Dataset Information

Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) classification showed superiority over 8th edition N staging in predicting survival of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) patients. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Tumor, LODDS, and Metastasis (TLM) staging of SBA. METHODS:Totally 1789 SBA patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988-2010, 437 patients from SEER database between 2011-2013 and 166 patients from multicenters were categorized into development, validation and test cohort, respectively. The TLM staging was developed in the development cohort using Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD) method. C-index was used to assess the performance of the TLM staging in predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and was compared with the traditional 8th edition TNM staging. FINDINGS:Four-category TLM staging designed for the development cohort showed higher discriminatory power than TNM staging in predicting CSS in the development cohort (0.682 vs. 0.650, P < 0.001), validation cohort (0.682 vs. 0.654, P = 0.022), and test cohort (0.659 vs. 0.611, P = 0.023), respectively. TLM staging continued to show its higher predictive efficacy than the 8th TNM in TNM stage II/III patients or in patients with lymph node yield less than 8. INTERPRETATION:TLM staging showed a better prognostic performance than the 8th TNM staging especially TNM stage II/III or patients with lymph node yield less than 8 and therefore, could serve to complement the TNM staging in patients with SBA. FUNDING:A full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section.

SUBMITTER: Dai ZH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7519244 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study.

Dai Zi-Hao ZH Wang Qi-Wen QW Zhang Qing-Wei QW Yan Xia-Lin XL Aparicio Thomas T Zhou Yang-Yang YY Wang Huan H Zhang Chi-Hao CH Zaanan Aziz A Afchain Pauline P Zhang Yan Y Chen Hui-Min HM Gao Yun-Jie YJ Ge Zhi-Zheng ZZ

EBioMedicine 20200924

<h4>Background</h4>Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) classification showed superiority over 8<sup>th</sup> edition N staging in predicting survival of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) patients. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Tumor, LODDS, and Metastasis (TLM) staging of SBA.<h4>Methods</h4>Totally 1789 SBA patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988-2010, 437 patients from SEER database between 2011-2013 and 166 patient ...[more]

PMID: 32980692

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lung adenocarcinoma (LAD) is difficult to diagnose as it tends to be small in size and metastasize early. The aim of the present study was to investigate prognostic factors for patients with LAD and establish a prognosis risk model. A training set consisting of clinical and RNA sequencing data from 503 patients with LAD, as well as expression data from a further 59 LAD and adjacent tissues, was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Additionally, a validation dataset was acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE26939), which included clinical and gene expression data from 115 patients. Using the DESeq2 package to compare expression between LAD and adjacent tissues, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. On the basis of survival and the random forests for survival, regression and classification package, genes for constructing the prognosis risk model were selected. The prognosis risk model was constructed and validated using the survival package. Subsequently, high- and low-risk groups were compared using the Limma package to identify DEGs, and enrichment analysis was performed using the web-based gene set analysis toolkit. A protein-protein interaction network was visualized using Cytoscape software. There were 18,567 DEGs between the LAD samples and the adjacent tissues, and 363 DEGs between the high- and low-risk groups. Of these, four genes were selected for constructing the prognosis risk model, myosin IE (MYO1E), endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductase 1α (ERO1L), C1q and tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6 (C1QTNF6) and family with sequence similarity 83, member A (FAM83A). The survival time of high- and low-risk groups in the validation set were significantly different. Functional enrichment revealed that the genes that interacted with MYO1E, ERO1L, C1QTNF6 and FAM83A separately were enriched in 'cell cycle regulation', 'synthesis and assembly of nucleic acids', 'histone modification and cell cycle progression' and 'cell secretion process'. The four-gene prognosis risk model could potentially be used for predicting the survival of patients with LAD.

Project description:Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the main types of lung cancer. Because of its low early diagnosis rate, poor late prognosis, and high mortality, it is of great significance to find biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: Five hundred and twelve LUADs from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used for differential expression analysis and short time-series expression miner (STEM) analysis to identify the LUAD-development characteristic genes. Survival analysis was used to identify the LUAD-unfavorable genes and LUAD-favorable genes. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was used to score individual samples against the two gene sets. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to explore the diagnostic and prognostic ability of the two GSVA score systems. Two independent data sets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were used for verifying the results. Functional enrichment analysis was used to explore the potential biological functions of LUAD-unfavorable genes. Results: With the development of LUAD, 185 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were gradually upregulated, of which 84 genes were associated with LUAD survival and named as LUAD-unfavorable gene set. While 237 DEGs were gradually downregulated, of which 39 genes were associated with LUAD survival and named as LUAD-favorable gene set. ROC curve analysis and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses indicated both of LUAD-unfavorable GSVA score and LUAD-favorable GSVA score were a biomarker of LUAD. Moreover, both of these two GSVA score systems were an independent factor for LUAD prognosis. The LUAD-unfavorable genes were significantly involved in p53 signaling pathway, Oocyte meiosis, and Cell cycle. Conclusion: We identified and validated two LUAD-development characteristic gene sets that not only have diagnostic value but also prognostic value. It may provide new insight for further research on LUAD.

Project description:BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is an aggressive cancer that has an extremely poor prognosis. As well as facilitating the detachment of cancer cells from the primary tumor site, anoikis plays an important role in cancer metastasis. Few studies to date, however, have examined the role of anoikis in LUAD, in patient prognosis.MethodsA total of 316 anoikis-related genes (ANRGs) integrated from Genecards and Harmonizome portals. LUAD transcriptome data were retrieved from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Anoikis-related prognostic genes (ANRGs) were primarily screened by univariate Cox regression. All ANRGs were included in the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression model to construct the powerful prognostic signature. This signature was validated and assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Anoikis-related regulators of risk score were identified using a XG-boost machine learning model. The expression of ITGB4 protein was examined in a ZhengZhou University (ZZU) tissue cohort by immunohistochemistry, and the potential mechanisms of action of ITGB4 in LUAD were explored by GO, KEGG, and ingenuity pathway analyses and by GSEA.ResultsA risk score signature was constructed based on eight ANRGs, with high risk scores found to closely correlate with unfavorable clinical features. ITGB4 expression may be associated with 5-year over survival, with immunohistochemistry showed that the expression of ITGB4 was higher in LUAD than in nontumor tissues. Enrichment analysis suggested that ITGB4 may promote LUAD development by targeting E2F, MYC, and oxidative phosphorylation signaling pathways.ConclusionOur anoikis-related signature from RNA-seq data may be a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with LUAD. It may help physicians develop personalized LUAD treatments in clinical practice. Moreover, ITGB4 may affect the development of LUAD through the oxidative phosphorylation pathway.

Project description:BackgroundCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer worldwide with relatively low metastatic potential (2-5%). Developments in therapeutic options have highlighted the need to better identify high-risk patients who could benefit from closer surveillance, adjuvant therapies and baseline/follow-up imaging, while at the same time safely omitting low-risk patients from further follow-up. Controversy remains regarding the predictive performance of current cSCC staging systems and which methodology to adopt.ObjectivesTo validate the performance of four cSCC staging systems [American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition (AJCC8), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Tübingen and Salamanca T3 refinement] in predicting metastasis using a nationwide cohort.MethodsA nested case-control study using data from the National Disease Registration Service, England, 2013-2015 was conducted. Metastatic cSCC cases were identified using an algorithm to identify all potential cases for manual review. These were 1 : 1 matched on follow-up time to nonmetastatic controls randomly selected from 2013. Staging systems were analysed for distinctiveness, homogeneity, monotonicity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and c-index.ResultsWe included 887 metastatic cSCC cases and 887 nonmetastatic cSCC controls. The BWH system showed the highest specificity [92.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 90.8-94.3%, PPV (13.2%, 95% CI 10.6-16.2) and c-index (0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.86). The AJCC8 showed superior NPV (99.2%, 95% CI 99.2-99.3), homogeneity and monotonicity compared with the BWH and Tübingen diameter and thickness classifications (P < 0.001). Salamanca refinement did not show any improvement in AJCC8 T3 cSCC staging.ConclusionsWe validated four cSCC staging systems using the largest nationwide dataset of metastatic cSCC so far. Although the BWH system showed the highest overall discriminative ability, PPV was low for all staging systems, which shows the need for further improvement and refining of current cSCC staging systems.

Dataset Information

Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study.

Publications

Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets