tailored protocol for management of bivalirudin treatment during ECMO should be developed with caution. Further prospective studies are necessary to standardise the use of bivalirudin. Systematic Review Registration:PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020160907.

SUBMITTER: Zhong H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7516194 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Management of Bivalirudin Anticoagulation Therapy for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and a Systematic Review.

Zhong Han H Zhu Ming-Li ML Yu Yue-Tian YT Li Wen W Xing Shun-Peng SP Zhao Xian-Yuan XY Wang Wei-Jun WJ Gu Zhi-Chun ZC Gao Yuan Y

Frontiers in pharmacology 20200911

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide respiratory and cardiac support to patients in reversible devastated conditions. Heparin is the mainstay for anticoagulation during ECMO. Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin blocker, may represent an effective alternative for patients suffering from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We present the first case of a Chinese patient who experienced HIT and received bivalirudin anticoagulation during ECMO. In addition, we present a systematic re ...[more]

PMID: 33013402

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).MethodsWe conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the anticoagulant for ECMO. Efficacy outcomes were defined as the time to reach therapeutic levels, time within therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, circuit thrombosis, circuit exchanges. Safety outcomes were reported as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), major bleeding events, minor bleeding events. Other outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mortality, 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality.ResultsTen studies with 1091 patients were included for meta-analysis. A significant reduction in thrombotic events [OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36,0.73, p = 0.0002, I2 = 0%], major bleeding events [OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10,0.92, p = 0.04, I2 = 75%] and in-hospital mortality [OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.44,0.89, p = 0.009, I2 = 0%] treated with bivalirudin were found compared with heparin. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the time to reach therapeutic levels [MD 3.53, 95%CI -4.02,11.09, p = 0.36, I2 = 49%], TTR [MD 8.64, 95%CI -1.72,18.65, p = 0.10, I2 = 77%], circuit exchanges [OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.27,3.12, p = 0.90, I2 = 38%], HIT [OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.02,2.52, p = 0.24, I2 = 0%], minor bleeding events [OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38,2.29, p = 0.87, I2 = 0%], hospital LOS [MD -2.93, 95%CI -9.01,3.15, p = 0.34, I2 = 45%], ICU LOS [MD -4.22, 95%CI -10.07,1.62, p = 0.16, I2 = 0%], mortality [OR 1.84, 95%CI 0.58,5.85, p = 0.30, I2 = 60%] and 30-day mortality [OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.38,1.48, p = 0.41, I2 = 0%].ConclusionBivalirudin probably be a potential choice for ECMO anticoagulation. However, based on the included studies' limitation, the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin for anticoagulation in the ECMO population still require further prospective randomized controlled studies before a definite conclusion.

Project description:Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a potentially life-saving intervention in refractory cardiopulmonary failure, but it requires anticoagulation to prevent circuit thromboses, which exposes the patient to hemorrhagic complications. Heparin has traditionally been the anticoagulant of choice, but the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin is routinely used in cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and has been suggested as a superior choice. We sought to examine the timing of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation and to compare the rates of such complications between patients anticoagulated with heparin versus bivalirudin.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingJohns Hopkins Hospital patients between January 2016 and July 2019.PatientsAdult (> 18 yr) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.InterventionsPatients were anticoagulated either with heparin or bivalirudin.Measurements and main resultsWe compared rates of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications by time on heparin versus bivalirudin and characterized the average time to each complication. Of 144 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients (mean age 55.3 yr; 58% male), 41% were on central venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 40% on peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 19% on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Thirteen patients (9%) received bivalirudin during their extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run, due to concern for (n = 8) or diagnosis of (n = 4) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or for heparin resistance (n = 1). The rate of hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications did not differ between heparin (0.13/d) and bivalirudin (0.06/d; p = 0.633), but patients on bivalirudin received significantly fewer blood transfusions (1.0 U of RBCs/d vs 2.9/d on heparin; p < 0.001).ConclusionsOur results confirm the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and suggest a potential benefit in less blood product transfusion, although prospective studies are needed to evaluate the true effect of bivalirudin versus the disease processes that prompted its use in our study population.

Project description:Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious, immune-mediated adverse drug reaction to unfractionated heparin (UFH) affecting also patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Although the association between VA-ECMO support and the development of thrombocytopenia has long been known and discussed, HIT as one underlying cause is still insufficiently understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to further investigate the epidemiology, mortality, diagnosis, and clinical management of HIT occurring in VA-ECMO patients treated with UFH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including adult patients (≥18 years) with VA-ECMO support in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital of Munich (LMU) between January 2013 and May 2022, excluding patients with a known history of HIT upon admission. Differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcome between excluded HIT (positive anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibody test but negative functional assay) and confirmed HIT (positive anti-PF4/heparin antibody test and positive functional assay) VA-ECMO patients as well as diagnosis and clinical management of HIT were analysed. Results: Among the 373 patients included, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were detected in 53/373 (14.2%) patients. Functional HIT testing confirmed HIT in 13 cases (3.5%) and excluded HIT in 40 cases (10.7%), corresponding to a prevalence of confirmed HIT of 13/373 (3.5%) [1.6, 5.3] and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 24.5% for the antibody screening test. The platelet course including platelet recovery following argatroban initiation was similar between all groups. One-month mortality in patients with excluded HIT was 14/40 (35%) and 3-month mortality 17/40 (43%), compared to 5/13 (38%) (p > 0.999), and 6/13 (46%) (p > 0.999) in patients with confirmed HIT. Neurological outcome in both groups measured by the cerebral performance category of survivors on hospital discharge was similar, as well as adverse events during VA-ECMO therapy. Conclusions: With a prevalence of 3.5%, HIT is a non-frequent complication in patients on VA-ECMO and was not associated with a higher mortality rate. HIT was ultimately excluded by functional essay in 75% of VA-ECMO patients with clinical suspicion of HIT and positive anti-PF4/heparin antibody test. Argatroban seems to be an appropriate and safe therapeutic option for confirmed HIT-positive patients on VA-ECMO support.

Project description:Background: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) that can be an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH). The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in anticoagulation therapy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain unknown. Methods: This study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library databases to identify all relevant original studies estimating bivalirudin's efficacy and safety versus UFH as anticoagulation therapy in ECMO. The time limit for searching is from the search beginning to June 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The meta-analysis (CRD42020214713) was performed via the RevMan version 5.3.5 Software and STATA version 15.1 Software. Results: Ten articles with 847 patients were included for the quantitative analysis. Bivalirudin can significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding in children (I 2 = 48%, p = 0.01, odd ratio (OR) = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.66), patient thrombosis (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.02, OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.93), in-circuit thrombosis/interventions (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.0005, OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.68), and in-hospital mortality (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.007, OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Also, comparable clinical outcomes were observed in the incidence of major bleeding in adults (I 2 = 48%, p = 0.65, OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.46-1.62), 30-day mortality (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.61, OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.41-1.68), and ECMO duration in adults (I 2 = 41%, p = 0.75, mean difference (MD) = -3.19, 95% CI: -23.01-16.63) and children (I 2 = 76%, p = 0.65, MD = 40.33, 95% CI:-135.45-216.12). Conclusions: Compared with UFH, bivalirudin can be a safe and feasible alternative anticoagulant option to UFH as anticoagulation therapy in ECMO, especially for heparin resistance (HR) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) cases.

Project description:BackgroundDuring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO), direct thrombin inhibitors are considered by some potentially advantageous over unfractionated heparin (UFH). We tested the hypothesis that Argatroban is non-inferior to UFH regarding thrombosis and bleeding during vvECMO.MethodsWe conducted a propensity-score matched observational non-inferiority study of consecutive patients without heparin-induced-thrombocytopenia (HIT) on vvECMO, treated between January 2006 and March 2019 in the medical intensive care unit at the University Hospital Regensburg. Anticoagulation was realized with UFH until August 2017 and with Argatroban from September 2017 onwards. Target activated partial thromboplastin time was 50 ± 5seconds in both groups. Primary composite endpoint was major thrombosis and/or major bleeding. Major bleeding was defined as a drop in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dl/day or in transfusion of ≥ 2 packed red cells/24 h, or retroperitoneal, cerebral, or pulmonary bleeding. Major thrombosis was defined as obstruction of > 50% of the vessel lumen diameter by means of duplex sonography. We also assessed technical complications such as oxygenator defects or pump head thrombosis, the time-course of platelets, and the cost of anticoagulation (including HIT-testing).ResultsOut of 465 patients receiving UFH, 78 were matched to 39 patients receiving Argatroban. The primary endpoint occurred in 79% of patients in the Argatroban group and in 83% in the UFH group (non-inferiority for Argatroban, p = 0.026). The occurrence of technical complications was equally distributed (Argatroban 49% vs. UFH 42%, p = 0.511). The number of platelets was similar in both groups before ECMO therapy but lower in the UFH group after end of ECMO support (median [IQR]: 141 [104;198]/nl vs. 107 [54;171]/nl, p = 0.010). Anticoagulation costs per day of ECMO were higher in the Argatroban group (€26 [13.8;53.0] vs. €0.9 [0.5;1.5], p < 0.001) but not after accounting for blood products and HIT-testing (€63 [42;171) vs. €40 [17;158], p = 0.074).ConclusionIn patients without HIT on vvECMO, Argatroban was non-inferior to UFH regarding bleeding and thrombosis. The occurrence of technical complications was similarly distributed. Argatroban may have less impact on platelet decrease during ECMO, but this finding needs further evaluation. Direct drug costs were higher for Argatroban but comparable to UFH after accounting for HIT-testing and transfusions.

Project description:BACKGROUND:There is no consensus on the management of anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). ECMO is currently burdened by a high rate of hemostatic complications, possibly associated with inadequate monitoring of heparin anticoagulation. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of an anticoagulation protocol for patients undergoing ECMO based on thromboelastography (TEG) as opposed to an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based protocol. METHODS:We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in two academic tertiary care centers. Adult patients with acute respiratory failure treated with veno-venous ECMO were randomized to manage heparin anticoagulation using a TEG-based protocol (target 16-24 min of the R parameter, TEG group) or a standard of care aPTT-based protocol (target 1.5-2 of aPTT ratio, aPTT group). Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of the study protocol. RESULTS:Forty-two patients were enrolled: 21 were randomized to the TEG group and 21 to the aPTT group. Duration of ECMO was similar in the two groups (9 (7-16) days in the TEG group and 11 (4-17) days in the aPTT group, p = 0.74). Heparin dosing was lower in the TEG group compared to the aPTT group (11.7 (9.5-15.3) IU/kg/h vs. 15.7 (10.9-21.3) IU/kg/h, respectively, p = 0.03). Safety parameters, assessed as number of hemorrhagic or thrombotic events and transfusions given, were not different between the two study groups. As for the feasibility, the TEG-based protocol triggered heparin infusion rate adjustments more frequently (p < 0.01) and results were less frequently in the target range compared to the aPTT-based protocol (p < 0.001). Number of prescribed TEG or aPTT controls (according to study groups) and protocol violations were not different between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS:TEG seems to be safely used to guide anticoagulation management during ECMO. Its use was associated with the administration of lower heparin doses compared to a standard of care aPTT-based protocol. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, October 22,2014. Identifier: NCT02271126.

Dataset Information

Management of Bivalirudin Anticoagulation Therapy for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and a Systematic Review.

Publications

Management of Bivalirudin Anticoagulation Therapy for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and a Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets