Dataset Information

Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as FGFR2 gene fusions, mutations of IDH1/2, HER2, BRAC1/2 and BRAF. Pembigatinib has become the first approved targeted therapy for BTC with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Recent immunotherapy has opened new therapy avenues in BTC with pembrolizumab approved for either microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors, including BTC. The combination of immunotherapy with other modalities is currently being evaluated in different clinical trials, since single agent immunotherapy appears to provide modest benefits in advanced BTC. In this review, we summarize the current status of treatment options, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations in advanced BTC.

SUBMITTER: Xie C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7519922 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

Xie Changqing C McGrath Nicole A NA Monge Bonilla Cecilia C Fu Jianyang J

Journal of gastroenterology 20200803 10

Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identifi ...[more]

PMID: 32748173

Similar Datasets

Project description:Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) has a poor prognosis and is increasing in incidence. Although surgery, chemotherapy and other treatment modalities have improved, surgery remains the only potential curative treatment and is appropriate for only those few patients who present with localized, resectable disease. However, for the majority of patients, unresectable disease is evident at diagnosis and about 95% of patients die within 10 years, despite the majority receiving chemotherapy. Long-term survival is significantly greater for patients with resected BTC compared to those with unresectable disease. In unresected disease, life expectancy is limited, with first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin (GEM/CIS) accepted as standard of care. Currently no standard second-line regimen which provides significant improvement of clinical outcomes exists for those who present with refractory disease or who relapse after first-line treatment. Of particular importance is establishing the impact of best supportive care (BSC) as a benchmark for survival outcomes to which the impact of treatment modalities can be compared. Survival outcome often differs significantly for patients with different prognostic factor profiles even when receiving the same therapy so that it can be difficult to predict which patient subgroup might benefit most from which therapy. Therefore, the influence of prognostic factors on survival under different therapies as well as under BSC needs to be further assessed in order to arrive at truly evidence-based, best therapeutic decisions for individual patients. Encouraging new research into the genomic landscape of BTC may help to further subdivide the BTC population into molecular-genetic clusters likely to be sensitive to different targeted therapy approaches leading to further improvements in survival. Consequently, an unmet need exists not only to develop new and more effective therapies for this devastating disease, but also to integrate original research findings into a more complex, dynamic, individualized therapeutic decision model to aid clinicians in making evidence-based, best therapeutic decisions for individual patients.

Project description:Background:Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a poor prognosis. First-line sorafenib has been the standard of care for a decade, but the treatment landscape is expanding. This review provides a practical overview of current and future systemic treatment options for advanced HCC and their place in clinical practice. Summary:First-line sorafenib and lenvatinib have shown to improve the survival of patients with advanced HCC. In the second line, regorafenib provides benefit for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib. Anti-PD1 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, recently became available for second-line use in the US. Ramucirumab (for patients with ?-fetoprotein [AFP] levels ?400) and cabozantinib present potential future second-line treatment options. Combinations of systemic and locoregional treatment, such as radiofrequency ablation or selective internal radiotherapy, require further research. Precision medicine has not yet been translated into clinical practice, as the most common driver mutations (TERT promoter, CTNNB1, TP53, and ARID1A mutations) have not yet been shown to be suitable therapeutic targets. However, our growing understanding of signaling pathways and efforts in drug development are expected to pave the way for precision medicine in HCC in the future. Evaluating the place for the current and novel systemic treatment options in clinical practice can be challenging due to the diverse toxicity profiles of the treatment options and characteristics of the patient population. Sorafenib data elucidate the effect patient characteristics (such as the performance score, Child-Pugh class, AFP, etiology of the underlying disease, and level of macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread) may have on outcomes in advanced stages. Key Messages:Lenvatinib is expected to join sorafenib as a preferred first-line treatment in advanced HCC. In the second line, the treatment of choice, regorafenib, is soon expected to be accompanied by cabozantinib and ramucirumab in patients with AFP ?400 ng/mL, whereas nivolumab and pembrolizumab present second-line alternatives in the US.

Project description:Gemcitabine combined with platinum/fluorouracil drugs is the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). We explored the safety and efficacy of toripalimab plus gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs. At a one-sided significance level of 0.025, a total of 50 patients could provide 80% power to show the efficacy at targeted progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months of 70% versus 40% for the combined treatment. This single-arm, phase II study enrolled 50 patients with advanced BTCs who previously received no systemic treatment. The regimen was as follows: toripalimab (240 mg, i.v., d1), gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2, i.v., d1 and d8), and S-1 (40-60 mg bid p.o., d1-14, Q21d). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. The associations between response with PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and genetic variations were explored. Patients were enrolled from January 2019 to August 2020, with a median follow-up time of 24.0 months (IQR: 4.3-31.0 months). The 6-month PFS rate was 62%. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.0-8.9 months), and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.6-18.4 months). Forty-nine patients completed the evaluation for tumor response. The ORR was 30.6% (95% CI: 17.2%-44.0%), and the disease control rate was 87.8% (95% CI: 78.2%-97.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (98.0%), neutropenia (92%), and anemia (86.0%). Grade III/IV TRAEs included leukopenia (38.0%), neutropenia (32%), skin rash (6%), anemia (2.0%), mucositis (2%), and immune-related colitis (2%). Among them, the grade III/IV immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were skin rash and colitis. In addition, biomarker analysis showed that negative PD-L1 expression and SMARCA4 mutation were significantly associated with worse survival outcomes, while no significant associations were observed for TP53, KRAS, or CDKN 2 A mutation as well as TMB. In conclusion, our data suggest that a regimen of toripalimab plus GS could improve PFS and OS with a good safety profile as a first-line treatment option for advanced BTC and warrants further verification.

Dataset Information

Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

Publications

Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets