Performance and outcome of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: A population-based study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Matsuo K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7521603 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Performance and outcome of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: A population-based study.
Matsuo Koji K Mandelbaum Rachel S RS Adams Crystal L CL Roman Lynda D LD Wright Jason D JD
Gynecologic oncology 20190219 2
<h4>Objective</h4>To examine changes in performance and outcomes of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a population-based retrospective study examining the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2001 and 2015. Women with cervical, uterine, vaginal, and vulvar malignancies who underwent pelvic exenteration were examined. Comorbidity, perioperative complications, total charges, length of stay, and mortality were assessed.<h4>Results</h4>There were 2647 cases incl ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and objectivesTo examine the association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative mortality of pelvic exenteration performed for gynecologic malignancies.MethodsA population-based retrospective study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was conducted to examine pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies from 2001 to 2011. Annualized hospital surgical volume was defined as the average number of procedures a hospital performed per year in which at least one case was performed, and this was correlated to perioperative mortality.ResultsA total 1912 exenterations performed at 181 centers were included. Nearly two thirds of exenteration-performing centers had a minimum surgical volume of one case per year (121 centers, 66.9%). Perioperative mortality rate was 1.8%. In multivariable analysis surgical volume remained an independent factor for perioperative mortality (adjusted-odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.49; P < .001). Perioperative mortality rates were 3.7% for the centers with minimum surgical volume (1 exenteration a year), 1.4% for the centers performing more than one but two or less exenterations a year, and 0% for the top decile centers (>2 exenterations a year), respectively (P < .001).ConclusionPelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy is a rare surgical procedure with most hospitals performing few cases annually. A higher surgical volume of pelvic exenteration was associated with lower perioperative mortality.
| S-EPMC7523231 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveIn patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecological malignancies, we assessed the performance of [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT for delineating disease extent and evaluated the association between quantitative FDG uptake metrics (SUVmax, total lesion glycolysis [TLG] and metabolic tumor volume [MTV]) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).MethodsRetrospective study of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies between January 2002 and November 2011 who had FDG PET/CT within 90days before surgery. Two readers (R1, R2) independently determined the presence of bladder, rectum, vagina, cervix and pelvic side wall invasion and measured SUVmax, TLG and MTV in each patient. Areas under the curve (AUCs), for detecting organ invasion were calculated. Kaplan-Meier graphs were used to determine associations between FDG uptake and PFS/OS. Inter-reader agreement was assessed.Results33 patients (mean age 56years, range: 28-81) were included; primary sites of disease were the cervix (n=18), uterus (n=8) and vagina/vulva (n=7). AUCs for organ invasion ranged from 0.74 to 0.96. There was a significant association between FDG uptake metrics incorporating tumor volume (TLG and MTV) and OS (p≤0.001) as well as between MTV and PFS (p=0.001). No significant association was identified between SUVmax and OS/PFS (p=0.604/0.652). Inter-reader agreement for organ invasion was fair to substantial (k=0.36-0.74) and almost perfect for FDG quantification (ICC=0.97-0.99).ConclusionIn patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecological malignancies, (18)F-FDG PET/CT is useful for preoperative assessment of disease extent. Furthermore, quantitative metrics of FDG uptake incorporating MTV serve as predictive biomarkers of progression-free and overall survival in this population.
| S-EPMC4104687 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Five-Year survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies has been reported as high as 60%. The objective of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) after pelvic exenteration and evaluate factors impacting outcome.A retrospective review of all women who underwent pelvic exenteration at our institution between February 1993 and December 2010 was performed. OS was defined as time from exenteration to date of death or last contact. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meyer method. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clinical and pathologic factors on survival outcomes.One hundred sixty patients with gynecologic malignancy underwent pelvic exenteration. Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 33% (95%CI 0.25-0.40). Factors which negatively impacted RFS included shorter treatment-free interval (p=.050), vulvar primary (p=.032), positive margins (p<.001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p<.001), positive lymph nodes (p<.001) and perineural invasion (p=0.030). In multivariate analysis, positive margins (p=.040), positive nodes (p<.001) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p=.003) retained a significant impact on RFS. Five-year OS was 40% (95% CI 0.32-0.48). Factors which negatively impacted OS included vulvar primary (p=.04), positive margins (p<.001), LVSI (p<.001), positive lymph nodes (p<.001) and perineural invasion (p=.008). In multivariate analysis, positive nodes (p=.001) and LVSI (p=.001) retained a significant impact on OS.Five-year OS after pelvic exenteration was 40%. Survival outcomes have not significantly improved despite improvements in technique and patient selection. Multiple non-modifiable factors at the time of exenteration are associated with poor survival.
| S-EPMC4160382 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo explore pre-operative factors and their impact on overall survival (OS) in a modern cohort of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration (PE) for gynecologic malignancies.MethodsA retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent a PE from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2018 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were exenteration due to recurrent or progressive carcinoma of the uterus, cervix, vagina or vulva, with histologically confirmed complete surgical resection of the malignancy. Exclusion criteria included PE for palliation of symptoms without recurrence, and for ovarian or rare histologic malignancies. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to identify factors predicting prolonged survival.ResultsOverall, 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age at time of exenteration was 62 years (range, 28-86 years). Vulvar cancer was the most common primary diagnosis (32%); 30% had cervical cancer; 23%, uterine cancer; 15%, vaginal cancer. Median OS was 55.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 36-not estimable) with a median follow-up time of 40.8 months (95% CI: 1-116.1). On univariable analysis, age > 62 years (hazard ratio (HR) 2.71, 95% CI 1.27-5.79), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) 3-4 (HR: 3.41 (95% CI 1.03-11.29), and vulvar cancer (HR 4.19 (95% CI 1.17-14.96) predicted worse OS. Tumor size and prior progression-free interval (PFI) did not meet statistical significance in OS analyses. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant factors associated with worse OS.ConclusionsPE performed with curative intent may be considered a treatment option in well-counseled, carefully selected patients, irrespective of tumor size and PFI before exenteration.
| S-EPMC8585715 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the association between pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and breast, colorectal, gynecologic and urinary tract cancer. Methods: The source of data was a longitudinal dataset compiled by the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID2000) which was collected by the National Health Insurance program. Cases of PID, at least two outpatient visits and one admission, were diagnosed from 2000 to 2013. The data for controls, age matched women who were not diagnosed with PID from 2000 to 2013, were also obtained. Results: A total of 47,333 PID cases and 189,332 for control group were included in the study. The ectopic pregnancy incidence rate (per 10000 person months) was 1.912 and 0.595 in the PID and control group, respectively; the rate ratio was 3.211 (confidence interval, CI = 2.931-3.519). There were significantly different in gynecologic cancers and urinary tract cancers between the PID and control group; the rate ratios (95% C.I.) were 1.903 (1.672-2.166) and 1.566 (1.211-2.025), respectively. Conclusion: Our study found that PID was associated with increased risks of gynecologic and urinary tract cancer but not colorectal or breast cancer. The information may lead to a strategy for cancer prevention and a reasonable healthcare usage through understanding PID epidemiology and controlling the inflammatory responses.
| S-EPMC6329849 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundPelvic exenteration (PE) is the only option for long-term cure of advanced cancer originating from different types of tumor or recurrent disease in the lower pelvis. The aim was to show differences between colorectal and non-colorectal cancer in survival and postoperative morbidity.MethodsRetrospective data of 63 patients treated with total pelvic exenteration between 2013 and 2018 are reported. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters, survival data, and risk factors for complications were analyzed.ResultsA total of 57.2% (n = 37) of the patients had colorectal cancer, 22.3% had gynecological malignancies (vulvar (n = 6) or cervical (n = 8) cancer), 11.1% (n = 7) had anal cancer, and 9.5% had other primary tumors. A total of 30.2% (n = 19) underwent PE for a primary tumor and 69.8% (n = 44) for recurrent cancer. The 30-day in-hospital mortality was 0%. Neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 65.1% (n = 41) of the patients and correlated significantly with postoperative complications (odds ratio 4.441; 95% CI: 1.375-14.342, P > 0.05). R0, R1, R2, and Rx resections were achieved in 65.1%, 19%, 1.6%, and 14.3% of the patients, respectively. In patients undergoing R0 resection, 2-year OS and RFS were 73.2% and 52.4%, respectively. Resection status was a significant risk factor for recurrence-free and overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed age (P = 0.021), ASA ≥ 3 (P = 0.005), high blood loss (P = 0.028), low preoperative hemoglobin level (P < 0.001), nodal positivity (P < 0.001), and surgical complications (P = 0.003) as independent risk factors for OS.ConclusionPelvic exenteration is a procedure with high morbidity rates but remains the only curative option for advanced or recurrent colorectal and non-colorectal cancer in the pelvis.
| S-EPMC8279979 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPelvic malignant tumors often originate in the rectum, bladder, uterus, and other organs. In patients with locally advanced tumours in the presence of direct invasion of one or more organs, negative tumor resection margin (R0) resection can be very beneficial to patient survival if it can be performed. As a multidisciplinary and high-risk surgical method, the pelvic exenteration (PE) procedure has only been reported in a few medical centres internationally. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who had undergone PE surgery in our hospital, in order to provide ideas for the best treatment of patients with pelvic malignant tumors.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 59 patients with pelvic malignant tumors admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2015 to July 2021, all of whom received PE surgery. They were divided into two groups according to the location of the disease: the rectal cancer group (n=40) and the cervical cancer group (n=19). Statistical analysis was performed on the baseline and follow-up data of the two groups of patients.Results(I) Patient baseline data. Compared to the rectal cancer group, more patients in the cervical cancer group received preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (P=0.013), and had a lower R0 resection rate (P=0.037). Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer and cervical cancer were 27.5% and 47.3%, respectively. (II) Patient survival analysis after PE surgery. The 5-year survival rate was 36.6% in the rectal cancer group and 25.3% in the cervical cancer group. In the rectal cancer group, for the primary tumor, if there was no lymph node metastasis or no postoperative complications in the postoperative pathology, the patient had a good survival prognosis. Univariate analysis showed that recurrent rectal cancer, postoperative lymph node metastasis, postoperative complications, and microsatellite stability (MSS) were significant predictors of poor survival outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and postoperative complications were independent prognostic factors for patient survival.ConclusionsPE is a viable option for pelvic malignancies; aggressive radical resection of lesions and reduced postoperative complications can effectively improve patient outcomes.
| S-EPMC10932647 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPelvic exenteration (PE) for primary and recurrent cervical cancer has resulted in favorable survival outcomes, but there are controversies about specific prognosis factors, and up to now, there have been no published reports from China. This study aimed to share our experiences of PE, which were performed in a single institution.MethodsFrom January 2009 to January 2016, 38 patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer were included in the study, and they were followed up until January 2017. Epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of patients were compared for survival outcomes in univariate and Cox hazard regression analysis.ResultsThere were thirty-one and seven patients with recurrent and persistent cervical cancer, respectively. The median age of patients was 45 years (range 29-65 years). Total, anterior, and posterior PE consisted of 52.6%, 28.9%, and 18.4% of cases, respectively. Early and late complications occurred in 21 (55.3%) patients and 15 (39.5%) patients, respectively. Two (5.3%) patients died due to complications related to surgeries within 3 months after PE. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 28.5 months (range 9-96 months) and 23 months (range 4-96 months), respectively, and 5-year OS and DFS were 48% and 40%, respectively. Cox hazard regression analysis showed that, the margin status of the incision and mesorectal lymph node status were independent risk factors for OS and DFS.ConclusionIn our patients with recurrent and persistent cervical cancer, the practice of PE might achieve favorable survival outcomes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03291275; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03291275?term=NCT03291275&rank=1.
| S-EPMC6032675 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed through conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) versus robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in patients with gynecologic malignancies.Materials and methodsPerioperative data, including operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications, were retrospectively analyzed in 731 patients with gynecologic malignancies who underwent transperitoneal PLND, including 460 and 271 in the CLS and RAS groups, respectively. Data were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test or Student's t-test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe mean age was 50 ± 14 years and 53 ± 13 years in the RAS and CLS groups (P < 0.01), respectively. The mean body mass index was 23.4 ± 4.8 kg/m2 and 22.4 ± 3.6 kg/m2 in the RAS group and CLS groups (P < 0.01), respectively. The operative time, blood loss, and number of resected lymph nodes were 52 ± 15 min, 110 ± 88 mL, and 45 ± 17, respectively, in the RAS group and 46 ± 15 min, 89 ± 78 mL, and 38 ± 16, respectively, in the CLS group (all P < 0.01). The rate of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III complications was 6.3% and 8.7% in the RAS and CLS groups, respectively (P = 0.17).ConclusionShorter operative time and lower blood loss are achieved when PLND for gynecologic malignancies is performed through CLS rather than RAS. However, RAS results in the resection of a greater number of pelvic lymph nodes.
| S-EPMC10936717 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPelvic exenteration (PE) is the preferred treatment available for selected patients diagnosed with locally advanced or recurrent cancer confined to the pelvis. Currently, the majority of the literature reports only on short-term survival and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to describe long-term survival and QoL outcomes following PE.MethodsThis was a cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing PE from 1994 to 2016 at a major teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. From 2008, consenting patients were also included in a prospective QoL study. Main outcomes were long-term survival and QoL assessed with SF-36® and FACT-C questionnaires. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsSome 515 patients underwent PE for locally advanced or recurrent cancer. The cumulative 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 48·6 and 37·8 per cent respectively. The survival estimates were significantly higher for patients with advanced primary rectal cancer (P = 0·045) and those in whom a clear resection margin was achieved (P < 0·001). Some 287 patients were enrolled into the QoL study. Response rates at baseline, 6 months and 5 years were 92·0, 70·0 and 33 per cent respectively. Patients had recovered to their preoperative QoL status by 6 months and, among survivors, QoL remained essentially unchanged during the 5-year follow-up.ConclusionPatients who underwent PE owing to advanced primary rectal cancer or achieved a clear resection margin had a greater chance of survival. Overall, QoL returned to baseline within 6 months after surgery.
| S-EPMC6156168 | biostudies-literature